{"title":"预测股市波动","authors":"Michael Stamos","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2022.1.452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volatility as a measure of investment risk is widely accepted by academic researchers and industry professionals and has become ubiquitous in investment analysis. Furthermore, it is among the few financial variables that exhibit predictable time variation. Hence, there is an extensive amount of literature describing volatility models and assessing their forecasting power. This article provides a discussion of the prominent models and compares them in a unified notation framework. The empirical analysis shows that it is hard to outperform even simple trailing variance–type models. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH), generalized ARCH (GARCH), implied volatility, asymmetric, and seasonal models hardly improve forecasts despite added complexity. In this study, only momentum-based and intraday data–based models improved predictive accuracy significantly.","PeriodicalId":53670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"129 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasting Stock Market Volatility\",\"authors\":\"Michael Stamos\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2022.1.452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Volatility as a measure of investment risk is widely accepted by academic researchers and industry professionals and has become ubiquitous in investment analysis. Furthermore, it is among the few financial variables that exhibit predictable time variation. Hence, there is an extensive amount of literature describing volatility models and assessing their forecasting power. This article provides a discussion of the prominent models and compares them in a unified notation framework. The empirical analysis shows that it is hard to outperform even simple trailing variance–type models. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH), generalized ARCH (GARCH), implied volatility, asymmetric, and seasonal models hardly improve forecasts despite added complexity. In this study, only momentum-based and intraday data–based models improved predictive accuracy significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2022.1.452\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2022.1.452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Volatility as a measure of investment risk is widely accepted by academic researchers and industry professionals and has become ubiquitous in investment analysis. Furthermore, it is among the few financial variables that exhibit predictable time variation. Hence, there is an extensive amount of literature describing volatility models and assessing their forecasting power. This article provides a discussion of the prominent models and compares them in a unified notation framework. The empirical analysis shows that it is hard to outperform even simple trailing variance–type models. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH), generalized ARCH (GARCH), implied volatility, asymmetric, and seasonal models hardly improve forecasts despite added complexity. In this study, only momentum-based and intraday data–based models improved predictive accuracy significantly.
期刊介绍:
Founded by Peter Bernstein in 1974, The Journal of Portfolio Management (JPM) is the definitive source of thought-provoking analysis and practical techniques in institutional investing. It offers cutting-edge research on asset allocation, performance measurement, market trends, risk management, portfolio optimization, and more. Each quarterly issue of JPM features articles by the most renowned researchers and practitioners—including Nobel laureates—whose works define modern portfolio theory.