Necia Parker-Gibson
{"title":"FoodCorps, Inc. (https://foodcorps.org)","authors":"Necia Parker-Gibson","doi":"10.1080/10496505.2020.1723384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food insecurity, what the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) terms low or very low food security, affects a frighteningly high percentage of families, more than 15% in 2018 (Coleman-Jensen, Rabbitt, Gregory, & Singh, 2019). Malnutrition, whether due to poverty, food deserts, or other factors, is nearly as common despite efforts to correct it. When the nutrients in food, such as vitamins, were first beginning to be understood, as many as one-third of schoolchildren were found to be malnourished (Read & Palmer, 1923). These authors vehemently considered childhood malnutrition to be a national concern, “To fail the undernourished child is but to fail the nation!” (Read & Palmer, 1923, p. 28). The problems present then and now include diets that lack variety, and specifically lack fruits and vegetables. School gardens can, in part, remedy these deficiencies. School lunches are part of what the USDA Economic Research Service labels as Food Away from Home (FAFH). Dining out is frequently higher in calories, salt, fat, and sugar per meal, compared to home-cooked meals (Saksena et al., 2018). School food sometimes suffers the same faults as other FAFH—especially when the food arrives at the school packaged and pre-portioned. School lunch programs are driven by policy and law, by cost, preparation and cooking time, and by what appeals to the students. There have been efforts for decades to associate gardens with schools as a source of fruits and vegetables, to provide opportunities for hands-on experiments and STEM education, and to provide physical, social, and psychological benefits. Kohlstedt (2008) describes a school gardening movement starting in the 1890s; she cites John Dewey as a proponent of using gardens to help cross the barrier between school learning and life skills. Blair specifies: “The purposes of the redesigned schoolyard are academic, behavioral, recreational, social (increased sense of belonging, self-esteem, and compassion), political (the schoolyard as a visible community asset), and environmental remediation” (2009, p. 16). Most current school garden programs belong to a single school and are run by parents, teachers, and","PeriodicalId":43986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","volume":"21 1","pages":"14 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2020.1723384","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2020.1723384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粮食不安全,美国农业部称之为低或极低的粮食安全,影响的家庭比例高得吓人,2018年超过15%(Coleman-Jensen,Rabbitt,Gregory,&Singh,2019)。营养不良,无论是由于贫困、食物沙漠还是其他因素,尽管努力纠正,但几乎同样常见。当食物中的营养素,如维生素,第一次被了解时,多达三分之一的学童被发现营养不良(Read&Palmer,1923)。这些作者强烈认为儿童营养不良是一个国家关注的问题,“辜负营养不良的儿童就是辜负国家!”(Read&Palmer,1923年,第28页)。当时和现在存在的问题包括饮食缺乏多样性,特别是缺乏水果和蔬菜。学校花园可以在一定程度上弥补这些不足。学校午餐是美国农业部经济研究服务局称之为“远离家乡的食物”(FAFH)的一部分。与家常菜相比,外出就餐每顿饭的热量、盐、脂肪和糖含量通常更高(Saksena等人,2018)。学校食品有时会遇到与其他FAFH相同的故障,尤其是当食品包装好并预先分配到学校时。学校午餐计划受政策和法律、成本、准备和烹饪时间以及对学生的吸引力的驱动。几十年来,人们一直在努力将花园与学校联系起来,作为水果和蔬菜的来源,为动手实验和STEM教育提供机会,并提供身体、社会和心理方面的好处。Kohlstedt(2008)描述了一场始于19世纪90年代的学校园艺运动;她引用了约翰·杜威的话,他主张利用花园来帮助跨越学校学习和生活技能之间的障碍。布莱尔指出:“重新设计的校园的目的是学术、行为、娱乐、社会(增强归属感、自尊和同情心)、政治(校园是一种可见的社区资产)和环境修复”(2009年,第16页)。目前大多数学校花园项目属于一所学校,由家长、教师和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FoodCorps, Inc. (https://foodcorps.org)
Food insecurity, what the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) terms low or very low food security, affects a frighteningly high percentage of families, more than 15% in 2018 (Coleman-Jensen, Rabbitt, Gregory, & Singh, 2019). Malnutrition, whether due to poverty, food deserts, or other factors, is nearly as common despite efforts to correct it. When the nutrients in food, such as vitamins, were first beginning to be understood, as many as one-third of schoolchildren were found to be malnourished (Read & Palmer, 1923). These authors vehemently considered childhood malnutrition to be a national concern, “To fail the undernourished child is but to fail the nation!” (Read & Palmer, 1923, p. 28). The problems present then and now include diets that lack variety, and specifically lack fruits and vegetables. School gardens can, in part, remedy these deficiencies. School lunches are part of what the USDA Economic Research Service labels as Food Away from Home (FAFH). Dining out is frequently higher in calories, salt, fat, and sugar per meal, compared to home-cooked meals (Saksena et al., 2018). School food sometimes suffers the same faults as other FAFH—especially when the food arrives at the school packaged and pre-portioned. School lunch programs are driven by policy and law, by cost, preparation and cooking time, and by what appeals to the students. There have been efforts for decades to associate gardens with schools as a source of fruits and vegetables, to provide opportunities for hands-on experiments and STEM education, and to provide physical, social, and psychological benefits. Kohlstedt (2008) describes a school gardening movement starting in the 1890s; she cites John Dewey as a proponent of using gardens to help cross the barrier between school learning and life skills. Blair specifies: “The purposes of the redesigned schoolyard are academic, behavioral, recreational, social (increased sense of belonging, self-esteem, and compassion), political (the schoolyard as a visible community asset), and environmental remediation” (2009, p. 16). Most current school garden programs belong to a single school and are run by parents, teachers, and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
The Development of Search Filters for One Health Articles Using CAB Abstracts Descriptors Agriculture-Related Courses in Canadian Universities: How Course Outlines Differ between Social Science and Science Faculties Review of Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa: Priorities for Science and Policy under Global Change Editorial An Analysis of Online Research Guides for Wine, Enology, and Viticulture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1