重度或重度智障儿童家长依恋强度与需求访谈:可接受性与可行性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2021-06-05 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2021.1925528
Sien Vandesande, G. Bosmans, P. Sterkenburg, C. Schuengel, B. Maes
{"title":"重度或重度智障儿童家长依恋强度与需求访谈:可接受性与可行性研究","authors":"Sien Vandesande, G. Bosmans, P. Sterkenburg, C. Schuengel, B. Maes","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2021.1925528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The feasibility and acceptability was explored of the newly-constructed Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview for parents of children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Method A partially mixed methods approach (with focus on the quantitative data) was used to clarify parents’ and professionals’ viewpoints regarding the acceptability of the interview through websurvey-ratings. Results Parents generally felt appreciated during or after the interview, were motivated to work on the proposed goals and felt the interview covered their actual needs, but were, however, more neutral on the aspects of reflection and learning. Professionals indicated that the interview gathered sufficient information on most elements of interest at the start of an intervention trajectory, but generally missed information on the origins of parents’ questions and the families’ expectations towards taking part in an intervention. Conclusions The current study showed preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of the Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview, as part of a broader intake procedure, to inform attachment-focused interventions for parents of children with disabilities by identifying their strengths and needs.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":"47 1","pages":"118 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview for parents of children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: An acceptability and feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Sien Vandesande, G. Bosmans, P. Sterkenburg, C. Schuengel, B. Maes\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2021.1925528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background The feasibility and acceptability was explored of the newly-constructed Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview for parents of children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Method A partially mixed methods approach (with focus on the quantitative data) was used to clarify parents’ and professionals’ viewpoints regarding the acceptability of the interview through websurvey-ratings. Results Parents generally felt appreciated during or after the interview, were motivated to work on the proposed goals and felt the interview covered their actual needs, but were, however, more neutral on the aspects of reflection and learning. Professionals indicated that the interview gathered sufficient information on most elements of interest at the start of an intervention trajectory, but generally missed information on the origins of parents’ questions and the families’ expectations towards taking part in an intervention. Conclusions The current study showed preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of the Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview, as part of a broader intake procedure, to inform attachment-focused interventions for parents of children with disabilities by identifying their strengths and needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1925528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1925528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要背景探讨新构建的重度或重度智障儿童家长依恋优势与需求访谈的可行性和可接受性。方法采用部分混合方法(以定量数据为重点),通过网络调查-评分来澄清家长和专业人士对访谈可接受性的看法。结果家长在访谈过程中或访谈结束后普遍感到受到赞赏,有动力去实现所提出的目标,并认为访谈涵盖了他们的实际需求,但在反思和学习方面则较为中立。专业人士指出,在干预轨迹开始时,访谈收集了关于大多数感兴趣元素的足够信息,但通常遗漏了关于父母问题的来源和家庭对参与干预的期望的信息。目前的研究初步支持依恋优势和需求访谈的可行性和可接受性,作为更广泛的接纳程序的一部分,通过确定残疾儿童的优势和需求,为父母提供以依恋为中心的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview for parents of children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: An acceptability and feasibility study
ABSTRACT Background The feasibility and acceptability was explored of the newly-constructed Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview for parents of children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Method A partially mixed methods approach (with focus on the quantitative data) was used to clarify parents’ and professionals’ viewpoints regarding the acceptability of the interview through websurvey-ratings. Results Parents generally felt appreciated during or after the interview, were motivated to work on the proposed goals and felt the interview covered their actual needs, but were, however, more neutral on the aspects of reflection and learning. Professionals indicated that the interview gathered sufficient information on most elements of interest at the start of an intervention trajectory, but generally missed information on the origins of parents’ questions and the families’ expectations towards taking part in an intervention. Conclusions The current study showed preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of the Attachment Strengths and Needs Interview, as part of a broader intake procedure, to inform attachment-focused interventions for parents of children with disabilities by identifying their strengths and needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Family members use superficial justice information to evaluate performance of sheltered workshops: A warning about “cognitive shortcuts” The uniquely relational role of nurses during the closure of large residential institutions for people with intellectual disability in Australia: A qualitative study Relatives’ experiences of quality of healthcare services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in Sweden Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm Reducing the risks of maltreatment of older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Development of a research-based intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1