大众视野中的去文本化词典

Q2 Arts and Humanities Dictionaries Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.1353/dic.2021.0007
K. Martin
{"title":"大众视野中的去文本化词典","authors":"K. Martin","doi":"10.1353/dic.2021.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The advent of third-party licensing and aggregation has provided larger audiences for dictionary content and new revenue opportunities for publishers, but it also disrupts the notion of the dictionary as a self-contained source of information and introduces new intermediaries between dictionary makers and dictionary users. At the same time, the public statements of dictionary brands in traditional and social media expand the public perception of what the dictionary is. This article describes the \"decontextualization\" of dictionary content in the current market and presents a qualitative review of recent news stories involving dictionaries to identify themes in how the different scenarios in which dictionary content is used affect reception of dictionaries by the public.","PeriodicalId":35106,"journal":{"name":"Dictionaries","volume":"21 9","pages":"215 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Decontextualized Dictionary in the Public Eye\",\"authors\":\"K. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dic.2021.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The advent of third-party licensing and aggregation has provided larger audiences for dictionary content and new revenue opportunities for publishers, but it also disrupts the notion of the dictionary as a self-contained source of information and introduces new intermediaries between dictionary makers and dictionary users. At the same time, the public statements of dictionary brands in traditional and social media expand the public perception of what the dictionary is. This article describes the \\\"decontextualization\\\" of dictionary content in the current market and presents a qualitative review of recent news stories involving dictionaries to identify themes in how the different scenarios in which dictionary content is used affect reception of dictionaries by the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dictionaries\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"215 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dictionaries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2021.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dictionaries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2021.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:第三方授权和聚合的出现为词典内容提供了更多的受众,也为出版商提供了新的收入机会,但它也颠覆了词典作为独立信息来源的概念,并在词典制造商和词典用户之间引入了新的中介。与此同时,词典品牌在传统媒体和社交媒体上的公开声明扩大了公众对词典的认知。本文描述了当前市场上词典内容的“去文本化”,并对最近涉及词典的新闻报道进行了定性回顾,以确定使用词典内容的不同场景如何影响公众对词典的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Decontextualized Dictionary in the Public Eye
ABSTRACT:The advent of third-party licensing and aggregation has provided larger audiences for dictionary content and new revenue opportunities for publishers, but it also disrupts the notion of the dictionary as a self-contained source of information and introduces new intermediaries between dictionary makers and dictionary users. At the same time, the public statements of dictionary brands in traditional and social media expand the public perception of what the dictionary is. This article describes the "decontextualization" of dictionary content in the current market and presents a qualitative review of recent news stories involving dictionaries to identify themes in how the different scenarios in which dictionary content is used affect reception of dictionaries by the public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dictionaries
Dictionaries Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Compiling The Oxford Dictionary of African American English: A Progress Report E. Ward Gilman: In Memoriam Editorial The Velar Nasal in thing and think: Evidence from Thomas Spence's (1775) Pronouncing Dictionary for the Eighteenth-Century English Phonology Database What is new in EDD Online 4.0?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1