昆士兰州北部出现风暴潮

IF 1.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.47389/36.4.75
Kristy J. Livock, A. Swinbourne
{"title":"昆士兰州北部出现风暴潮","authors":"Kristy J. Livock, A. Swinbourne","doi":"10.47389/36.4.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Storm surges have the potential to bring widespread damage to the north Australian coastline. The dangers from the wind aspect of cyclones are well understood, however, it is unclear if the same can be said about the potential dangers from accompanying storm surges. This study explored the differences between how cyclones and storm surges are perceived by people who are vulnerable to such events. It is important to consider these aspects given that storm surges have not occurred frequently in the past but may happen more often in the future. The sample consisted of 231 undergraduate students studying psychology subjects at James Cook University in Townsville in north Queensland. Participants were asked to record their experience with cyclones and storm surges, their understanding of official warnings used when these events are imminent and a self-assessment of their ability to plan and prepared for these events. Perceptions of severity, possible negative consequences, likelihood and preparedness for both events were also obtained. The results demonstrated that participants living in this region are not as familiar with the particulars of storms surges as they are with cyclones. This study suggests that further research is needed to understand how experience can both facilitate and impede perception of risk, so that risk communication can be best structured for people who do not perceive themselves as being vulnerable.","PeriodicalId":46191,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Emergency Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of storm surges in north Queensland\",\"authors\":\"Kristy J. Livock, A. Swinbourne\",\"doi\":\"10.47389/36.4.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Storm surges have the potential to bring widespread damage to the north Australian coastline. The dangers from the wind aspect of cyclones are well understood, however, it is unclear if the same can be said about the potential dangers from accompanying storm surges. This study explored the differences between how cyclones and storm surges are perceived by people who are vulnerable to such events. It is important to consider these aspects given that storm surges have not occurred frequently in the past but may happen more often in the future. The sample consisted of 231 undergraduate students studying psychology subjects at James Cook University in Townsville in north Queensland. Participants were asked to record their experience with cyclones and storm surges, their understanding of official warnings used when these events are imminent and a self-assessment of their ability to plan and prepared for these events. Perceptions of severity, possible negative consequences, likelihood and preparedness for both events were also obtained. The results demonstrated that participants living in this region are not as familiar with the particulars of storms surges as they are with cyclones. This study suggests that further research is needed to understand how experience can both facilitate and impede perception of risk, so that risk communication can be best structured for people who do not perceive themselves as being vulnerable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Emergency Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Emergency Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47389/36.4.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47389/36.4.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

风暴潮有可能给澳大利亚北部海岸线带来广泛的破坏。从风的角度来看,飓风带来的危险是众所周知的,然而,尚不清楚伴随风暴潮的潜在危险是否也同样如此。这项研究探讨了易受此类事件影响的人们对旋风和风暴潮的感知差异。考虑到风暴潮在过去并不经常发生,但将来可能会更频繁地发生,考虑这些方面是很重要的。样本包括在昆士兰北部汤斯维尔的詹姆斯库克大学学习心理学科目的231名本科生。参与者被要求记录他们对飓风和风暴潮的经历,他们对这些事件即将发生时使用的官方警告的理解,以及他们对这些事件的计划和准备能力的自我评估。还获得了对这两种事件的严重性、可能的负面后果、可能性和准备情况的看法。结果表明,生活在该地区的参与者对风暴潮的细节不像对气旋那样熟悉。这项研究表明,需要进一步的研究来了解经验是如何促进和阻碍对风险的感知的,这样才能最好地为那些不认为自己是脆弱的人组织风险沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of storm surges in north Queensland
Storm surges have the potential to bring widespread damage to the north Australian coastline. The dangers from the wind aspect of cyclones are well understood, however, it is unclear if the same can be said about the potential dangers from accompanying storm surges. This study explored the differences between how cyclones and storm surges are perceived by people who are vulnerable to such events. It is important to consider these aspects given that storm surges have not occurred frequently in the past but may happen more often in the future. The sample consisted of 231 undergraduate students studying psychology subjects at James Cook University in Townsville in north Queensland. Participants were asked to record their experience with cyclones and storm surges, their understanding of official warnings used when these events are imminent and a self-assessment of their ability to plan and prepared for these events. Perceptions of severity, possible negative consequences, likelihood and preparedness for both events were also obtained. The results demonstrated that participants living in this region are not as familiar with the particulars of storms surges as they are with cyclones. This study suggests that further research is needed to understand how experience can both facilitate and impede perception of risk, so that risk communication can be best structured for people who do not perceive themselves as being vulnerable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Emergency Management
Australian Journal of Emergency Management PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Emergency Management is an academic journal in emergency management covering all hazards and all emergencies with a primary focus on the Oceania region. The journal includes research and practice as well as issues from government policy to community engagement. The AJEM focuses on risk reduction, readiness, response, recovery and resilience particularly for Australasia, New Zealand and the Pacific region. Research presented in the AJEM is evidence-based and peer-reviewed. AJEM is an open access publication under a Creative Commons [CC BY-NC] license. This allows free and immediate access to scholarly articles and industry news and views. The AJEM does not charge author fees.
期刊最新文献
Ready to respond: preparing firefighters for non-fire incidents Pets and smoke inhalation: improving immediate and prehospital management Australian Red Cross psychosocial approach to disaster preparedness Who is a lost wilderness tourist? PPRR and AIIMS: a whole-of-government strategy in NSW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1