《统学》的哲学转向——以《诗学》伦理的外延为中心Sihyŏng

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Religions Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1353/jkr.2022.0001
Cho Sŏng-hwan
{"title":"《统学》的哲学转向——以《诗学》伦理的外延为中心Sihyŏng","authors":"Cho Sŏng-hwan","doi":"10.1353/jkr.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:One of the dominant understandings of Tonghak 東學 (Eastern Learning) in Korea is that it is a modern Confucianism. It has been suggested, for example, that Tonghak is a sort of popularized Confucianism, while others maintain Tonghak to be the perfect form of Confucianism. But there are different interpretations regarding Tonghak thought. In this study, I endeavor to show how Tonghak thought differs from Confucianism, focusing on Tonghak’s new interpretations of self, nature, and Heaven. Tonghak thought, especially according to Haewŏl 海月 Ch’oe Sihyŏng 崔時亨, presents naturalistic concepts of humans and things that differ from those of Confucianism, and they expand the object of ethics from humans to all things. In Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s philosophy, this forms the cosmology of chŏnji pumomanmul tongp’o 天地父母—萬物同胞 (Heaven and Earth are parents, all things are brothers) and the ethics of kyŏngmul 敬物 (respect for things). In this sense, one can position Tonghak as the beginning of a new Korean philosophy rather than as a form of popularized Confucianism. In the early twentieth century, Tonghak’s kaebyŏk movement was succeeded by Wŏn Buddhism, and in the late twentieth century, Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s thought developed into the Hansallim Movement (Hansallim undong), a cooperative movement based on Tonghak thought, as a solution to the modern ecological problems caused by industrialization.","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"13 1","pages":"29 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Philosophical Turn in Tonghak: Focusing on the Extension of Ethics of Ch’oe Sihyŏng\",\"authors\":\"Cho Sŏng-hwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jkr.2022.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:One of the dominant understandings of Tonghak 東學 (Eastern Learning) in Korea is that it is a modern Confucianism. It has been suggested, for example, that Tonghak is a sort of popularized Confucianism, while others maintain Tonghak to be the perfect form of Confucianism. But there are different interpretations regarding Tonghak thought. In this study, I endeavor to show how Tonghak thought differs from Confucianism, focusing on Tonghak’s new interpretations of self, nature, and Heaven. Tonghak thought, especially according to Haewŏl 海月 Ch’oe Sihyŏng 崔時亨, presents naturalistic concepts of humans and things that differ from those of Confucianism, and they expand the object of ethics from humans to all things. In Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s philosophy, this forms the cosmology of chŏnji pumomanmul tongp’o 天地父母—萬物同胞 (Heaven and Earth are parents, all things are brothers) and the ethics of kyŏngmul 敬物 (respect for things). In this sense, one can position Tonghak as the beginning of a new Korean philosophy rather than as a form of popularized Confucianism. In the early twentieth century, Tonghak’s kaebyŏk movement was succeeded by Wŏn Buddhism, and in the late twentieth century, Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s thought developed into the Hansallim Movement (Hansallim undong), a cooperative movement based on Tonghak thought, as a solution to the modern ecological problems caused by industrialization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2022.0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2022.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:韩国对东学的主流认识之一是它是一种现代儒学。例如,有人认为通学是一种大众化的儒学,而另一些人则认为通学是儒学的完美形式。但是对统学思想有不同的解释。在本研究中,我试图展示通学思想与儒家思想的不同之处,重点是通学对自我,自然和天堂的新解释。统学思想,特别是Haewŏl《中国学》Sihyŏng的思想,呈现出与儒家不同的自然主义的人与物的概念,并将伦理学的对象从人扩展到万物。在曹操Sihyŏng的哲学中,这形成了chŏnji pumomanmul tongp 'o。从这个意义上说,统学可以被定位为一种新的韩国哲学的开端,而不是大众化的儒学形式。20世纪初,统学kaebyŏk运动被Wŏn佛教所继承,20世纪后期,禅学Sihyŏng思想发展成为以统学思想为基础的解决现代工业化所带来的生态问题的合作运动“汉化运动”(汉化运动)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Philosophical Turn in Tonghak: Focusing on the Extension of Ethics of Ch’oe Sihyŏng
Abstract:One of the dominant understandings of Tonghak 東學 (Eastern Learning) in Korea is that it is a modern Confucianism. It has been suggested, for example, that Tonghak is a sort of popularized Confucianism, while others maintain Tonghak to be the perfect form of Confucianism. But there are different interpretations regarding Tonghak thought. In this study, I endeavor to show how Tonghak thought differs from Confucianism, focusing on Tonghak’s new interpretations of self, nature, and Heaven. Tonghak thought, especially according to Haewŏl 海月 Ch’oe Sihyŏng 崔時亨, presents naturalistic concepts of humans and things that differ from those of Confucianism, and they expand the object of ethics from humans to all things. In Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s philosophy, this forms the cosmology of chŏnji pumomanmul tongp’o 天地父母—萬物同胞 (Heaven and Earth are parents, all things are brothers) and the ethics of kyŏngmul 敬物 (respect for things). In this sense, one can position Tonghak as the beginning of a new Korean philosophy rather than as a form of popularized Confucianism. In the early twentieth century, Tonghak’s kaebyŏk movement was succeeded by Wŏn Buddhism, and in the late twentieth century, Ch’oe Sihyŏng’s thought developed into the Hansallim Movement (Hansallim undong), a cooperative movement based on Tonghak thought, as a solution to the modern ecological problems caused by industrialization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Religion and the Cold War: A View from Korea Buddhist Rituals of Ch'ilsŏng, the Seven Stars of the Great Dipper, in Chosŏn Korea Practicing Motherhood and Forming Matrilineal Solidarity: A Counter-cultural Response to the Patrilineal Confucian Family in the Works of Park Wansuh (1931–2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1