{"title":"有发展性语言障碍史的青少年的心理健康:欺凌受害的调节作用","authors":"T. Kilpatrick, S. Leitão, M. Boyes","doi":"10.1177/2396941519893313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Children and adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder are at elevated risk of experiencing internalising and externalising symptoms. The existing literature suggests a link between developmental language disorder, bullying victimisation and low self-esteem, both of which are negatively associated with child and adolescent mental health more generally. Aim We examined the relationship between having a history of developmental language disorder and internalising and externalising symptoms in adolescence. We also tested whether bullying victimisation and self-esteem were associated with mental health outcomes, and whether they moderated the association between a history of developmental language disorder and psychological symptoms. Methods and procedures: Adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder (n = 20, 10–16 years, 10% female, 90% male) were compared to a group of typically developing peers (n = 22, 10–16 years, 36.4% female, 63.6% male). Receptive and expressive language, internalising and externalising symptoms, bullying victimisation and self-esteem were assessed with well-validated measures. Outcomes and results: Contrary to our predictions, a history of developmental language disorder was not directly associated with internalising or externalising symptoms. However, in terms of internalising symptoms, there was a significant interaction between a history of developmental language disorder and bullying victimisation (β = 1.01, p = .02). Specifically, there was a significant association between a history of developmental language disorder and internalising symptoms at high levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = 2.52, p = .02] but not at low levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = –.67, p = .51). Conclusions and implications: Bullying victimisation appears to increase the risk of internalising symptoms in adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder. Future research should examine whether anti-bullying interventions can help prevent the development of internalising problems for children with developmental language disorder. These findings may aid clinicians in developing their understanding of developmental language disorder and reinforces the importance of holistic client management in speech language therapy.","PeriodicalId":36716,"journal":{"name":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941519893313","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health in adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder: The moderating effect of bullying victimisation\",\"authors\":\"T. Kilpatrick, S. Leitão, M. Boyes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2396941519893313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Children and adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder are at elevated risk of experiencing internalising and externalising symptoms. The existing literature suggests a link between developmental language disorder, bullying victimisation and low self-esteem, both of which are negatively associated with child and adolescent mental health more generally. Aim We examined the relationship between having a history of developmental language disorder and internalising and externalising symptoms in adolescence. We also tested whether bullying victimisation and self-esteem were associated with mental health outcomes, and whether they moderated the association between a history of developmental language disorder and psychological symptoms. Methods and procedures: Adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder (n = 20, 10–16 years, 10% female, 90% male) were compared to a group of typically developing peers (n = 22, 10–16 years, 36.4% female, 63.6% male). Receptive and expressive language, internalising and externalising symptoms, bullying victimisation and self-esteem were assessed with well-validated measures. Outcomes and results: Contrary to our predictions, a history of developmental language disorder was not directly associated with internalising or externalising symptoms. However, in terms of internalising symptoms, there was a significant interaction between a history of developmental language disorder and bullying victimisation (β = 1.01, p = .02). Specifically, there was a significant association between a history of developmental language disorder and internalising symptoms at high levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = 2.52, p = .02] but not at low levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = –.67, p = .51). Conclusions and implications: Bullying victimisation appears to increase the risk of internalising symptoms in adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder. Future research should examine whether anti-bullying interventions can help prevent the development of internalising problems for children with developmental language disorder. These findings may aid clinicians in developing their understanding of developmental language disorder and reinforces the importance of holistic client management in speech language therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2396941519893313\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941519893313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism and Developmental Language Impairments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941519893313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
背景有发育性语言障碍史的儿童和青少年经历内化和外化症状的风险较高。现有的文献表明,发育性语言障碍、欺凌受害者和低自尊之间存在联系,这两者都与儿童和青少年的心理健康负相关。目的探讨有发展性语言障碍史与青春期内化和外化症状之间的关系。我们还测试了欺凌受害者和自尊是否与心理健康结果有关,以及它们是否缓和了发展性语言障碍史和心理症状之间的联系。方法和步骤:将有发展性语言障碍史的青少年(n = 20, 10-16岁,女性占10%,男性占90%)与发育正常的同龄人(n = 22, 10-16岁,女性占36.4%,男性占63.6%)进行比较。接受性和表达性语言、内化和外化症状、欺凌受害者和自尊被评估为有效的措施。结果和结果:与我们的预测相反,发展性语言障碍的历史与内化或外化症状没有直接关系。然而,就内化症状而言,发育性语言障碍史与欺凌受害者之间存在显著的相互作用(β = 1.01, p = 0.02)。具体而言,发展性语言障碍史与高水平欺凌受害者的内化症状之间存在显著关联[t(41) = 2.52, p =。[02]但不包括低水平的欺凌受害[t(41) = -]。67, p = .51)。结论和启示:欺凌受害者似乎增加了有发展性语言障碍史的青少年内化症状的风险。未来的研究应该检查反欺凌干预是否有助于防止发展性语言障碍儿童的内化问题的发展。这些发现可能有助于临床医生发展他们对发展性语言障碍的理解,并加强在言语语言治疗中整体客户管理的重要性。
Mental health in adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder: The moderating effect of bullying victimisation
Background Children and adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder are at elevated risk of experiencing internalising and externalising symptoms. The existing literature suggests a link between developmental language disorder, bullying victimisation and low self-esteem, both of which are negatively associated with child and adolescent mental health more generally. Aim We examined the relationship between having a history of developmental language disorder and internalising and externalising symptoms in adolescence. We also tested whether bullying victimisation and self-esteem were associated with mental health outcomes, and whether they moderated the association between a history of developmental language disorder and psychological symptoms. Methods and procedures: Adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder (n = 20, 10–16 years, 10% female, 90% male) were compared to a group of typically developing peers (n = 22, 10–16 years, 36.4% female, 63.6% male). Receptive and expressive language, internalising and externalising symptoms, bullying victimisation and self-esteem were assessed with well-validated measures. Outcomes and results: Contrary to our predictions, a history of developmental language disorder was not directly associated with internalising or externalising symptoms. However, in terms of internalising symptoms, there was a significant interaction between a history of developmental language disorder and bullying victimisation (β = 1.01, p = .02). Specifically, there was a significant association between a history of developmental language disorder and internalising symptoms at high levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = 2.52, p = .02] but not at low levels of bullying victimisation [t(41) = –.67, p = .51). Conclusions and implications: Bullying victimisation appears to increase the risk of internalising symptoms in adolescents with a history of developmental language disorder. Future research should examine whether anti-bullying interventions can help prevent the development of internalising problems for children with developmental language disorder. These findings may aid clinicians in developing their understanding of developmental language disorder and reinforces the importance of holistic client management in speech language therapy.