在少数民族人口中实施、吸收和使用数字卫生干预措施的框架:以心脏代谢疾病为案例研究的范围审查。(预印本)

Q2 Medicine JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.2196/preprints.37360
M. Ramasawmy, L. Poole, Zareen Thorlu-Bangura, Aneesha Chauhan, Mayur Murali, Parbir Jagpal, Mehar Bijral, J. Prashar, Abigail G-Medhin, E. Murray, F. Stevenson, A. Blandford, H. Potts, K. Khunti, W. Hanif, Paramjit Gill, Madiha Sajid, K. Patel, H. Sood, N. Bhala, Ayath Ullah, Shivali Modha, M. Mistry, Vinod Patel, Sarah N Ali, A. Ala, A. Banerjee
{"title":"在少数民族人口中实施、吸收和使用数字卫生干预措施的框架:以心脏代谢疾病为案例研究的范围审查。(预印本)","authors":"M. Ramasawmy, L. Poole, Zareen Thorlu-Bangura, Aneesha Chauhan, Mayur Murali, Parbir Jagpal, Mehar Bijral, J. Prashar, Abigail G-Medhin, E. Murray, F. Stevenson, A. Blandford, H. Potts, K. Khunti, W. Hanif, Paramjit Gill, Madiha Sajid, K. Patel, H. Sood, N. Bhala, Ayath Ullah, Shivali Modha, M. Mistry, Vinod Patel, Sarah N Ali, A. Ala, A. Banerjee","doi":"10.2196/preprints.37360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n BACKGROUND\n Digital health interventions (DHIs) have become increasingly common across healthcare, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health inequalities, particularly by ethnicity, are recognised across diseases, but may be excluded in frameworks addressing implementation of DHIs.\n \n \n OBJECTIVE\n Using cardiometabolic disease as an exemplar, this scoping review aims to assess how health inequalities are addressed in frameworks relevant to the implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, health and ethnic inequalities, and interventions for cardiometabolic disease.\n \n \n METHODS\n SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE and grey literature was searched to identify frameworks relevant to: implementation, uptake and use of DHIs; ethnically or culturally diverse populations and health inequalities; and interventions for cardiometabolic disease. We assessed the extent to which these include health inequalities, specifically regarding ethnicity; and explored how these were addressed, drawing out recommendations for good practice.\n \n \n RESULTS\n Of 58 relevant frameworks, 22 (38%) included reference to health inequalities. Inequalities were conceptualised to operate across four levels: society, system, intervention and individual. Only five frameworks considered all levels. Three frameworks considered how DHIs might interact with or exacerbate existing health inequalities; and three considered the process of implementation, uptake and use of health technologies and suggested opportunities to improve equity in digital health. Where ethnicity was considered, this was often within the broader social determinants of health. Only three frameworks explicitly addressed ethnicity: one focused on culturally tailoring DHIs; and two were applied to management of cardiometabolic disease.\n \n \n CONCLUSIONS\n Existing frameworks evaluate implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, but to consider factors related to ethnicity necessitates looking across frameworks. We have developed a guide to support future research to assess real world usability and applicability of these frameworks, to mitigate against digital health inequalities and to inform digital health policies.\n","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frameworks for implementation, uptake and use of digital health interventions in ethnic minority populations: a scoping review using cardiometabolic disease as a case study. (Preprint)\",\"authors\":\"M. Ramasawmy, L. Poole, Zareen Thorlu-Bangura, Aneesha Chauhan, Mayur Murali, Parbir Jagpal, Mehar Bijral, J. Prashar, Abigail G-Medhin, E. Murray, F. Stevenson, A. Blandford, H. Potts, K. Khunti, W. Hanif, Paramjit Gill, Madiha Sajid, K. Patel, H. Sood, N. Bhala, Ayath Ullah, Shivali Modha, M. Mistry, Vinod Patel, Sarah N Ali, A. Ala, A. Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/preprints.37360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n BACKGROUND\\n Digital health interventions (DHIs) have become increasingly common across healthcare, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health inequalities, particularly by ethnicity, are recognised across diseases, but may be excluded in frameworks addressing implementation of DHIs.\\n \\n \\n OBJECTIVE\\n Using cardiometabolic disease as an exemplar, this scoping review aims to assess how health inequalities are addressed in frameworks relevant to the implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, health and ethnic inequalities, and interventions for cardiometabolic disease.\\n \\n \\n METHODS\\n SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE and grey literature was searched to identify frameworks relevant to: implementation, uptake and use of DHIs; ethnically or culturally diverse populations and health inequalities; and interventions for cardiometabolic disease. We assessed the extent to which these include health inequalities, specifically regarding ethnicity; and explored how these were addressed, drawing out recommendations for good practice.\\n \\n \\n RESULTS\\n Of 58 relevant frameworks, 22 (38%) included reference to health inequalities. Inequalities were conceptualised to operate across four levels: society, system, intervention and individual. Only five frameworks considered all levels. Three frameworks considered how DHIs might interact with or exacerbate existing health inequalities; and three considered the process of implementation, uptake and use of health technologies and suggested opportunities to improve equity in digital health. Where ethnicity was considered, this was often within the broader social determinants of health. Only three frameworks explicitly addressed ethnicity: one focused on culturally tailoring DHIs; and two were applied to management of cardiometabolic disease.\\n \\n \\n CONCLUSIONS\\n Existing frameworks evaluate implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, but to consider factors related to ethnicity necessitates looking across frameworks. We have developed a guide to support future research to assess real world usability and applicability of these frameworks, to mitigate against digital health inequalities and to inform digital health policies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":14706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cardio\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cardio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.37360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.37360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间,数字健康干预(DHI)在医疗保健中越来越普遍。健康不平等,特别是种族不平等,在各种疾病中都得到了承认,但在实施DHI的框架中可能会被排除在外。目的以心脏代谢疾病为例,本范围审查旨在评估如何在与DHI的实施、吸收和使用、健康和种族不平等以及心脏代谢疾病干预相关的框架中解决健康不平等问题。方法检索SCOPUS、PubMed、EMBASE和灰色文献,以确定与DHIs的实施、吸收和使用相关的框架;种族或文化多样的人口和健康不平等;以及对心脏代谢疾病的干预。我们评估了其中包括健康不平等的程度,特别是在种族方面;并探讨了如何解决这些问题,提出了良好做法的建议。结果在58个相关框架中,22个(38%)提到了健康不平等。不平等被概念化为跨越四个层面:社会、制度、干预和个人。只有五个框架考虑了所有级别。三个框架考虑了DHI如何与现有的健康不平等相互作用或加剧这些不平等;三个审议了卫生技术的实施、吸收和使用过程,并提出了改善数字卫生公平性的机会。在考虑种族的情况下,这通常属于健康的更广泛的社会决定因素。只有三个框架明确涉及种族问题:一个侧重于从文化上调整DHI;两种用于心脏代谢性疾病的治疗。结论现有的框架评估DHI的实施、接受和使用,但要考虑与种族相关的因素,就需要跨框架进行研究。我们制定了一份指南,以支持未来的研究,评估这些框架在现实世界中的可用性和适用性,缓解数字健康不平等,并为数字健康政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frameworks for implementation, uptake and use of digital health interventions in ethnic minority populations: a scoping review using cardiometabolic disease as a case study. (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) have become increasingly common across healthcare, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health inequalities, particularly by ethnicity, are recognised across diseases, but may be excluded in frameworks addressing implementation of DHIs. OBJECTIVE Using cardiometabolic disease as an exemplar, this scoping review aims to assess how health inequalities are addressed in frameworks relevant to the implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, health and ethnic inequalities, and interventions for cardiometabolic disease. METHODS SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE and grey literature was searched to identify frameworks relevant to: implementation, uptake and use of DHIs; ethnically or culturally diverse populations and health inequalities; and interventions for cardiometabolic disease. We assessed the extent to which these include health inequalities, specifically regarding ethnicity; and explored how these were addressed, drawing out recommendations for good practice. RESULTS Of 58 relevant frameworks, 22 (38%) included reference to health inequalities. Inequalities were conceptualised to operate across four levels: society, system, intervention and individual. Only five frameworks considered all levels. Three frameworks considered how DHIs might interact with or exacerbate existing health inequalities; and three considered the process of implementation, uptake and use of health technologies and suggested opportunities to improve equity in digital health. Where ethnicity was considered, this was often within the broader social determinants of health. Only three frameworks explicitly addressed ethnicity: one focused on culturally tailoring DHIs; and two were applied to management of cardiometabolic disease. CONCLUSIONS Existing frameworks evaluate implementation, uptake and use of DHIs, but to consider factors related to ethnicity necessitates looking across frameworks. We have developed a guide to support future research to assess real world usability and applicability of these frameworks, to mitigate against digital health inequalities and to inform digital health policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Auscultation Quality Using Contemporary Digital Stethoscopes. The Development of Heart Failure Electronic-Message Driven Tips to Support Self-Management: Co-Design Case Study. Identifying the Severity of Heart Valve Stenosis and Regurgitation Among a Diverse Population Within an Integrated Health Care System: Natural Language Processing Approach. Smart Device Ownership and Use of Social Media, Wearable Trackers, and Health Apps Among Black Women With Hypertension in the United States: National Survey Study. A co-design case study of the development of heart failure e-TIPS to support self-management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1