人文主义教育的倡导者罗素和乔姆斯基

Q4 Social Sciences Philosophical Inquiry in Education Pub Date : 2020-11-22 DOI:10.7202/1074043AR
Howard R. Woodhouse
{"title":"人文主义教育的倡导者罗素和乔姆斯基","authors":"Howard R. Woodhouse","doi":"10.7202/1074043AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows how Bertrand Russell and Noam Chomsky’s approaches to humanistic education are grounded in the concepts of growth, knowledge, language, freedom, and social justice. Despite their epistemological differences, Russell and Chomsky agree on the need for educating the public to abuses of power. Their own practice of education is a source of inspiration for intellectuals, who wish to counter the current discourse in schools and universities by upholding the value of academic freedom.","PeriodicalId":36151,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russell and Chomsky as Advocates of Humanistic Education\",\"authors\":\"Howard R. Woodhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1074043AR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article shows how Bertrand Russell and Noam Chomsky’s approaches to humanistic education are grounded in the concepts of growth, knowledge, language, freedom, and social justice. Despite their epistemological differences, Russell and Chomsky agree on the need for educating the public to abuses of power. Their own practice of education is a source of inspiration for intellectuals, who wish to counter the current discourse in schools and universities by upholding the value of academic freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1074043AR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1074043AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文展示了伯特兰·罗素和诺姆·乔姆斯基的人文教育方法是如何建立在成长、知识、语言、自由和社会正义等概念的基础上的。尽管罗素和乔姆斯基在认识论上存在分歧,但他们都认为有必要对公众进行权力滥用教育。他们自己的教育实践是知识分子的灵感来源,他们希望通过维护学术自由的价值来对抗当前学校和大学的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russell and Chomsky as Advocates of Humanistic Education
This article shows how Bertrand Russell and Noam Chomsky’s approaches to humanistic education are grounded in the concepts of growth, knowledge, language, freedom, and social justice. Despite their epistemological differences, Russell and Chomsky agree on the need for educating the public to abuses of power. Their own practice of education is a source of inspiration for intellectuals, who wish to counter the current discourse in schools and universities by upholding the value of academic freedom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophical Inquiry in Education
Philosophical Inquiry in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education after COVID Promoting Critical Thinking in Anti-Critical Thinking Times: Lessons from COVID Discourse When the Façade of the Normal Falls Away Demoralization and Remoralization: The Power of Creating Space for Teachers’ Moral Centres Pandemic Resurrection: Making Gendered Citizenship Visible in a “Postfeminist” Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1