引导骨再生的声明和建议:2016年10月15日至16日在博洛尼亚举行的引导骨再生研讨会的共识报告。

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000909
A. Cucchi, A. Chierico, F. Fontana, F. Mazzocco, C. Cinquegrana, F. Belleggia, Paolo Rossetti, C. Soardi, M. Todisco, Roberto Luongo, L. Signorini, M. Ronda, R. Pistilli
{"title":"引导骨再生的声明和建议:2016年10月15日至16日在博洛尼亚举行的引导骨再生研讨会的共识报告。","authors":"A. Cucchi, A. Chierico, F. Fontana, F. Mazzocco, C. Cinquegrana, F. Belleggia, Paolo Rossetti, C. Soardi, M. Todisco, Roberto Luongo, L. Signorini, M. Ronda, R. Pistilli","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nIn the past 10 years, long-term studies have demonstrated that guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a successful and reliable technique for vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation, but strict and rigorous protocols must be adopted.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nBecause no reports have yet been published with statements and clinical recommendations for GBR, a closed meeting of all authors was organized to discuss this matter during a GBR symposium held in Bologna (Italy) in October 2016. The authors focused on the findings of systematic and narrative reviews, prepared before the meeting, covering aspects of the clinical management of GBR techniques. Successively, a discussion based on the scientific evidence and on the experts' opinions led to the formulation of statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTo avoid complications and to optimize outcomes, the following factors should be considered by clinicians: patient selection; analysis of defect type; blood supply; antibiotic treatment; flap passivation; delayed implant placement; combination of autogenous bone and xenograft or allograft; rigorous fixation of membranes; removal after 6 to 9 months; analysis of complications; soft-tissue management; and high care in scarred sites and in esthetic areas.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe present consensus report reviewed the scientific evidence and provided specific guidelines and recommendations for clinical practice and the different approaches to GBR techniques to ensure surgical success and predictable outcomes.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000909","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statements and Recommendations for Guided Bone Regeneration: Consensus Report of the Guided Bone Regeneration Symposium Held in Bologna, October 15 to 16, 2016.\",\"authors\":\"A. Cucchi, A. Chierico, F. Fontana, F. Mazzocco, C. Cinquegrana, F. Belleggia, Paolo Rossetti, C. Soardi, M. Todisco, Roberto Luongo, L. Signorini, M. Ronda, R. Pistilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ID.0000000000000909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nIn the past 10 years, long-term studies have demonstrated that guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a successful and reliable technique for vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation, but strict and rigorous protocols must be adopted.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nBecause no reports have yet been published with statements and clinical recommendations for GBR, a closed meeting of all authors was organized to discuss this matter during a GBR symposium held in Bologna (Italy) in October 2016. The authors focused on the findings of systematic and narrative reviews, prepared before the meeting, covering aspects of the clinical management of GBR techniques. Successively, a discussion based on the scientific evidence and on the experts' opinions led to the formulation of statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTo avoid complications and to optimize outcomes, the following factors should be considered by clinicians: patient selection; analysis of defect type; blood supply; antibiotic treatment; flap passivation; delayed implant placement; combination of autogenous bone and xenograft or allograft; rigorous fixation of membranes; removal after 6 to 9 months; analysis of complications; soft-tissue management; and high care in scarred sites and in esthetic areas.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe present consensus report reviewed the scientific evidence and provided specific guidelines and recommendations for clinical practice and the different approaches to GBR techniques to ensure surgical success and predictable outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000909\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000909\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在过去的10年里,长期的研究表明,引导骨再生(GBR)是一种成功和可靠的技术,用于垂直和水平脊增强,但必须采用严格和严格的协议。材料和方法由于尚未发表关于GBR的声明和临床建议的报告,因此于2016年10月在意大利博洛尼亚举行的GBR研讨会上组织了一次所有作者的闭门会议来讨论这一问题。作者着重于会议前准备的系统和叙述性综述的发现,涵盖了GBR技术的临床管理方面。随后,基于科学证据和专家意见的讨论导致了声明的制定、临床建议和对未来研究的影响。结果为避免并发症的发生,优化治疗效果,临床医生应考虑以下因素:患者的选择;缺陷类型分析;血液供应;抗生素治疗;皮瓣钝化;延迟植入;自体骨与异种或同种异体骨的结合;膜的严格固定;6至9个月后移除;并发症分析;软组织管理;在伤痕累累的地方和美观的地方得到高度的护理。结论本共识报告回顾了科学证据,为临床实践和GBR技术的不同方法提供了具体的指导和建议,以确保手术成功和可预测的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statements and Recommendations for Guided Bone Regeneration: Consensus Report of the Guided Bone Regeneration Symposium Held in Bologna, October 15 to 16, 2016.
INTRODUCTION In the past 10 years, long-term studies have demonstrated that guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a successful and reliable technique for vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation, but strict and rigorous protocols must be adopted. MATERIAL AND METHODS Because no reports have yet been published with statements and clinical recommendations for GBR, a closed meeting of all authors was organized to discuss this matter during a GBR symposium held in Bologna (Italy) in October 2016. The authors focused on the findings of systematic and narrative reviews, prepared before the meeting, covering aspects of the clinical management of GBR techniques. Successively, a discussion based on the scientific evidence and on the experts' opinions led to the formulation of statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research. RESULTS To avoid complications and to optimize outcomes, the following factors should be considered by clinicians: patient selection; analysis of defect type; blood supply; antibiotic treatment; flap passivation; delayed implant placement; combination of autogenous bone and xenograft or allograft; rigorous fixation of membranes; removal after 6 to 9 months; analysis of complications; soft-tissue management; and high care in scarred sites and in esthetic areas. CONCLUSIONS The present consensus report reviewed the scientific evidence and provided specific guidelines and recommendations for clinical practice and the different approaches to GBR techniques to ensure surgical success and predictable outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Council Implant. Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Outcomes of Tooth-Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Periodontally Compromised and Treated Patients Refusing Bone Grafting Surgical Therapies. Ridge Augmentation Comparing an Allograft Plus Autogenous Bone Chips to an Osteoinductive Demineralized Bone Matrix: A Clinical and Histologic Study in Humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1