枪支补贴

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Buffalo Law Review Pub Date : 2020-02-12 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3537278
C. Turner, Justin C. Van Orsdol
{"title":"枪支补贴","authors":"C. Turner, Justin C. Van Orsdol","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3537278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite thousands of gun deaths annually, the United States has failed to reach consensus on any means of addressing the public health crisis that is gun violence. The issue has become politically polarized, constitutionalized, and an object of pessimism and despair. We propose a regulatory system in which gun manufacturers would be strictly liable to a federal fund for deaths caused by their guns, paired with a subsidy that will serve to ensure the availability of guns sufficient to meet the rights the Supreme Court has found in the Second Amendment. While strict liability of this kind can indeed serve its traditional purposes of spreading costs and incentivizing better designs and processes, our primary goal is to alter the political economy around the issue of gun violence more generally. If manufacturers bear an increasing share of the costs created by their products, they will endeavor not only to produce products and advertise them in ways likely to reduce those costs but also to advocate for regulations that may do the same. While our proposal may not depolarize the issue entirely, it at least attempts to focus the minds and experience of those who know guns best on effective means of reducing guns’ social costs.","PeriodicalId":51843,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Law Review","volume":"68 1","pages":"1117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gun Subsidy\",\"authors\":\"C. Turner, Justin C. Van Orsdol\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3537278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite thousands of gun deaths annually, the United States has failed to reach consensus on any means of addressing the public health crisis that is gun violence. The issue has become politically polarized, constitutionalized, and an object of pessimism and despair. We propose a regulatory system in which gun manufacturers would be strictly liable to a federal fund for deaths caused by their guns, paired with a subsidy that will serve to ensure the availability of guns sufficient to meet the rights the Supreme Court has found in the Second Amendment. While strict liability of this kind can indeed serve its traditional purposes of spreading costs and incentivizing better designs and processes, our primary goal is to alter the political economy around the issue of gun violence more generally. If manufacturers bear an increasing share of the costs created by their products, they will endeavor not only to produce products and advertise them in ways likely to reduce those costs but also to advocate for regulations that may do the same. While our proposal may not depolarize the issue entirely, it at least attempts to focus the minds and experience of those who know guns best on effective means of reducing guns’ social costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buffalo Law Review\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buffalo Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管每年有数千人死于枪支,但美国未能就解决枪支暴力引发的公共卫生危机达成任何共识。这个问题已经在政治上两极化,宪法化,成为悲观和绝望的对象。我们建议建立一个监管体系,在这个体系中,枪支制造商将严格地对由他们的枪支造成的死亡承担联邦基金的责任,并提供补贴,以确保枪支的可获得性足以满足最高法院在《第二修正案》中规定的权利。虽然这种严格责任确实可以达到分摊成本和激励更好的设计和流程的传统目的,但我们的主要目标是更广泛地改变围绕枪支暴力问题的政治经济学。如果制造商承担越来越多的产品成本,他们不仅会努力以可能降低成本的方式生产产品和宣传产品,而且还会倡导可能降低成本的法规。虽然我们的提议可能不会完全消除这个问题的两极化,但它至少试图将那些最了解枪支的人的思想和经验集中在减少枪支社会成本的有效手段上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Gun Subsidy
Despite thousands of gun deaths annually, the United States has failed to reach consensus on any means of addressing the public health crisis that is gun violence. The issue has become politically polarized, constitutionalized, and an object of pessimism and despair. We propose a regulatory system in which gun manufacturers would be strictly liable to a federal fund for deaths caused by their guns, paired with a subsidy that will serve to ensure the availability of guns sufficient to meet the rights the Supreme Court has found in the Second Amendment. While strict liability of this kind can indeed serve its traditional purposes of spreading costs and incentivizing better designs and processes, our primary goal is to alter the political economy around the issue of gun violence more generally. If manufacturers bear an increasing share of the costs created by their products, they will endeavor not only to produce products and advertise them in ways likely to reduce those costs but also to advocate for regulations that may do the same. While our proposal may not depolarize the issue entirely, it at least attempts to focus the minds and experience of those who know guns best on effective means of reducing guns’ social costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Founded in 1951, the Buffalo Law Review is a generalist law review that publishes articles by practitioners, professors, and students in all areas of the law. The Buffalo Law Review has a subscription base of well over 600 institutions and individuals. The Buffalo Law Review currently publishes five issues per year with each issue containing approximately four articles and one member-written comment per issue.
期刊最新文献
The Gun Subsidy Abandoning Realization and the Transition Tax: Toward a Comprehensive Tax Base Rules, Standards, and Such What the Judge Had for Breakfast: A Brief History of an Unpalatable Idea Re-Reading Legal Realism and Tracing a Genealogy of Balancing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1