追踪国家对COVID-19的问责:在爱尔兰应对大流行的过程中代表关怀

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Policy and Society Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s1474746422000665
Felicity Daly, Claire Edwards
{"title":"追踪国家对COVID-19的问责:在爱尔兰应对大流行的过程中代表关怀","authors":"Felicity Daly, Claire Edwards","doi":"10.1017/s1474746422000665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 triggers urgent questions about the social, political and ethical implications of care markets, practices and relations. This article presents analysis of the Houses of the Oireachtas Special Committee on Covid-19 Response exposing current discourses about care in Ireland. Utilising the Trace analysis method (Sevenhuijsen, 2004), grounded in feminist care ethics, reveals a state accountability exercise grappling with the failures of the care market and the inhumanity of congregated settings. Care discourses were constrained by a focus on the formal health system, normalisation of binary care giver and care receiver categorisations and a lack of recognition of gendered inequalities of care in homes and workplaces. Public discourse and feminist analysis revealed unreasonable labour conditions for women working in health and social care and a silencing of the voices of those with care needs. The article contributes to a reconceptualisation of care in post-pandemic futures and urges societal co-responsibility for ‘universal care’.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing State Accountability for COVID-19: Representing Care within Ireland’s Response to the Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Daly, Claire Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1474746422000665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 triggers urgent questions about the social, political and ethical implications of care markets, practices and relations. This article presents analysis of the Houses of the Oireachtas Special Committee on Covid-19 Response exposing current discourses about care in Ireland. Utilising the Trace analysis method (Sevenhuijsen, 2004), grounded in feminist care ethics, reveals a state accountability exercise grappling with the failures of the care market and the inhumanity of congregated settings. Care discourses were constrained by a focus on the formal health system, normalisation of binary care giver and care receiver categorisations and a lack of recognition of gendered inequalities of care in homes and workplaces. Public discourse and feminist analysis revealed unreasonable labour conditions for women working in health and social care and a silencing of the voices of those with care needs. The article contributes to a reconceptualisation of care in post-pandemic futures and urges societal co-responsibility for ‘universal care’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746422000665\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746422000665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

COVID-19引发了关于护理市场、做法和关系的社会、政治和伦理影响的紧迫问题。本文介绍了对爱尔兰应对Covid-19特别委员会的房屋的分析,揭示了目前关于爱尔兰护理的话语。利用基于女权主义护理伦理的痕量分析方法(Sevenhuijsen, 2004),揭示了一种国家问责的做法,该做法正在努力应对护理市场的失败和聚集环境的不人道。由于对正式卫生系统的关注、二元护理者和受护理者分类的正常化以及对家庭和工作场所护理的性别不平等缺乏认识,护理话语受到了限制。公共话语和女权主义分析表明,从事保健和社会护理工作的妇女的劳动条件不合理,需要护理者的声音被压制。这篇文章有助于重新定义大流行后未来的护理概念,并敦促社会共同承担“全民保健”的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tracing State Accountability for COVID-19: Representing Care within Ireland’s Response to the Pandemic
COVID-19 triggers urgent questions about the social, political and ethical implications of care markets, practices and relations. This article presents analysis of the Houses of the Oireachtas Special Committee on Covid-19 Response exposing current discourses about care in Ireland. Utilising the Trace analysis method (Sevenhuijsen, 2004), grounded in feminist care ethics, reveals a state accountability exercise grappling with the failures of the care market and the inhumanity of congregated settings. Care discourses were constrained by a focus on the formal health system, normalisation of binary care giver and care receiver categorisations and a lack of recognition of gendered inequalities of care in homes and workplaces. Public discourse and feminist analysis revealed unreasonable labour conditions for women working in health and social care and a silencing of the voices of those with care needs. The article contributes to a reconceptualisation of care in post-pandemic futures and urges societal co-responsibility for ‘universal care’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
The ‘Perfect Storm’: Food Banks and Food Insecurity During the Covid-19 Pandemic Five Factors for Effective Policy to Improve Attitudes towards People with Disability Homelessness Transitions, Risks, and Prevention Across the Life Course Silent Elements of Policy Change: Inflation and Uprating Mechanisms in the Low Countries Exclusionary Mechanisms of Social Policy Redistribution in Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1