阿曼走向批判性扫盲教育的道路

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.1080/1358684X.2022.2069546
Nazanin Dehdary
{"title":"阿曼走向批判性扫盲教育的道路","authors":"Nazanin Dehdary","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2069546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT On the path towards transformatory approaches to education and empowerment of students and teachers, this study made an attempt to explore literacy and critical literacy (CL) from the perspectives of teachers working in a tertiary institution in Oman. For this research, an exploratory research design with a critical stance was employed. Interviews were used as the main method of data collection to examine multiple interpretations of literacy and to look into teachers’ familiarity with the concept of critical literacy. This study suggests that literacy is a complex concept with different readings. Another finding is the novelty of critical literacy, and its potential to be confused with critical thinking. This study illuminates the fact that CL is on the margin of ELT methodology and that literacy should be viewed as a social practice, as adopting this view can facilitate the integration of CL in education.","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":"25 12","pages":"297 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Path Towards a Critical Literacy-Based Pedagogy in Oman\",\"authors\":\"Nazanin Dehdary\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2069546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT On the path towards transformatory approaches to education and empowerment of students and teachers, this study made an attempt to explore literacy and critical literacy (CL) from the perspectives of teachers working in a tertiary institution in Oman. For this research, an exploratory research design with a critical stance was employed. Interviews were used as the main method of data collection to examine multiple interpretations of literacy and to look into teachers’ familiarity with the concept of critical literacy. This study suggests that literacy is a complex concept with different readings. Another finding is the novelty of critical literacy, and its potential to be confused with critical thinking. This study illuminates the fact that CL is on the margin of ELT methodology and that literacy should be viewed as a social practice, as adopting this view can facilitate the integration of CL in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"297 - 309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2069546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2069546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在通往教育和赋予学生和教师权力的转型方法的道路上,本研究试图从阿曼高等教育机构教师的角度探讨读写能力和批判性读写能力(CL)。本研究采用批判性立场的探索性研究设计。访谈是数据收集的主要方法,以检验对读写能力的多种解释,并调查教师对批判性读写能力概念的熟悉程度。这项研究表明,读写能力是一个复杂的概念,有不同的阅读方式。另一个发现是批判性读写的新颖性,以及它可能与批判性思维相混淆。本研究阐明了CL处于英语教学方法论的边缘,识字应该被视为一种社会实践,因为采用这种观点可以促进CL在教育中的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Path Towards a Critical Literacy-Based Pedagogy in Oman
ABSTRACT On the path towards transformatory approaches to education and empowerment of students and teachers, this study made an attempt to explore literacy and critical literacy (CL) from the perspectives of teachers working in a tertiary institution in Oman. For this research, an exploratory research design with a critical stance was employed. Interviews were used as the main method of data collection to examine multiple interpretations of literacy and to look into teachers’ familiarity with the concept of critical literacy. This study suggests that literacy is a complex concept with different readings. Another finding is the novelty of critical literacy, and its potential to be confused with critical thinking. This study illuminates the fact that CL is on the margin of ELT methodology and that literacy should be viewed as a social practice, as adopting this view can facilitate the integration of CL in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
From the Derived to the Deviant: A Translation-Based Creative Writing Pedagogy Teaching Fairy Tales Old and New: Revisiting Andersen via Emma Donoghue What Keeps a Narrative going? Teaching Narrative Interest Knowledge and English A Philosophical Enquiry into Subject English and Creative Writing , by Oli Belas, London, Routledge, 2023, 146 pp., Hardback £120; £35.09 (ebook), ISBN 978-0367-48736-2 Students’ Understanding of Role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1