经颈动脉重建术后立即发生的血流动力学不稳定。

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-26 DOI:10.1177/17085381221105178
Thomas A Kania, Aaquib Noorani, Amandeep Juneja, Seleshi Demissie, Kuldeep Singh, Jonathan Deitch, Yana Etkin, Gregg S Landis, Jonathan Schor
{"title":"经颈动脉重建术后立即发生的血流动力学不稳定。","authors":"Thomas A Kania, Aaquib Noorani, Amandeep Juneja, Seleshi Demissie, Kuldeep Singh, Jonathan Deitch, Yana Etkin, Gregg S Landis, Jonathan Schor","doi":"10.1177/17085381221105178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a relatively recent development in the management of carotid artery occlusive disease, the utilization of which is becoming more prevalent. This study aims to evaluate the timing, prevalence, and types of hemodynamic instability after TCAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all TCAR procedures performed at two tertiary care academic medical centers within a single hospital system from 2017 through 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative patient factors, procedural details, and postoperative data were collected. Patients were assessed over 24 hours postoperatively for stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hemodynamic instability at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hour intervals. Hemodynamic instability was defined as any vital sign abnormality which required pharmacological intervention with antihypertensive, vasopressor, and/or anti-arrhythmic agents. The incidence and timing of postoperative complications and hemodynamic instability were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 76 patients 80 TCAR procedures. Out of 80 procedures, 64 (80.0%) were receiving home antihypertensive medication and 28 (35.0%) were symptomatic lesions preoperatively. Intraoperatively, one patient (1.3%) received atropine, 26 (32.5%) received glycopyrrolate, 76 (95%) underwent predilatation, and 16 (20.0%) underwent postdilatation. Postoperatively, a total of 22 cases (27.5%) required medication for acute control of blood pressure or heart rate, which reached a peak of 19 patients (23.8%) within the first 3 hours, and tapered to nine patients (11.3%) by the 24 hour mark. A total of three patients (3.75%) required initiation of pharmacological management after the three-hour mark. Six patients (7.5%) underwent stroke code workup, 4 (5.0%) of whom were confirmed to have stroke on CT. Average time to neurologic event was 3.9 hours. No patients experienced MI or death. Median ICU and hospital days for unstable patients were two and three, respectively, compared to one and one for stable patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemodynamic instability is common after TCAR and reliably presents at or before postoperative hour 3. Hypo- followed by hyper-tension were the most common manifestations of hemodynamic instability. Regardless, unstable patients and stroke patients were more likely to require longer periods of time in the ICU and in the hospital overall. This may have implications for postoperative ICU resource management when deciding to transfer patients out of a monitored setting. Further study is required to establish relationships between pre- and intra-operative risk factors and outcomes such as hemodynamic instability and/or stroke. At present, one should proceed with careful evaluation of preoperative medications, strict management of postoperative hemodynamics, and clear communication among team members should all be employed to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":748,"journal":{"name":"Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics","volume":"11 2","pages":"1151-1160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic instability in the immediate postoperative setting after transcarotid artery revascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Kania, Aaquib Noorani, Amandeep Juneja, Seleshi Demissie, Kuldeep Singh, Jonathan Deitch, Yana Etkin, Gregg S Landis, Jonathan Schor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381221105178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a relatively recent development in the management of carotid artery occlusive disease, the utilization of which is becoming more prevalent. This study aims to evaluate the timing, prevalence, and types of hemodynamic instability after TCAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all TCAR procedures performed at two tertiary care academic medical centers within a single hospital system from 2017 through 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative patient factors, procedural details, and postoperative data were collected. Patients were assessed over 24 hours postoperatively for stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hemodynamic instability at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hour intervals. Hemodynamic instability was defined as any vital sign abnormality which required pharmacological intervention with antihypertensive, vasopressor, and/or anti-arrhythmic agents. The incidence and timing of postoperative complications and hemodynamic instability were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 76 patients 80 TCAR procedures. Out of 80 procedures, 64 (80.0%) were receiving home antihypertensive medication and 28 (35.0%) were symptomatic lesions preoperatively. Intraoperatively, one patient (1.3%) received atropine, 26 (32.5%) received glycopyrrolate, 76 (95%) underwent predilatation, and 16 (20.0%) underwent postdilatation. Postoperatively, a total of 22 cases (27.5%) required medication for acute control of blood pressure or heart rate, which reached a peak of 19 patients (23.8%) within the first 3 hours, and tapered to nine patients (11.3%) by the 24 hour mark. A total of three patients (3.75%) required initiation of pharmacological management after the three-hour mark. Six patients (7.5%) underwent stroke code workup, 4 (5.0%) of whom were confirmed to have stroke on CT. Average time to neurologic event was 3.9 hours. No patients experienced MI or death. Median ICU and hospital days for unstable patients were two and three, respectively, compared to one and one for stable patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemodynamic instability is common after TCAR and reliably presents at or before postoperative hour 3. Hypo- followed by hyper-tension were the most common manifestations of hemodynamic instability. Regardless, unstable patients and stroke patients were more likely to require longer periods of time in the ICU and in the hospital overall. This may have implications for postoperative ICU resource management when deciding to transfer patients out of a monitored setting. Further study is required to establish relationships between pre- and intra-operative risk factors and outcomes such as hemodynamic instability and/or stroke. At present, one should proceed with careful evaluation of preoperative medications, strict management of postoperative hemodynamics, and clear communication among team members should all be employed to optimize outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"1151-1160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381221105178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381221105178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的经颈动脉重建术(TCAR)是治疗颈动脉闭塞性疾病的一项相对较新的发展,其应用正变得越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估TCAR术后血流动力学不稳定的时间、患病率和类型。方法:我们对2017年至2019年在单一医院系统内的两个三级医疗学术医疗中心进行的所有TCAR手术进行了回顾性回顾。收集了人口统计学、合并症、术前患者因素、手术细节和术后数据。患者术后24小时内分别在3、6、9、12和24小时间隔评估卒中、死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和血流动力学不稳定性。血流动力学不稳定被定义为任何生命体征异常,需要使用抗高血压、血管加压药和/或抗心律失常药物进行药物干预。记录术后并发症和血流动力学不稳定的发生率和时间。结果在研究期间,76例患者接受了TCAR手术。80例患者中,64例(80.0%)接受家庭降压药物治疗,28例(35.0%)术前出现症状性病变。术中1例(1.3%)患者使用阿托品,26例(32.5%)患者使用甘罗酸酯,76例(95%)患者使用预扩张,16例(20.0%)患者使用扩张后。术后共有22例(27.5%)患者需要药物进行血压或心率的急性控制,其中前3小时内达到高峰19例(23.8%),24小时后逐渐减少至9例(11.3%)。共有3名患者(3.75%)需要在3小时后开始药物治疗。6例(7.5%)患者接受脑卒中编码检查,其中4例(5.0%)CT确诊脑卒中。发生神经系统事件的平均时间为3.9小时。没有患者发生心肌梗死或死亡。不稳定患者的中位数ICU和住院天数分别为2天和3天,而稳定患者的中位数ICU和住院天数分别为1天和1天。结论TCAR术后血流动力学不稳定是常见的,并在术后3小时或之前可靠地出现。血流动力学不稳定最常见的表现是血压过低后再升高。无论如何,不稳定患者和中风患者更有可能需要在ICU和医院的更长时间。当决定将患者转出监护环境时,这可能对术后ICU资源管理有影响。需要进一步的研究来确定术前和术中危险因素与血流动力学不稳定和/或卒中等预后之间的关系。目前,术前用药的仔细评估,术后血流动力学的严格管理,团队成员之间的明确沟通都应该被用来优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hemodynamic instability in the immediate postoperative setting after transcarotid artery revascularization.

Objective: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a relatively recent development in the management of carotid artery occlusive disease, the utilization of which is becoming more prevalent. This study aims to evaluate the timing, prevalence, and types of hemodynamic instability after TCAR.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all TCAR procedures performed at two tertiary care academic medical centers within a single hospital system from 2017 through 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative patient factors, procedural details, and postoperative data were collected. Patients were assessed over 24 hours postoperatively for stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hemodynamic instability at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hour intervals. Hemodynamic instability was defined as any vital sign abnormality which required pharmacological intervention with antihypertensive, vasopressor, and/or anti-arrhythmic agents. The incidence and timing of postoperative complications and hemodynamic instability were recorded.

Results: During the study period, 76 patients 80 TCAR procedures. Out of 80 procedures, 64 (80.0%) were receiving home antihypertensive medication and 28 (35.0%) were symptomatic lesions preoperatively. Intraoperatively, one patient (1.3%) received atropine, 26 (32.5%) received glycopyrrolate, 76 (95%) underwent predilatation, and 16 (20.0%) underwent postdilatation. Postoperatively, a total of 22 cases (27.5%) required medication for acute control of blood pressure or heart rate, which reached a peak of 19 patients (23.8%) within the first 3 hours, and tapered to nine patients (11.3%) by the 24 hour mark. A total of three patients (3.75%) required initiation of pharmacological management after the three-hour mark. Six patients (7.5%) underwent stroke code workup, 4 (5.0%) of whom were confirmed to have stroke on CT. Average time to neurologic event was 3.9 hours. No patients experienced MI or death. Median ICU and hospital days for unstable patients were two and three, respectively, compared to one and one for stable patients.

Conclusions: Hemodynamic instability is common after TCAR and reliably presents at or before postoperative hour 3. Hypo- followed by hyper-tension were the most common manifestations of hemodynamic instability. Regardless, unstable patients and stroke patients were more likely to require longer periods of time in the ICU and in the hospital overall. This may have implications for postoperative ICU resource management when deciding to transfer patients out of a monitored setting. Further study is required to establish relationships between pre- and intra-operative risk factors and outcomes such as hemodynamic instability and/or stroke. At present, one should proceed with careful evaluation of preoperative medications, strict management of postoperative hemodynamics, and clear communication among team members should all be employed to optimize outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics
Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-PHYSICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics contains the most recent and best Russian research on topics such as: Radio astronomy; Plasma astrophysics; Ionospheric, atmospheric and oceanic physics; Radiowave propagation; Quantum radiophysics; Pphysics of oscillations and waves; Physics of plasmas; Statistical radiophysics; Electrodynamics; Vacuum and plasma electronics; Acoustics; Solid-state electronics. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics is a translation of the Russian journal Izvestiya VUZ. Radiofizika, published by the Radiophysical Research Institute and N.I. Lobachevsky State University at Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia. The Russian volume-year is published in English beginning in April. All articles are peer-reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Scalable Quantum Processor Based on Superconducting Fluxonium Qubits Integrated Circuits for Quantum Machine Learning Based on Superconducting Artificial Atoms and Methods of Their Control Waveguide Integrated Superconducting Single-Photon Detector For Photonic And Ion Quantum Processors And Neuromorphic Computing The Influence of Cyclic Deformation on Elastic and Acoustic Properties of Chromium-Nickel Steels Development of a Microwave Diagnostic Method for Measurements of the Free-Surface Velocity in the Plane-Wave Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1