{"title":"新冠肺炎期间的宗教推文:网民思想表达的定性分析","authors":"Parthasarathi, G. Kumari","doi":"10.1177/09760911221086677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study performs content analysis of the tweets on the hashtag Covidiots to comprehend the impact of religious issues and events on netizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current project intended to study and analyse ways people encountered religion on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. The said tweets are collected using the consecutive day sampling method. The focus of the study is to highlight the articulation of ideas and responses offered to the coronavirus pandemic by religious leaders, groups, and individuals and the consequent reaction of the netizens to the conduct of these religious entities to the scourge of the pandemic. This research indicates that most Twitter users were critical of opinions and actions expressed by religious entities on issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic and discarded them. It also proves that organised religions appeared out of sync with the threats posed by the pandemic and failed to resonate with society’s evolving norms.","PeriodicalId":52105,"journal":{"name":"Media Watch","volume":"13 1","pages":"104 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Tweets During COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Articulation of Ideas of Netizens\",\"authors\":\"Parthasarathi, G. Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09760911221086677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study performs content analysis of the tweets on the hashtag Covidiots to comprehend the impact of religious issues and events on netizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current project intended to study and analyse ways people encountered religion on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. The said tweets are collected using the consecutive day sampling method. The focus of the study is to highlight the articulation of ideas and responses offered to the coronavirus pandemic by religious leaders, groups, and individuals and the consequent reaction of the netizens to the conduct of these religious entities to the scourge of the pandemic. This research indicates that most Twitter users were critical of opinions and actions expressed by religious entities on issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic and discarded them. It also proves that organised religions appeared out of sync with the threats posed by the pandemic and failed to resonate with society’s evolving norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media Watch\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media Watch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911221086677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Watch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911221086677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Religious Tweets During COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Articulation of Ideas of Netizens
This study performs content analysis of the tweets on the hashtag Covidiots to comprehend the impact of religious issues and events on netizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current project intended to study and analyse ways people encountered religion on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. The said tweets are collected using the consecutive day sampling method. The focus of the study is to highlight the articulation of ideas and responses offered to the coronavirus pandemic by religious leaders, groups, and individuals and the consequent reaction of the netizens to the conduct of these religious entities to the scourge of the pandemic. This research indicates that most Twitter users were critical of opinions and actions expressed by religious entities on issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic and discarded them. It also proves that organised religions appeared out of sync with the threats posed by the pandemic and failed to resonate with society’s evolving norms.
Media WatchArts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍:
Journal of Media Watch is a double blind peer-reviewed tri-annual journal published from India. It is the only journal in the discipline from Asia and India listed in many leading indexing platforms. The journal keeps high quality peer evaluation and academic standards in all levels of its publication. Journal of Media Watch reflects empirical and fundamental research, theoretical articulations, alternative critical thinking, diverse knowledge spectrum, cognizant technologies, scientific postulates, alternative social synergies, exploratory documentations, visual enquiries, narrative argumentations, innovative interventions, and minority inclusiveness in its content and selection. The journal aims at publishing and documenting research publication in the field of communication and media studies that covers a wide range of topics and sub-fields like print media, television, radio, film, public relations, advertising, journalism and social media and the cultural impact and activation of these media in the society. It aims at providing a platform for the scholars to present their research to an international academic community with wide access and reach. Published topics in Media Watch enjoy very high impact and major citation. The journal is supported by strong international editorial advisory support from leading academicians in the world.