学生参与改善伦敦政治经济学院图书馆教授课程内容的获取:实用性和缺陷

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE New Review of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2020-07-31 DOI:10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937
Nadia Marks
{"title":"学生参与改善伦敦政治经济学院图书馆教授课程内容的获取:实用性和缺陷","authors":"Nadia Marks","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As in other academic libraries, LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science) Library does not meet student expectations for access to core readings despite increasing provision. We used user experience research to gather evidence of student experience, behaviours, and preferences for taught course content with the aim of making improvements. We found that convenience is the deciding factor for students in choosing what and how to read due the necessity of keeping up with weekly reading. They prefer PDF journal articles due to their structure and functionality and dislike e-books. This suggests that for book chapters we should offer accessible scans where possible while advocating for improved e-book functionality and licencing. Our research underlines the role of liaison librarians in encouraging appropriate use of reading lists so that they scaffold rather than spoon-feed, as students appreciate well-structured and signposted reading lists, but approach their reading instrumentally. Our next step is to engage with teaching staff.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"26 1","pages":"403 - 418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Engagement in Improving Access to Taught Course Content at LSE Library: practicalities and Pitfalls\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As in other academic libraries, LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science) Library does not meet student expectations for access to core readings despite increasing provision. We used user experience research to gather evidence of student experience, behaviours, and preferences for taught course content with the aim of making improvements. We found that convenience is the deciding factor for students in choosing what and how to read due the necessity of keeping up with weekly reading. They prefer PDF journal articles due to their structure and functionality and dislike e-books. This suggests that for book chapters we should offer accessible scans where possible while advocating for improved e-book functionality and licencing. Our research underlines the role of liaison librarians in encouraging appropriate use of reading lists so that they scaffold rather than spoon-feed, as students appreciate well-structured and signposted reading lists, but approach their reading instrumentally. Our next step is to engage with teaching staff.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"403 - 418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1803937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

与其他学术图书馆一样,LSE(伦敦政治经济学院)图书馆尽管提供了越来越多的核心读物,但仍不能满足学生对核心读物的期望。我们使用用户体验研究来收集学生体验、行为和教学课程内容偏好的证据,目的是进行改进。我们发现,由于学生需要跟上每周的阅读进度,方便是学生选择阅读内容和阅读方式的决定因素。由于PDF格式的结构和功能,他们更喜欢PDF格式的期刊文章,而不喜欢电子书。这表明,对于书籍章节,我们应该尽可能提供可访问的扫描,同时提倡改进电子书功能和许可。我们的研究强调了图书馆联络员在鼓励适当使用阅读清单方面的作用,这样他们就可以构建而不是填空,因为学生们喜欢结构良好、有路标的阅读清单,但他们的阅读方式是工具性的。我们的下一步是与教学人员接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student Engagement in Improving Access to Taught Course Content at LSE Library: practicalities and Pitfalls
Abstract As in other academic libraries, LSE (London School of Economics and Political Science) Library does not meet student expectations for access to core readings despite increasing provision. We used user experience research to gather evidence of student experience, behaviours, and preferences for taught course content with the aim of making improvements. We found that convenience is the deciding factor for students in choosing what and how to read due the necessity of keeping up with weekly reading. They prefer PDF journal articles due to their structure and functionality and dislike e-books. This suggests that for book chapters we should offer accessible scans where possible while advocating for improved e-book functionality and licencing. Our research underlines the role of liaison librarians in encouraging appropriate use of reading lists so that they scaffold rather than spoon-feed, as students appreciate well-structured and signposted reading lists, but approach their reading instrumentally. Our next step is to engage with teaching staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Workplace Empowerment and Librarianship: A Perception of Female Employees in Pakistan “Decolonising and diversifying the Library through student partnerships” Decolonising DMU: Reflections on changes, challenges and impact with an eye towards the future Diversifying, Decentring and Decolonising academic libraries: A literature review Use of e-library services by postgraduate students at Mzuzu University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1