体外及内外经皮经肝胆道引流治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效观察

Yi-lei Deng, Menghao Zhou, Longshuan Zhao
{"title":"体外及内外经皮经肝胆道引流治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效观察","authors":"Yi-lei Deng, Menghao Zhou, Longshuan Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the efficacy of two different percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures for malignant obstructive jaundice. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 132 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who underwent PTBD were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the tip of the catheter was placed in the intestine, 132 patients were divided into the external drainage group and the internal-external drainage group. The effect on decrease in jaundice (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin levels), postoperative complications, and hospitalization costs of the two drainage methods were compared. \n \n \nResults \nOf the 132 patients who were included in this study, there were 91 males and 41 females, aged 18 to 85 years. The external drainage group included 81 patients, and the internal and external drainage group included 51 patients. The total bilirubin [(190.2±41.8)μmol/L vs. (294.9±38.3) μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(155.4±30.9)μmol/L vs. (242.1±39.6) μmol/L] levels in the external drainage group and the total bilirubin [(179.3±37.1)μmol/L vs. (288.1±35.4)μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(147.7±32.5)μmol/L vs. (233.7±36.1)μmol/L] levels in the internal-external drainage group were significantly decreased after surgery (all P<0.05). The incidences of reoperation, re-intubation or bilateral catheterization [15.6%(8/51) vs. 3.7%(3/81)] and biliary tract infection [50.9%(26/51) vs. 27.1%(22/81)] in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group (all P<0.05). The mortality rate due to biliary tract infection in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that of the external drainage group [7.8%(4/51) vs. 0, P<0.05]. Intestinal-derived bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the main bacteria in the biliary tract infections of the two groups. The hospitalization cost of patients in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group [(34 928.0±3 693.0) yuan vs. (29 360.0±3 219.0) yuan, P<0.05]. \n \n \nConclusion \nBoth PTBD external drainage and internal and external drainage could alleviate the symptoms of jaundice quickly and effectively. \n \n \nKey words: \nJaundice, obstructive; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; Biliary tract infection","PeriodicalId":10021,"journal":{"name":"中华肝胆外科杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"203-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice\",\"authors\":\"Yi-lei Deng, Menghao Zhou, Longshuan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the efficacy of two different percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures for malignant obstructive jaundice. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe clinical data of 132 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who underwent PTBD were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the tip of the catheter was placed in the intestine, 132 patients were divided into the external drainage group and the internal-external drainage group. The effect on decrease in jaundice (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin levels), postoperative complications, and hospitalization costs of the two drainage methods were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nOf the 132 patients who were included in this study, there were 91 males and 41 females, aged 18 to 85 years. The external drainage group included 81 patients, and the internal and external drainage group included 51 patients. The total bilirubin [(190.2±41.8)μmol/L vs. (294.9±38.3) μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(155.4±30.9)μmol/L vs. (242.1±39.6) μmol/L] levels in the external drainage group and the total bilirubin [(179.3±37.1)μmol/L vs. (288.1±35.4)μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(147.7±32.5)μmol/L vs. (233.7±36.1)μmol/L] levels in the internal-external drainage group were significantly decreased after surgery (all P<0.05). The incidences of reoperation, re-intubation or bilateral catheterization [15.6%(8/51) vs. 3.7%(3/81)] and biliary tract infection [50.9%(26/51) vs. 27.1%(22/81)] in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group (all P<0.05). The mortality rate due to biliary tract infection in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that of the external drainage group [7.8%(4/51) vs. 0, P<0.05]. Intestinal-derived bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the main bacteria in the biliary tract infections of the two groups. The hospitalization cost of patients in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group [(34 928.0±3 693.0) yuan vs. (29 360.0±3 219.0) yuan, P<0.05]. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nBoth PTBD external drainage and internal and external drainage could alleviate the symptoms of jaundice quickly and effectively. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nJaundice, obstructive; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; Biliary tract infection\",\"PeriodicalId\":10021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"203-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肝胆外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝胆外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-8118.2020.03.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨两种不同的经皮经肝胆道引流术治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效。方法回顾性分析132例恶性梗阻性黄疸行PTBD的临床资料。根据导管尖端是否放置在肠内,将132例患者分为外引流组和内外引流组。比较两种引流方式对降低黄疸(总胆红素、直接胆红素水平)、术后并发症及住院费用的影响。结果本研究纳入的132例患者中,男性91例,女性41例,年龄18 ~ 85岁。外引流组81例,内外引流组51例。体外引流组总胆红素[(190.2±41.8)μmol/L比(294.9±38.3)μmol/L]、直接胆红素[(155.4±30.9)μmol/L比(242.1±39.6)μmol/L]水平及内外引流组总胆红素[(179.3±37.1)μmol/L比(288.1±35.4)μmol/L]、直接胆红素[(147.7±32.5)μmol/L比(233.7±36.1)μmol/L]水平术后均显著降低(P<0.05)。内外引流组再手术、再插管或双侧置管发生率[15.6%(8/51)比3.7%(3/81)]和胆道感染发生率[50.9%(26/51)比27.1%(22/81)]显著高于外引流组(P<0.05)。外置引流组胆道感染死亡率显著高于外置引流组[7.8%(4/51)vs. 0, P<0.05]。两组胆道感染以大肠杆菌、屎肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌等肠道源性细菌为主。内外引流组患者住院费用显著高于外引流组[(34 928.0±3 693.0)元vs(29 360.0±3 219.0)元,P<0.05]。结论PTBD外置引流和内外置引流均能快速有效地缓解黄疸症状。关键词:黄疸;梗阻性;经皮经肝胆道引流;胆道感染
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice
Objective To investigate the efficacy of two different percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures for malignant obstructive jaundice. Methods The clinical data of 132 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who underwent PTBD were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the tip of the catheter was placed in the intestine, 132 patients were divided into the external drainage group and the internal-external drainage group. The effect on decrease in jaundice (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin levels), postoperative complications, and hospitalization costs of the two drainage methods were compared. Results Of the 132 patients who were included in this study, there were 91 males and 41 females, aged 18 to 85 years. The external drainage group included 81 patients, and the internal and external drainage group included 51 patients. The total bilirubin [(190.2±41.8)μmol/L vs. (294.9±38.3) μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(155.4±30.9)μmol/L vs. (242.1±39.6) μmol/L] levels in the external drainage group and the total bilirubin [(179.3±37.1)μmol/L vs. (288.1±35.4)μmol/L] and direct bilirubin [(147.7±32.5)μmol/L vs. (233.7±36.1)μmol/L] levels in the internal-external drainage group were significantly decreased after surgery (all P<0.05). The incidences of reoperation, re-intubation or bilateral catheterization [15.6%(8/51) vs. 3.7%(3/81)] and biliary tract infection [50.9%(26/51) vs. 27.1%(22/81)] in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group (all P<0.05). The mortality rate due to biliary tract infection in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that of the external drainage group [7.8%(4/51) vs. 0, P<0.05]. Intestinal-derived bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the main bacteria in the biliary tract infections of the two groups. The hospitalization cost of patients in the internal-external drainage group was significantly higher than that in the external drainage group [(34 928.0±3 693.0) yuan vs. (29 360.0±3 219.0) yuan, P<0.05]. Conclusion Both PTBD external drainage and internal and external drainage could alleviate the symptoms of jaundice quickly and effectively. Key words: Jaundice, obstructive; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; Biliary tract infection
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肝胆外科杂志
中华肝胆外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7101
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association and supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology, founded in 1995. The journal has the following columns: review, hot spotlight, academic thinking, thesis, experimental research, short thesis, case report, synthesis, etc. The journal has been recognized by Beida Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences). Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery has been included in famous databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of China Science Citation Database (with Extended Version) and so on, and it is one of the national key academic journals under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic efficacy of external and internal-external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice Combined postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis Retrograde approach to the retroperitoneal Castleman disease: a case report and literature review Application of laparoscopy in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Hepatic biloma after minimally invasive interventional therapies: treatment and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1