B. Apostol, S. Chivulescu, Albert Ciceu, Marius Petrila, Ionuț-Silviu Pascu, E. Apostol, Ș. Leca, A. Lorenț, M. Tanase, O. Badea
{"title":"森林清查的数据收集方法:综合传统设备与地面激光扫描的比较","authors":"B. Apostol, S. Chivulescu, Albert Ciceu, Marius Petrila, Ionuț-Silviu Pascu, E. Apostol, Ș. Leca, A. Lorenț, M. Tanase, O. Badea","doi":"10.15287/AFR.2018.1189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to present a comparison analysis of two data collection methods that can be used in order to obtain reference ground truth data for forestry – a conventional method that uses specific equipment such as Field Map system, caliper and vertex inclinometer and a modern method based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology. The research was conducted in six circular Permanent Plots (PPs) with an area of 500 square meters each, within thinning and selected cuttings stands of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), all situated in the Southern Carpathians (Mihăești, Mușeteși and Vidraru Forest Districts). Using the conventional method, the dendrometric tree characteristics such as height, diameter at breast height (dbh) and tree position were directly recorded in the field. As a modern method for data collection, a Faro Focus3D X 130 HDR terrestrial laser scanning device was used to scan each plot and to extract the dbh and height of the trees. In this regard, two scanning approaches were used - single scan (SS) and multiple scan (MS). In order to compare the two data acquisitions methods, we applied a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis on the basis of which we could establish the pros and cons of using the two methods. Therefore, one can choose the most advantageous method for obtaining the reference data for forestry, in terms of equipment acquisition cost, personnel skills and qualifications, data collection working time, accuracy of the data recorded, post processing time, labor costs. Although the use of TLS in forest inventory is a technology with high potential, further investigations need to be done, especially in the case of automatic extraction of the tree height. For accurate reference ground data for forest inventory purposes, we still recommend using the conventional methods although they are time consuming.","PeriodicalId":48954,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Forest Research","volume":"838 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data collection methods for forest inventory: a comparison between an integrated conventional equipment and terrestrial laser scanning\",\"authors\":\"B. Apostol, S. Chivulescu, Albert Ciceu, Marius Petrila, Ionuț-Silviu Pascu, E. Apostol, Ș. Leca, A. Lorenț, M. Tanase, O. Badea\",\"doi\":\"10.15287/AFR.2018.1189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to present a comparison analysis of two data collection methods that can be used in order to obtain reference ground truth data for forestry – a conventional method that uses specific equipment such as Field Map system, caliper and vertex inclinometer and a modern method based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology. The research was conducted in six circular Permanent Plots (PPs) with an area of 500 square meters each, within thinning and selected cuttings stands of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), all situated in the Southern Carpathians (Mihăești, Mușeteși and Vidraru Forest Districts). Using the conventional method, the dendrometric tree characteristics such as height, diameter at breast height (dbh) and tree position were directly recorded in the field. As a modern method for data collection, a Faro Focus3D X 130 HDR terrestrial laser scanning device was used to scan each plot and to extract the dbh and height of the trees. In this regard, two scanning approaches were used - single scan (SS) and multiple scan (MS). In order to compare the two data acquisitions methods, we applied a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis on the basis of which we could establish the pros and cons of using the two methods. Therefore, one can choose the most advantageous method for obtaining the reference data for forestry, in terms of equipment acquisition cost, personnel skills and qualifications, data collection working time, accuracy of the data recorded, post processing time, labor costs. Although the use of TLS in forest inventory is a technology with high potential, further investigations need to be done, especially in the case of automatic extraction of the tree height. For accurate reference ground data for forest inventory purposes, we still recommend using the conventional methods although they are time consuming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Forest Research\",\"volume\":\"838 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Forest Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15287/AFR.2018.1189\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15287/AFR.2018.1189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
本研究旨在比较分析两种可用于获取林业参考地物真值数据的数据收集方法-传统的使用特定设备的方法,如野外地图系统,卡尺和顶点倾角仪和基于地面激光扫描(TLS)技术的现代方法。研究在六个圆形永久样地(PPs)中进行,每个样地面积为500平方米,在疏伐和选择的无根栎(栎)扦插林中进行。Liebl.),普通山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)和挪威云杉(Picea abies L. Karst.),均位于南喀尔巴阡山脉(Mihăești, Mușeteși和Vidraru林区)。采用常规方法,直接在野外记录树木的树高、胸径(dbh)和树位等特征。作为一种现代的数据收集方法,使用Faro Focus3D X 130 HDR地面激光扫描设备扫描每个地块并提取树木的胸径和高度。在这方面,采用了两种扫描方法-单扫描(SS)和多次扫描(MS)。为了比较两种数据获取方法,我们应用了优势,劣势,机会,威胁(SWOT)分析,在此基础上,我们可以建立使用这两种方法的优点和缺点。因此,可以从设备购置成本、人员技能和资质、数据采集工作时间、数据记录的准确性、后期处理时间、人工成本等方面选择最有利的方法获取林业参考数据。虽然在森林清查中使用TLS是一项很有潜力的技术,但还需要做进一步的研究,特别是在自动提取树高的情况下。为了获得森林清查所需的准确参考地面数据,我们仍然建议使用传统方法,尽管它们很耗时。
Data collection methods for forest inventory: a comparison between an integrated conventional equipment and terrestrial laser scanning
This study aims to present a comparison analysis of two data collection methods that can be used in order to obtain reference ground truth data for forestry – a conventional method that uses specific equipment such as Field Map system, caliper and vertex inclinometer and a modern method based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology. The research was conducted in six circular Permanent Plots (PPs) with an area of 500 square meters each, within thinning and selected cuttings stands of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), all situated in the Southern Carpathians (Mihăești, Mușeteși and Vidraru Forest Districts). Using the conventional method, the dendrometric tree characteristics such as height, diameter at breast height (dbh) and tree position were directly recorded in the field. As a modern method for data collection, a Faro Focus3D X 130 HDR terrestrial laser scanning device was used to scan each plot and to extract the dbh and height of the trees. In this regard, two scanning approaches were used - single scan (SS) and multiple scan (MS). In order to compare the two data acquisitions methods, we applied a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis on the basis of which we could establish the pros and cons of using the two methods. Therefore, one can choose the most advantageous method for obtaining the reference data for forestry, in terms of equipment acquisition cost, personnel skills and qualifications, data collection working time, accuracy of the data recorded, post processing time, labor costs. Although the use of TLS in forest inventory is a technology with high potential, further investigations need to be done, especially in the case of automatic extraction of the tree height. For accurate reference ground data for forest inventory purposes, we still recommend using the conventional methods although they are time consuming.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Forest Research is a semestrial open access journal, which publishes research articles, research notes and critical review papers, exclusively in English, on topics dealing with forestry and environmental sciences. The journal promotes high scientific level articles, by following international editorial conventions and by applying a peer-review selection process.