19世纪的流行歌曲。德里克·斯科特编辑。投票率:2022年布雷波尔斯。380页。ISBN: 978-2-503-60078-9

IF 0.7 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Popular Music Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1017/s0261143022000745
Oskar Cox Jensen
{"title":"19世纪的流行歌曲。德里克·斯科特编辑。投票率:2022年布雷波尔斯。380页。ISBN: 978-2-503-60078-9","authors":"Oskar Cox Jensen","doi":"10.1017/s0261143022000745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tions, categories and classifications in a way that inadvertently formulates a priori guidelines. Organisationally, this renders a disconnect between the majority of the book and the final chapters, which would perhaps stand better as a distinct article. There are quite a few moments of useful insight in this book. Popular debate does in many ways continue to revolve around a needless parsing of definitions; this book offers a unique corrective to that tendency. However, I would be remiss if I did not state that readers already familiar with existing scholarly literature will likely find A Philosophy of Cover Songs to be an intriguing if somewhat pedantic exercise. Ultimately, the kind of pragmatic pluralism Magnus argues for is already deployed by scholars in areas of popular music, communication, media studies and cultural studies (even if we do not explicitly name our approach with that term). And we have been doing so in more – and more contextually expansive – ways than are suggested by the author. Some of the definitive work on cover songs addresses concerns over (for example) copyright, historiography, race, the archive, changing practices of consumption, cross-cultural influence, postmodernism, commerce, aesthetics, changing technological formats, narrative recontextualisation and the relation between audience use and perceptions of value (Plasketes 2010; Popular Music and Society special issue, 2008). Indeed, pluralism (whether pragmatic or not) already defines our approach to cover songs.","PeriodicalId":46171,"journal":{"name":"Popular Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Popular Song in the 19th Century. Edited by Derek Scott. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022. 380 pp. ISBN: 978-2-503-60078-9\",\"authors\":\"Oskar Cox Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0261143022000745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tions, categories and classifications in a way that inadvertently formulates a priori guidelines. Organisationally, this renders a disconnect between the majority of the book and the final chapters, which would perhaps stand better as a distinct article. There are quite a few moments of useful insight in this book. Popular debate does in many ways continue to revolve around a needless parsing of definitions; this book offers a unique corrective to that tendency. However, I would be remiss if I did not state that readers already familiar with existing scholarly literature will likely find A Philosophy of Cover Songs to be an intriguing if somewhat pedantic exercise. Ultimately, the kind of pragmatic pluralism Magnus argues for is already deployed by scholars in areas of popular music, communication, media studies and cultural studies (even if we do not explicitly name our approach with that term). And we have been doing so in more – and more contextually expansive – ways than are suggested by the author. Some of the definitive work on cover songs addresses concerns over (for example) copyright, historiography, race, the archive, changing practices of consumption, cross-cultural influence, postmodernism, commerce, aesthetics, changing technological formats, narrative recontextualisation and the relation between audience use and perceptions of value (Plasketes 2010; Popular Music and Society special issue, 2008). Indeed, pluralism (whether pragmatic or not) already defines our approach to cover songs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Popular Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Popular Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143022000745\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Popular Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143022000745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以一种无意中形成先验准则的方式来描述,分类和分类。从组织上讲,这使得本书的大部分内容与最后几章之间脱节,而最后几章作为一篇独立的文章可能会更好。这本书中有不少有用的见解。在许多方面,流行的辩论确实继续围绕着对定义进行不必要的解析;这本书对这种倾向提供了独特的纠正。然而,如果我没有说明,已经熟悉现有学术文献的读者可能会发现《翻唱歌曲的哲学》是一本有趣的书,如果有点迂腐的话,那我就疏忽了。最终,马格努斯所主张的实用主义多元主义已经被流行音乐、传播、媒体研究和文化研究领域的学者们所采用(即使我们没有明确地用这个术语来命名我们的方法)。我们一直在用比作者建议的更多、更广泛的方式来做这件事。一些关于翻唱歌曲的权威作品涉及(例如)版权、史学、种族、档案、不断变化的消费实践、跨文化影响、后现代主义、商业、美学、不断变化的技术形式、叙事重新语境化以及听众使用与价值观念之间的关系(Plasketes 2010;流行音乐与社会特刊,2008年)。事实上,多元主义(不管实用与否)已经定义了我们翻唱歌曲的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Popular Song in the 19th Century. Edited by Derek Scott. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022. 380 pp. ISBN: 978-2-503-60078-9
tions, categories and classifications in a way that inadvertently formulates a priori guidelines. Organisationally, this renders a disconnect between the majority of the book and the final chapters, which would perhaps stand better as a distinct article. There are quite a few moments of useful insight in this book. Popular debate does in many ways continue to revolve around a needless parsing of definitions; this book offers a unique corrective to that tendency. However, I would be remiss if I did not state that readers already familiar with existing scholarly literature will likely find A Philosophy of Cover Songs to be an intriguing if somewhat pedantic exercise. Ultimately, the kind of pragmatic pluralism Magnus argues for is already deployed by scholars in areas of popular music, communication, media studies and cultural studies (even if we do not explicitly name our approach with that term). And we have been doing so in more – and more contextually expansive – ways than are suggested by the author. Some of the definitive work on cover songs addresses concerns over (for example) copyright, historiography, race, the archive, changing practices of consumption, cross-cultural influence, postmodernism, commerce, aesthetics, changing technological formats, narrative recontextualisation and the relation between audience use and perceptions of value (Plasketes 2010; Popular Music and Society special issue, 2008). Indeed, pluralism (whether pragmatic or not) already defines our approach to cover songs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Popular Music
Popular Music MUSIC-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Popular Music is an international multi-disciplinary journal covering all aspects of the subject - from the formation of social group identities through popular music, to the workings of the global music industry, to how particular pieces of music are put together. The journal includes all kinds of popular music, whether rap or rai, jazz or rock, from any historical era and any geographical location. Popular Music carries articles by scholars from a variety of disciplines and theoretical perspectives. Each issue contains substantial, authoritative and influential articles, topical pieces, and reviews of a wide range of books.
期刊最新文献
Fluid revivals: retouring popular songs to restore a hydrological imaginary in the trans-Danube Celtic music, Shakespeare and fandom The Greatest Rock and Soul Band in the World? The Rolling Stones, genre and race Listening to Mapuche sound in Illapu Kardeş Türküler as ‘art action’: The multiple cultural heritages of Anatolia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1