在城市一级输血前相容性测试的类型和筛选政策的效用Ι顶点创伤中心

Rahul Chaurasia, N. Akhtar, S. Arulselvi, V. Arya, Sulekha Karjee
{"title":"在城市一级输血前相容性测试的类型和筛选政策的效用Ι顶点创伤中心","authors":"Rahul Chaurasia, N. Akhtar, S. Arulselvi, V. Arya, Sulekha Karjee","doi":"10.34172/jept.2021.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Type and crossmatch (TC) policy is the most common approach for pre-transfusion compatibility testing prior to issue of blood for transfusion. As it involves reserving of the blood units (usually up to 72 hours) prior to issue or un-reserving, it can lead to excessive blood cross matching, inventory management problems, undue workload, blood outdating and reagent wastage. Type and screen (TS) policy is an alternative approach without the need to cross match and reserve blood units prior to issue. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively assess the impact of the implementation of TS policy for pre-transfusion compatibility testing on blood transfusion services at an urban level Ι trauma center. Methods: The study was done in two phases in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Transfusion data was collected and compared during two phases: initial phase (Oct 2016-Mar 2017) of TC policy and second phase (Apr 2017-Sept 2017) of TS policy. Results: TS policy resulted in the reduction of C:T ratio from 5.3 to 1.9. Transfusion probability increased to 29.5% during TS policy from 23.6% during TC policy. Issuable stock index (ISI) also showed reduction from 12.5 to 11.4 after TS policy. Wastage as percentage of issue (WAPI) was reduced from 2.3% (TC) to 1.3% (TS). TS policy also led to reduction in expenses incurred on pre-transfusion compatibility testing by 35%. No hemolytic transfusion reaction was reported during the study. Conclusion: TS policy was found to be a safe and an efficient alternative approach to TC policy for pre-transfusion compatibility at our center. We recommend the implementation of TS policy, but each center should first assess its feasibility based on patient population, blood bank resources and staff knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of type and screen policy for pretransfusion compatibility testing at an urban level Ι apex trauma center\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Chaurasia, N. Akhtar, S. Arulselvi, V. Arya, Sulekha Karjee\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jept.2021.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Type and crossmatch (TC) policy is the most common approach for pre-transfusion compatibility testing prior to issue of blood for transfusion. As it involves reserving of the blood units (usually up to 72 hours) prior to issue or un-reserving, it can lead to excessive blood cross matching, inventory management problems, undue workload, blood outdating and reagent wastage. Type and screen (TS) policy is an alternative approach without the need to cross match and reserve blood units prior to issue. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively assess the impact of the implementation of TS policy for pre-transfusion compatibility testing on blood transfusion services at an urban level Ι trauma center. Methods: The study was done in two phases in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Transfusion data was collected and compared during two phases: initial phase (Oct 2016-Mar 2017) of TC policy and second phase (Apr 2017-Sept 2017) of TS policy. Results: TS policy resulted in the reduction of C:T ratio from 5.3 to 1.9. Transfusion probability increased to 29.5% during TS policy from 23.6% during TC policy. Issuable stock index (ISI) also showed reduction from 12.5 to 11.4 after TS policy. Wastage as percentage of issue (WAPI) was reduced from 2.3% (TC) to 1.3% (TS). TS policy also led to reduction in expenses incurred on pre-transfusion compatibility testing by 35%. No hemolytic transfusion reaction was reported during the study. Conclusion: TS policy was found to be a safe and an efficient alternative approach to TC policy for pre-transfusion compatibility at our center. We recommend the implementation of TS policy, but each center should first assess its feasibility based on patient population, blood bank resources and staff knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2021.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2021.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:类型和交叉配型(TC)政策是在输血前进行输血前兼容性测试的最常见方法。由于它涉及在发放或取消储备前储备血液单位(通常长达72小时),可能会导致过度的血液交叉匹配、库存管理问题、过度的工作量、血液过期和试剂浪费。类型和筛选(TS)策略是一种替代方法,无需在发布前交叉匹配和储备血液单位。本研究的目的是回顾性评估TS政策对城市创伤中心输血服务的影响。方法:该研究在印度新德里Jai Prakash Narayan Apex创伤中心的输血医学科分两个阶段进行。在两个阶段收集并比较了输血数据:TC政策的初始阶段(2016年10月至2017年3月)和TS政策的第二阶段(2017年4月至2017月至9月)。结果:TS政策使C:T比率从5.3降低到1.9。TS政策期间的输血概率从TC政策期间的23.6%增加到29.5%。TS政策实施后,可发行股票指数(ISI)也从12.5降至11.4。浪费占问题的百分比(WAPI)从2.3%(TC)降低到1.3%(TS)。TS政策还使输血前兼容性测试的费用减少了35%。研究期间未报告溶血性输血反应。结论:在我们中心,TS策略是一种安全有效的TC策略的替代方法。我们建议实施TS政策,但每个中心应首先根据患者群体、血库资源和员工知识评估其可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of type and screen policy for pretransfusion compatibility testing at an urban level Ι apex trauma center
Objective: Type and crossmatch (TC) policy is the most common approach for pre-transfusion compatibility testing prior to issue of blood for transfusion. As it involves reserving of the blood units (usually up to 72 hours) prior to issue or un-reserving, it can lead to excessive blood cross matching, inventory management problems, undue workload, blood outdating and reagent wastage. Type and screen (TS) policy is an alternative approach without the need to cross match and reserve blood units prior to issue. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively assess the impact of the implementation of TS policy for pre-transfusion compatibility testing on blood transfusion services at an urban level Ι trauma center. Methods: The study was done in two phases in the Department of Transfusion Medicine at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center AIIMS, New Delhi, India. Transfusion data was collected and compared during two phases: initial phase (Oct 2016-Mar 2017) of TC policy and second phase (Apr 2017-Sept 2017) of TS policy. Results: TS policy resulted in the reduction of C:T ratio from 5.3 to 1.9. Transfusion probability increased to 29.5% during TS policy from 23.6% during TC policy. Issuable stock index (ISI) also showed reduction from 12.5 to 11.4 after TS policy. Wastage as percentage of issue (WAPI) was reduced from 2.3% (TC) to 1.3% (TS). TS policy also led to reduction in expenses incurred on pre-transfusion compatibility testing by 35%. No hemolytic transfusion reaction was reported during the study. Conclusion: TS policy was found to be a safe and an efficient alternative approach to TC policy for pre-transfusion compatibility at our center. We recommend the implementation of TS policy, but each center should first assess its feasibility based on patient population, blood bank resources and staff knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rhabdomyolysis following electical injury without acute kidney injury Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients Using Weibull model of survival analysis workflow and its relevant factors: A prospective cohort study Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration Post-traumatic growth and perceived social support in young adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1