高等教育国际化:变化中的新参与者

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2022-04-23 DOI:10.1080/13803611.2022.2041850
Yun Ge (Rochelle) (葛贇)
{"title":"高等教育国际化:变化中的新参与者","authors":"Yun Ge (Rochelle) (葛贇)","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2022.2041850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internationalisation in higher education (IHE) is often seen as a response to globalisation (Altbach & Knight, 2007; Altbach et al., 2009; de Wit & Altbach, 2021; de Wit & Knight, 1996). Globalisation refers to “the reality shaped by an increasingly integrated world economy, new information and communications technology, the emergence of an international knowledge network, the role of the English language, and other forces beyond the control of academic institutions” (Altbach et al., 2009, p. 7). This is seen as a key force and a context that is fundamentally reshaping the role and institutional structure of higher education (Beck, 2012; Maringe & Foskett, 2010). Globalisation has driven studentmobility on a large scale through a greater awareness of information, opportunities, and increased propensity to travel. Neither education nor knowledge is restricted by the boundaries of nation-states and/or regional cultures. Academics and students can select from a vast array of educational modes and research universities on a global scale. Cross-border education, including real and virtualmovement of students, academics, and educational programmes from one country to another, has become prevalent. According to the statistics provided by Gürüz (2011), the total enrolment of international students in the whole world was only 0.11 million in 1950. The number increased from 1.35 million to 2.75 million from 1995 to 2010. Within less than a decade, the size of international education mobility further doubled to 5.3 million in 2017 (the statistics about international students were retrieved from the UNESCO website: http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow). The increased number of students reflects the rapidly enlarged size of involved institutions and higher education systems. The large-scale international student mobility is accompanied by the rise of the knowledge-based economy and the changing governance structure of higher education (de Wit & Altbach, 2021; Mok & James, 2005). In a knowledge-based society, talents and innovation are crucial for economic development and competitiveness. Driven by the requirements of economic and national development, the later part of the 20th century witnessed a trend of massive growth of higher education in many nationstates. At the same time, there has been a trend towards decentralisation and financial retrenchment in higher education. For instance, some industrialised countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, adopted neoliberal policies to restructure their public spheres (Calleja, 1995), which continue to the present. In the sphere of higher education, the adopted policies concentrated on financial cuts (Beerkens, 2003) and the rise of students as consumers in a market of universities competing for students, with the market regulated by governments in the role of providing public services to privatised higher education rather than public goods (Biesta et al., 2021). In mainland China, with the enlarged scale of higher education, the state government decentralised its regulatory model from a “state control model” to a “state supervision","PeriodicalId":47025,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research and Evaluation","volume":"27 1","pages":"229 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internationalisation of higher education: new players in a changing scene\",\"authors\":\"Yun Ge (Rochelle) (葛贇)\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803611.2022.2041850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internationalisation in higher education (IHE) is often seen as a response to globalisation (Altbach & Knight, 2007; Altbach et al., 2009; de Wit & Altbach, 2021; de Wit & Knight, 1996). Globalisation refers to “the reality shaped by an increasingly integrated world economy, new information and communications technology, the emergence of an international knowledge network, the role of the English language, and other forces beyond the control of academic institutions” (Altbach et al., 2009, p. 7). This is seen as a key force and a context that is fundamentally reshaping the role and institutional structure of higher education (Beck, 2012; Maringe & Foskett, 2010). Globalisation has driven studentmobility on a large scale through a greater awareness of information, opportunities, and increased propensity to travel. Neither education nor knowledge is restricted by the boundaries of nation-states and/or regional cultures. Academics and students can select from a vast array of educational modes and research universities on a global scale. Cross-border education, including real and virtualmovement of students, academics, and educational programmes from one country to another, has become prevalent. According to the statistics provided by Gürüz (2011), the total enrolment of international students in the whole world was only 0.11 million in 1950. The number increased from 1.35 million to 2.75 million from 1995 to 2010. Within less than a decade, the size of international education mobility further doubled to 5.3 million in 2017 (the statistics about international students were retrieved from the UNESCO website: http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow). The increased number of students reflects the rapidly enlarged size of involved institutions and higher education systems. The large-scale international student mobility is accompanied by the rise of the knowledge-based economy and the changing governance structure of higher education (de Wit & Altbach, 2021; Mok & James, 2005). In a knowledge-based society, talents and innovation are crucial for economic development and competitiveness. Driven by the requirements of economic and national development, the later part of the 20th century witnessed a trend of massive growth of higher education in many nationstates. At the same time, there has been a trend towards decentralisation and financial retrenchment in higher education. For instance, some industrialised countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, adopted neoliberal policies to restructure their public spheres (Calleja, 1995), which continue to the present. In the sphere of higher education, the adopted policies concentrated on financial cuts (Beerkens, 2003) and the rise of students as consumers in a market of universities competing for students, with the market regulated by governments in the role of providing public services to privatised higher education rather than public goods (Biesta et al., 2021). In mainland China, with the enlarged scale of higher education, the state government decentralised its regulatory model from a “state control model” to a “state supervision\",\"PeriodicalId\":47025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"229 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2022.2041850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

高等教育国际化(IHE)通常被视为对全球化的回应(Altbach&Knight,2007;Altbach等人,2009年;de Wit和Altbach,2021;de Wit&Knight,1996)。全球化是指“日益一体化的世界经济、新的信息和通信技术、国际知识网络的出现、英语的作用以及学术机构无法控制的其他力量所塑造的现实”(Altbach等人,2009年,第7页)。这被视为从根本上重塑高等教育角色和制度结构的关键力量和背景(Beck,2012;Maringe和Foskett,2010年)。全球化通过提高对信息、机会的认识和旅行倾向的增加,在很大程度上推动了学生的积极性。教育和知识都不受民族国家和/或地区文化边界的限制。学术界和学生可以从全球范围内的各种教育模式和研究型大学中进行选择。跨境教育,包括从一个国家到另一个国家的学生、学者和教育计划的真实和虚拟教育,已经变得普遍。根据Gürüz(2011)提供的统计数据,1950年,全世界的国际学生总入学人数仅为11万。从1995年到2010年,这一数字从135万增加到275万。在不到十年的时间里,2017年国际教育流动规模进一步翻了一番,达到530万(有关国际学生的统计数据可从联合国教科文组织网站检索:http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow)。学生人数的增加反映了相关机构和高等教育系统的规模迅速扩大。大规模的国际学生流动伴随着知识经济的兴起和高等教育治理结构的变化(de Wit&Altbach,2021;莫和詹姆斯,2005年)。在知识型社会,人才和创新对经济发展和竞争力至关重要。在经济和国家发展要求的推动下,20世纪后半叶,许多国家的高等教育出现了大规模增长的趋势。与此同时,高等教育出现了权力下放和财政紧缩的趋势。例如,一些工业化国家,如英国和美国,采取了新自由主义政策来重组其公共领域(Calleja,1995),这种政策一直延续到现在。在高等教育领域,所采取的政策集中在财政削减(Beerkens,2003)和在大学争夺学生的市场中,学生作为消费者的崛起,市场由政府监管,为私有化的高等教育而非公共产品提供公共服务(Biesta et al.,2021)。在中国大陆,随着高等教育规模的扩大,国家政府将其监管模式从“国家控制模式”分散到“国家监督模式”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Internationalisation of higher education: new players in a changing scene
Internationalisation in higher education (IHE) is often seen as a response to globalisation (Altbach & Knight, 2007; Altbach et al., 2009; de Wit & Altbach, 2021; de Wit & Knight, 1996). Globalisation refers to “the reality shaped by an increasingly integrated world economy, new information and communications technology, the emergence of an international knowledge network, the role of the English language, and other forces beyond the control of academic institutions” (Altbach et al., 2009, p. 7). This is seen as a key force and a context that is fundamentally reshaping the role and institutional structure of higher education (Beck, 2012; Maringe & Foskett, 2010). Globalisation has driven studentmobility on a large scale through a greater awareness of information, opportunities, and increased propensity to travel. Neither education nor knowledge is restricted by the boundaries of nation-states and/or regional cultures. Academics and students can select from a vast array of educational modes and research universities on a global scale. Cross-border education, including real and virtualmovement of students, academics, and educational programmes from one country to another, has become prevalent. According to the statistics provided by Gürüz (2011), the total enrolment of international students in the whole world was only 0.11 million in 1950. The number increased from 1.35 million to 2.75 million from 1995 to 2010. Within less than a decade, the size of international education mobility further doubled to 5.3 million in 2017 (the statistics about international students were retrieved from the UNESCO website: http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow). The increased number of students reflects the rapidly enlarged size of involved institutions and higher education systems. The large-scale international student mobility is accompanied by the rise of the knowledge-based economy and the changing governance structure of higher education (de Wit & Altbach, 2021; Mok & James, 2005). In a knowledge-based society, talents and innovation are crucial for economic development and competitiveness. Driven by the requirements of economic and national development, the later part of the 20th century witnessed a trend of massive growth of higher education in many nationstates. At the same time, there has been a trend towards decentralisation and financial retrenchment in higher education. For instance, some industrialised countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, adopted neoliberal policies to restructure their public spheres (Calleja, 1995), which continue to the present. In the sphere of higher education, the adopted policies concentrated on financial cuts (Beerkens, 2003) and the rise of students as consumers in a market of universities competing for students, with the market regulated by governments in the role of providing public services to privatised higher education rather than public goods (Biesta et al., 2021). In mainland China, with the enlarged scale of higher education, the state government decentralised its regulatory model from a “state control model” to a “state supervision
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research and Evaluation
Educational Research and Evaluation EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: International, comparative and multidisciplinary in scope, Educational Research and Evaluation (ERE) publishes original, peer-reviewed academic articles dealing with research on issues of worldwide relevance in educational practice. The aim of the journal is to increase understanding of learning in pre-primary, primary, high school, college, university and adult education, and to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes. The journal seeks to promote cross-national and international comparative educational research by publishing findings relevant to the scholarly community, as well as to practitioners and others interested in education. The scope of the journal is deliberately broad in terms of both topics covered and disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ effects on student achievement in the United States from a cumulative perspective The impact of self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ achievements in STEM disciplines Distributed leadership, self-awareness, democracy, and sustainable development: towards an integrative model of school effectiveness Does formal teacher competence matter for students’ mathematics achievement? Results from Swedish TIMSS 2019 Case study of the use of learner-centered assessment in the math school of a large university in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1