书评:《想象英国军队中的核战争,1945-1989》,作者西蒙·j·穆迪

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY War in History Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI:10.1177/09683445221102897d
B. Linn
{"title":"书评:《想象英国军队中的核战争,1945-1989》,作者西蒙·j·穆迪","authors":"B. Linn","doi":"10.1177/09683445221102897d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"fortresses against the Soviet tide. The concept of the ‘fortress city’ had originated on the Eastern front. Though ultimately unsuccessful there, the Nazi leadership and Wehrmacht commands hoped it could now prevail thanks to the supposed practical benefits of fighting on home soil. These included the ability to harness a ‘battle community’ encompassing civilians also, whether by deploying them in home guard units or via other measures. Willems argues that although the fortress strategy was unrealistic, it was also rational; he thus challenges assertions that theWehrmacht was actively facilitating a conscious choreography of self-destruction during the war’s final months. Willems’ study employs copious, varied empirical evidence encompassing official and personal-level material drawn from the German federal military archive in Germany, from Kaliningrad, and from sources from the city that found their way into the west during the immediate post-war period before being housed in Duisburg. It is original, analytically rigorous, and engagingly written. It significantly deepens and refines understanding of the Third Reich’s collapse and of the Wehrmacht’s role within it, and deserves attention from specialists and students alike.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"29 1","pages":"755 - 756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Imagining Nuclear War in the British Army, 1945-1989 by Simon J. Moody\",\"authors\":\"B. Linn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09683445221102897d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"fortresses against the Soviet tide. The concept of the ‘fortress city’ had originated on the Eastern front. Though ultimately unsuccessful there, the Nazi leadership and Wehrmacht commands hoped it could now prevail thanks to the supposed practical benefits of fighting on home soil. These included the ability to harness a ‘battle community’ encompassing civilians also, whether by deploying them in home guard units or via other measures. Willems argues that although the fortress strategy was unrealistic, it was also rational; he thus challenges assertions that theWehrmacht was actively facilitating a conscious choreography of self-destruction during the war’s final months. Willems’ study employs copious, varied empirical evidence encompassing official and personal-level material drawn from the German federal military archive in Germany, from Kaliningrad, and from sources from the city that found their way into the west during the immediate post-war period before being housed in Duisburg. It is original, analytically rigorous, and engagingly written. It significantly deepens and refines understanding of the Third Reich’s collapse and of the Wehrmacht’s role within it, and deserves attention from specialists and students alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War in History\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"755 - 756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War in History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221102897d\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221102897d","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抵御苏联浪潮的堡垒“堡垒城市”的概念起源于东线。尽管最终在那里失败了,但纳粹领导层和国防军司令部希望,由于在本土作战的实际好处,它现在能取得胜利。这些包括利用包括平民在内的“战斗社区”的能力,无论是通过将他们部署在家庭警卫单位还是通过其他措施。威廉姆斯认为,虽然堡垒战略是不现实的,但它也是理性的;因此,他对德国国防军在战争最后几个月积极促成有意识的自我毁灭的说法提出了质疑。威廉姆斯的研究采用了丰富多样的经验证据,包括官方和个人层面的材料,这些材料来自德国联邦军事档案馆,加里宁格勒,以及在战后被安置在杜伊斯堡之前进入西方的城市的资料。它是原创的,分析严谨,写得很吸引人。它极大地加深和完善了对第三帝国崩溃和国防军在其中所扮演角色的理解,值得专家和学生们的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Imagining Nuclear War in the British Army, 1945-1989 by Simon J. Moody
fortresses against the Soviet tide. The concept of the ‘fortress city’ had originated on the Eastern front. Though ultimately unsuccessful there, the Nazi leadership and Wehrmacht commands hoped it could now prevail thanks to the supposed practical benefits of fighting on home soil. These included the ability to harness a ‘battle community’ encompassing civilians also, whether by deploying them in home guard units or via other measures. Willems argues that although the fortress strategy was unrealistic, it was also rational; he thus challenges assertions that theWehrmacht was actively facilitating a conscious choreography of self-destruction during the war’s final months. Willems’ study employs copious, varied empirical evidence encompassing official and personal-level material drawn from the German federal military archive in Germany, from Kaliningrad, and from sources from the city that found their way into the west during the immediate post-war period before being housed in Duisburg. It is original, analytically rigorous, and engagingly written. It significantly deepens and refines understanding of the Third Reich’s collapse and of the Wehrmacht’s role within it, and deserves attention from specialists and students alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
War in History
War in History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Building the Army’s Backbone: Canadian Non-Commissioned Officers in the Second World War by Andrew L. Brown Book Review: Out of Line, Out of Place. A Global and Local History of World War I Internments by Rotem Kowner and Iris Rachamimov Book Review: A Question of Standing: The History of the CIA by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones Book Review: Secession and Separatist Conflicts in Postcolonial Africa by Charles G. Thomas and Toyin Falola Book Review: Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace: The Rise, Demise, and Revival of Arms Control by Michael Krepon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1