与重新进入的客户一起管理队列以支持混合医疗保健

Q1 Mathematics Stochastic Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1287/stsy.2022.0105
Noa Zychlinski
{"title":"与重新进入的客户一起管理队列以支持混合医疗保健","authors":"Noa Zychlinski","doi":"10.1287/stsy.2022.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly boosted the use of hybrid healthcare settings, which orchestrate face-to-face services together with virtual ones. The advantages of virtual healthcare services are clear: they are less costly and less disruptive for patients who can receive the service in the comfort of their home and reduce patients’ exposure to illnesses prevalent in healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, there is evidence that patients are likely to require a supplementary in-person service upon completion of their virtual service. Motivated by such settings, we study a multiservice queueing system with face-to-face, virtual, and supplementary service channels. The service operator needs to allocate service capacity among the three classes and decide how to prioritize the patients when a service provider becomes available. The strong dependency between virtual and supplementary visits makes the problem challenging. Based on a fluid relaxation, we develop an index-based policy, the [Formula: see text] rule (or the [Formula: see text] rule in short), which, in addition to the holding cost, service time, abandonment rate, and service reward, also carefully balances the return probability and associated penalty. The theoretical results along with numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed policy and the importance of capacity coordination when managing hybrid service settings. Our work provides insights on the trade-off between convenience and the value of care when offering virtual healthcare services. Funding: The author was supported in part by an Israel Science Foundation [Grant 277/21] and the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research [Grant 2021/160/R].","PeriodicalId":36337,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Queues with Reentrant Customers in Support of Hybrid Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Noa Zychlinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/stsy.2022.0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly boosted the use of hybrid healthcare settings, which orchestrate face-to-face services together with virtual ones. The advantages of virtual healthcare services are clear: they are less costly and less disruptive for patients who can receive the service in the comfort of their home and reduce patients’ exposure to illnesses prevalent in healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, there is evidence that patients are likely to require a supplementary in-person service upon completion of their virtual service. Motivated by such settings, we study a multiservice queueing system with face-to-face, virtual, and supplementary service channels. The service operator needs to allocate service capacity among the three classes and decide how to prioritize the patients when a service provider becomes available. The strong dependency between virtual and supplementary visits makes the problem challenging. Based on a fluid relaxation, we develop an index-based policy, the [Formula: see text] rule (or the [Formula: see text] rule in short), which, in addition to the holding cost, service time, abandonment rate, and service reward, also carefully balances the return probability and associated penalty. The theoretical results along with numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed policy and the importance of capacity coordination when managing hybrid service settings. Our work provides insights on the trade-off between convenience and the value of care when offering virtual healthcare services. Funding: The author was supported in part by an Israel Science Foundation [Grant 277/21] and the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research [Grant 2021/160/R].\",\"PeriodicalId\":36337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stochastic Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stochastic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/stsy.2022.0105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/stsy.2022.0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行极大地推动了混合医疗环境的使用,这种环境将面对面服务与虚拟服务结合起来。虚拟医疗服务的优势是显而易见的:对于那些可以在舒适的家中接受服务的患者来说,它们成本更低,干扰更小,并减少了患者接触医疗机构中流行疾病的风险。尽管如此,有证据表明,患者在完成虚拟服务后可能需要补充的当面服务。受此启发,我们研究了一个具有面对面、虚拟和补充服务渠道的多服务排队系统。服务运营商需要在三个类别中分配服务能力,并在服务提供商可用时决定如何优先考虑患者。虚拟访问和补充访问之间的强烈依赖性使这个问题具有挑战性。在流动放松的基础上,我们开发了一种基于指数的策略,即[公式:见正文]规则(简称[公式:看正文]规则),除了持有成本、服务时间、放弃率和服务奖励外,还仔细平衡了回报概率和相关惩罚。理论结果和数值实验证明了所提出的策略的有效性以及在管理混合服务设置时容量协调的重要性。我们的工作深入了解了在提供虚拟医疗服务时方便性和护理价值之间的权衡。资助:作者得到了以色列科学基金会[277/21]和以色列国家卫生政策研究所[2021/160/R]的部分资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Queues with Reentrant Customers in Support of Hybrid Healthcare
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly boosted the use of hybrid healthcare settings, which orchestrate face-to-face services together with virtual ones. The advantages of virtual healthcare services are clear: they are less costly and less disruptive for patients who can receive the service in the comfort of their home and reduce patients’ exposure to illnesses prevalent in healthcare facilities. Nevertheless, there is evidence that patients are likely to require a supplementary in-person service upon completion of their virtual service. Motivated by such settings, we study a multiservice queueing system with face-to-face, virtual, and supplementary service channels. The service operator needs to allocate service capacity among the three classes and decide how to prioritize the patients when a service provider becomes available. The strong dependency between virtual and supplementary visits makes the problem challenging. Based on a fluid relaxation, we develop an index-based policy, the [Formula: see text] rule (or the [Formula: see text] rule in short), which, in addition to the holding cost, service time, abandonment rate, and service reward, also carefully balances the return probability and associated penalty. The theoretical results along with numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed policy and the importance of capacity coordination when managing hybrid service settings. Our work provides insights on the trade-off between convenience and the value of care when offering virtual healthcare services. Funding: The author was supported in part by an Israel Science Foundation [Grant 277/21] and the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research [Grant 2021/160/R].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stochastic Systems
Stochastic Systems Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Sharp Waiting-Time Bounds for Multiserver Jobs Asymptotic Optimality of Switched Control Policies in a Simple Parallel Server System Under an Extended Heavy Traffic Condition Distributionally Robust Observable Strategic Queues The BAR Approach for Multiclass Queueing Networks with SBP Service Policies Ergodic Control of Bipartite Matching Queues with Class Change and Matching Failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1