南印度三级医院中异质性万古霉素中间金黄色葡萄球菌的分子和临床特征

Q3 Medicine Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.18295/squmj.3.2023.018
M Sreejisha, M Shalini Shenoy, M Suchitra Shenoy, B Dhanashree, M Chakrapani, K Gopalakrishna Bhat
{"title":"南印度三级医院中异质性万古霉素中间金黄色葡萄球菌的分子和临床特征","authors":"M Sreejisha, M Shalini Shenoy, M Suchitra Shenoy, B Dhanashree, M Chakrapani, K Gopalakrishna Bhat","doi":"10.18295/squmj.3.2023.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (hVISA) among methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) isolated from healthcare-associated infections and identify staphylococcal cassette chromosome <i>mec</i> (SCC<i>mec</i>) types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCC<i>mec</i> types and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (<i>pvl</i>) gene were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCC<i>mec</i> III and IV were present in 50% and 35.7% of hVISA, respectively; 14.3% of the hVISA harboured SCC<i>mec</i> V.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCC<i>mec</i> III and IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":22083,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Tertiary Care Hospitals in South India.\",\"authors\":\"M Sreejisha, M Shalini Shenoy, M Suchitra Shenoy, B Dhanashree, M Chakrapani, K Gopalakrishna Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.18295/squmj.3.2023.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (hVISA) among methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) isolated from healthcare-associated infections and identify staphylococcal cassette chromosome <i>mec</i> (SCC<i>mec</i>) types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCC<i>mec</i> types and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (<i>pvl</i>) gene were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCC<i>mec</i> III and IV were present in 50% and 35.7% of hVISA, respectively; 14.3% of the hVISA harboured SCC<i>mec</i> V.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCC<i>mec</i> III and IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.3.2023.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.3.2023.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在检测从医疗保健相关感染中分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)中异种万古霉素中间型金黄色葡萄球菌(hVISA),并鉴定葡萄球菌盒染色体mec (SCCmec)类型。方法:采用标准细菌学方法对MRSA进行分离鉴定。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法进行药敏试验,采用D试验鉴定大环内酯-林科胺-链状gramin B (MLSB)表型。用琼脂稀释法测定万古霉素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。通过改良的种群分析曲线下面积(PAP-AUC)检验证实了hVISA。采用多重PCR检测SCCmec类型和pton - valentine leukocidin (pvl)。结果:220株MRSA中hVISA阳性14株(6.4%);所有MRSA分离物均无万古霉素中间或耐药。所有hVISA患者对利奈唑胺和替可普宁敏感。42.9%的hVISA患者存在大环内酯-链状gramin B (MSB)表型。92.9% hVISA菌株万古霉素MIC在1 ~ 2µg/mL范围内。hVISA和万古霉素敏感MRSA主要来源于皮肤和软组织感染。SCCmec III型和IV型在hVISA中分别占50%和35.7%。结论:hVISA在MRSA中的感染率为6.4%。在开始万古霉素治疗之前,应该对MRSA菌株进行hVISA检测。所有分离株均无万古霉素中间或耐药。所有hVISA菌株对利奈唑胺和替可普宁敏感。大多数hVISA是从皮肤和软组织感染中分离出来的。大多数hVISA携带SCCmec III和IV。关键词:MRSA;医院感染;分子类型;万古霉素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Tertiary Care Hospitals in South India.

Objectives: This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from healthcare-associated infections and identify staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types.

Methods: This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCCmec types and the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) gene were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Results: Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCCmec III and IV were present in 50% and 35.7% of hVISA, respectively; 14.3% of the hVISA harboured SCCmec V.

Conclusion: The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCCmec III and IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
18th Asian Federation of Sports Medicine Congress cum 8th ISN international Sports Medicine & Sports Science Conference: Sabah International Convention Centre, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 26-28 April 2024. Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm. Re: Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin and Remogliflozin as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Short-term Weight Loss Outcomes of 104 Mini Gastric Bypass or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Operations A Case of Mirizzi Syndrome with Pancreatic Divisum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1