输入/输出强化指令对混合式学习中词汇和语法增益的影响

IF 0.4 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Research Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.17250/khisli.36..201909.005
Jeong-Ryeol Kim, Young-hee Kim
{"title":"输入/输出强化指令对混合式学习中词汇和语法增益的影响","authors":"Jeong-Ryeol Kim, Young-hee Kim","doi":"10.17250/khisli.36..201909.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kim, Jeong-ryeol and Young-hee Kim. 2019. The effects of input/ output enhanced instructions on vocabulary and grammar gains in blended learning. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 107-122. This paper is to examine the effects of the enhanced input and output on the acquisition of English grammatical items. To this end, input-enhanced instruction (processing instruction) with an output-enhanced instruction (dictogloss) was compared wherein the instruction is blended of offand on-line classes. A total of 90 university students were assigned to three different classes, where one was meaning-based instruction, another input-enhanced group, and the last another output-enhanced group. The meaning-focused group used a video clip watching and performing ensuing activities for comprehension without any input or output treatment of the text in both onand off-line. The input-enhanced group used audio tweaking enhancement techniques such as speed and volume adjustments, while the output-enhanced group performed dictogloss tasks in both onand off-line. An immediate posttest after the semester was administered to assess the learners’ gain on vocabulary and grammar. The results gleaned that both input and output-enhanced groups performed significantly better in at least one component, but not both. The input group outperformed both meaning-focused group and output group in grammar gains, while the output group performed better in vocabulary gains. Pedagogic implications drawn from the current study are to teach vocabulary and grammar in two different blended modes of enhancement. (Korea National University of Education · Chungwoon University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of input/output enhanced instructions on vocabulary and grammar gains in blended learning\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Ryeol Kim, Young-hee Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17250/khisli.36..201909.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kim, Jeong-ryeol and Young-hee Kim. 2019. The effects of input/ output enhanced instructions on vocabulary and grammar gains in blended learning. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 107-122. This paper is to examine the effects of the enhanced input and output on the acquisition of English grammatical items. To this end, input-enhanced instruction (processing instruction) with an output-enhanced instruction (dictogloss) was compared wherein the instruction is blended of offand on-line classes. A total of 90 university students were assigned to three different classes, where one was meaning-based instruction, another input-enhanced group, and the last another output-enhanced group. The meaning-focused group used a video clip watching and performing ensuing activities for comprehension without any input or output treatment of the text in both onand off-line. The input-enhanced group used audio tweaking enhancement techniques such as speed and volume adjustments, while the output-enhanced group performed dictogloss tasks in both onand off-line. An immediate posttest after the semester was administered to assess the learners’ gain on vocabulary and grammar. The results gleaned that both input and output-enhanced groups performed significantly better in at least one component, but not both. The input group outperformed both meaning-focused group and output group in grammar gains, while the output group performed better in vocabulary gains. Pedagogic implications drawn from the current study are to teach vocabulary and grammar in two different blended modes of enhancement. (Korea National University of Education · Chungwoon University)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36..201909.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36..201909.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

金正烈,金英姬,2019。输入/输出强化指令对混合式学习中词汇和语法增益的影响。语言学研究36(特别版),107-122。本文旨在探讨强化输入输出对英语语法项目习得的影响。为此,比较了输入增强指令(处理指令)和输出增强指令(dictogloss),其中指令混合了离线和在线课程。共有90名大学生被分配到三个不同的班级,其中一个是基于意义的教学,另一个是输入增强组,最后一个是输出增强组。以意义为中心的小组通过观看视频片段并进行随后的理解活动,而无需在线和离线对文本进行任何输入或输出处理。输入增强组使用音频调整增强技术,如速度和音量调节,而输出增强组在在线和离线情况下都执行语音注释任务。学期结束后立即进行后测,以评估学习者在词汇和语法方面的收获。结果表明,输入增强组和输出增强组至少在一个方面的表现都明显更好,但不是两者都更好。输入组在语法方面的表现优于语义组和输出组,而输出组在词汇方面的表现更好。从目前的研究中得出的教育学启示是在两种不同的混合增强模式下教授词汇和语法。(韩国师范大学·忠云大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of input/output enhanced instructions on vocabulary and grammar gains in blended learning
Kim, Jeong-ryeol and Young-hee Kim. 2019. The effects of input/ output enhanced instructions on vocabulary and grammar gains in blended learning. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 107-122. This paper is to examine the effects of the enhanced input and output on the acquisition of English grammatical items. To this end, input-enhanced instruction (processing instruction) with an output-enhanced instruction (dictogloss) was compared wherein the instruction is blended of offand on-line classes. A total of 90 university students were assigned to three different classes, where one was meaning-based instruction, another input-enhanced group, and the last another output-enhanced group. The meaning-focused group used a video clip watching and performing ensuing activities for comprehension without any input or output treatment of the text in both onand off-line. The input-enhanced group used audio tweaking enhancement techniques such as speed and volume adjustments, while the output-enhanced group performed dictogloss tasks in both onand off-line. An immediate posttest after the semester was administered to assess the learners’ gain on vocabulary and grammar. The results gleaned that both input and output-enhanced groups performed significantly better in at least one component, but not both. The input group outperformed both meaning-focused group and output group in grammar gains, while the output group performed better in vocabulary gains. Pedagogic implications drawn from the current study are to teach vocabulary and grammar in two different blended modes of enhancement. (Korea National University of Education · Chungwoon University)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Overt subject NPs as a contrast marker in Korean discourse Keyword analyses of English charter parties How do speakers of different languages differ in the encoding of complex motion events Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence Loanword adaptation of English coronal fricatives into Mandarin Chinese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1