澳大利亚和新西兰的战略传播分层(2016-2020)

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asian Perspective Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1353/apr.2021.0028
C. Wallace
{"title":"澳大利亚和新西兰的战略传播分层(2016-2020)","authors":"C. Wallace","doi":"10.1353/apr.2021.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Around 2016, the Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand governments began to disassemble the coherent and optimistic imagery that had hitherto signaled their strategic commitment to accommodating China within an interdependent, prosperous, and strategically stable Asia-Pacific. While Canberra and Wellington remain committed to constructive \"bedrock\" bilateral relations and still avoid explicitly positioning China as a direct threat in their strategic messaging, both governments have increasingly communicated (1) concerns about their strategic vulnerability and military insecurity that requires enhanced military potency; (2) pessimism that great power competition could disrupt Asia-Pacific stability, requiring strategic diversification and cross-bracing with \"Indo-Pacific\" partners; and (3) stronger official criticism on narrower, strategically circumscribed issue sets as the two nations attempt to set acceptable terms for anticipated relations of greater future complexity with China. The targets of this \"layered\" approach to strategic communications are not only Beijing and Washington, DC, but increasingly other important regional partners and domestic stakeholder audiences with diverse interests.","PeriodicalId":45424,"journal":{"name":"Asian Perspective","volume":"45 1","pages":"587 - 620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand's Layering of Strategic Communications (2016–2020)\",\"authors\":\"C. Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apr.2021.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Around 2016, the Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand governments began to disassemble the coherent and optimistic imagery that had hitherto signaled their strategic commitment to accommodating China within an interdependent, prosperous, and strategically stable Asia-Pacific. While Canberra and Wellington remain committed to constructive \\\"bedrock\\\" bilateral relations and still avoid explicitly positioning China as a direct threat in their strategic messaging, both governments have increasingly communicated (1) concerns about their strategic vulnerability and military insecurity that requires enhanced military potency; (2) pessimism that great power competition could disrupt Asia-Pacific stability, requiring strategic diversification and cross-bracing with \\\"Indo-Pacific\\\" partners; and (3) stronger official criticism on narrower, strategically circumscribed issue sets as the two nations attempt to set acceptable terms for anticipated relations of greater future complexity with China. The targets of this \\\"layered\\\" approach to strategic communications are not only Beijing and Washington, DC, but increasingly other important regional partners and domestic stakeholder audiences with diverse interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"587 - 620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:2016年前后,澳大利亚和新西兰政府开始打破一贯的乐观形象,这种形象迄今为止表明了他们的战略承诺,即在一个相互依存、繁荣和战略稳定的亚太地区容纳中国。虽然堪培拉和惠灵顿仍然致力于建设性的“基石”双边关系,并且仍然避免在其战略信息中明确将中国定位为直接威胁,但两国政府越来越多地沟通了以下问题:(1)对其战略脆弱性和军事不安全感的担忧,这需要增强军事实力;(2)悲观地认为,大国竞争可能破坏亚太稳定,需要战略多样化,并与“印太”伙伴交叉支撑;(3)两国试图为未来与中国更复杂的预期关系设定可接受的条件,因此两国在更狭窄、战略上受到限制的问题上进行更强烈的官方批评。这种“分层”战略沟通方法的目标不仅是北京和华盛顿特区,而且越来越多的其他重要的地区合作伙伴和具有不同利益的国内利益相关者受众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand's Layering of Strategic Communications (2016–2020)
Abstract:Around 2016, the Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand governments began to disassemble the coherent and optimistic imagery that had hitherto signaled their strategic commitment to accommodating China within an interdependent, prosperous, and strategically stable Asia-Pacific. While Canberra and Wellington remain committed to constructive "bedrock" bilateral relations and still avoid explicitly positioning China as a direct threat in their strategic messaging, both governments have increasingly communicated (1) concerns about their strategic vulnerability and military insecurity that requires enhanced military potency; (2) pessimism that great power competition could disrupt Asia-Pacific stability, requiring strategic diversification and cross-bracing with "Indo-Pacific" partners; and (3) stronger official criticism on narrower, strategically circumscribed issue sets as the two nations attempt to set acceptable terms for anticipated relations of greater future complexity with China. The targets of this "layered" approach to strategic communications are not only Beijing and Washington, DC, but increasingly other important regional partners and domestic stakeholder audiences with diverse interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Perspective
Asian Perspective INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: ASIAN PERSPECTIVE is the peer-reviewed social sciences journal of world/comparative politics of the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University. Published quarterly, Asian Perspective has devoted its pages to critical analysis of the global, regional, and transnational issues affecting Northeast Asia for over 25 years. Bringing cogent, thought-provoking examination of the significant developments in Asia and the world as they unfold to the scrutiny of its readership, Asian Perspective continues to promote a healthy exchange of ideas among scholars, students, and policymakers.
期刊最新文献
Stay Useful, Stay Relevant: Singapore's Institutional Diplomacy toward China's Belt and Road Initiative Response from the Author The Politics of Social Reproduction and the Vicissitudes of 'Surplus Population' Special Session Introduction China's Rise in Asia: China-Host Country Interactions and Transformations Industrialization in an Age of China Rising: A Tale of Two Chinese Automobile Companies in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1