Larreta主义对乌拉圭国内政治的影响:目标中的庇隆主义阿根廷(1945-1946)

Carolina Cerrano
{"title":"Larreta主义对乌拉圭国内政治的影响:目标中的庇隆主义阿根廷(1945-1946)","authors":"Carolina Cerrano","doi":"10.22187/RFD2019N47A12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the repercussion of the doctrine of Eduardo Rodriguez Larreta in Uruguayan internal politics. At the end of November 1945, the Uruguayan chancellor sent a document to the Americas’ Foreign Ministries proposing to consider and discuss the possibility of a \"multilateral collective action\" before regimes of force that violated the rights of man and of the citizen, even though they were not necessarily still a threat to peace. The thesis put into discussion the consecrated principle of non-intervention. The Uruguayan note was rejected by most of the countries of the continent and fought by several local political media. At the beginning of 1946, the administration of Juan Jose de Amezaga modified the central point of the discord - the \"multilateral intervention\". However, contemporaries opposed to the proposal read it thought in Argentine key, that is to say against the dictatorship of Edelmiro Farrell - Juan Domingo Peron. Finally, breaking the forecasts Peron, continuator of that dictatorship, was elected president in February 1946 and the consequences of the victory were felt in Uruguay.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El impacto de la doctrina Larreta en la política interna uruguaya: la Argentina peronista en la mira (1945-1946)\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Cerrano\",\"doi\":\"10.22187/RFD2019N47A12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies the repercussion of the doctrine of Eduardo Rodriguez Larreta in Uruguayan internal politics. At the end of November 1945, the Uruguayan chancellor sent a document to the Americas’ Foreign Ministries proposing to consider and discuss the possibility of a \\\"multilateral collective action\\\" before regimes of force that violated the rights of man and of the citizen, even though they were not necessarily still a threat to peace. The thesis put into discussion the consecrated principle of non-intervention. The Uruguayan note was rejected by most of the countries of the continent and fought by several local political media. At the beginning of 1946, the administration of Juan Jose de Amezaga modified the central point of the discord - the \\\"multilateral intervention\\\". However, contemporaries opposed to the proposal read it thought in Argentine key, that is to say against the dictatorship of Edelmiro Farrell - Juan Domingo Peron. Finally, breaking the forecasts Peron, continuator of that dictatorship, was elected president in February 1946 and the consequences of the victory were felt in Uruguay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究爱德华多·罗德里格斯·拉雷塔学说在乌拉圭内部政治中的影响。1945年11月底,乌拉圭总理向美洲外交部发送了一份文件,建议考虑和讨论在侵犯人和公民权利的武力政权面前采取“多边集体行动”的可能性,尽管这些政权不一定仍然是对和平的威胁。本文对神圣的不干涉原则进行了探讨。乌拉圭的照会遭到了非洲大陆大多数国家的拒绝,并遭到了一些当地政治媒体的反对。1946年初,胡安·何塞·德·阿梅扎加政府修改了分歧的中心点——“多边干预”。然而,同时代的反对者却把它念成了阿根廷的钥匙,也就是说反对埃德尔米罗·法雷尔-胡安·多明戈·庇隆的独裁统治。最后,打破了人们的预测,独裁统治的延续者庇隆于1946年2月当选总统,乌拉圭也感受到了胜利的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El impacto de la doctrina Larreta en la política interna uruguaya: la Argentina peronista en la mira (1945-1946)
This article studies the repercussion of the doctrine of Eduardo Rodriguez Larreta in Uruguayan internal politics. At the end of November 1945, the Uruguayan chancellor sent a document to the Americas’ Foreign Ministries proposing to consider and discuss the possibility of a "multilateral collective action" before regimes of force that violated the rights of man and of the citizen, even though they were not necessarily still a threat to peace. The thesis put into discussion the consecrated principle of non-intervention. The Uruguayan note was rejected by most of the countries of the continent and fought by several local political media. At the beginning of 1946, the administration of Juan Jose de Amezaga modified the central point of the discord - the "multilateral intervention". However, contemporaries opposed to the proposal read it thought in Argentine key, that is to say against the dictatorship of Edelmiro Farrell - Juan Domingo Peron. Finally, breaking the forecasts Peron, continuator of that dictatorship, was elected president in February 1946 and the consequences of the victory were felt in Uruguay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1