探索一年级和四年级大学生的批判性思维技能水平在阿拉伯开放大学-约旦

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculum and Teaching Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.7459/ct/37.2.05
Naima Al-husban, Majdi Mashaleh, Laila Damrah
{"title":"探索一年级和四年级大学生的批判性思维技能水平在阿拉伯开放大学-约旦","authors":"Naima Al-husban, Majdi Mashaleh, Laila Damrah","doi":"10.7459/ct/37.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore Arab Open University- Jordan (AOU) students’ critical thinking skills, and whether these skills varied according to variables like their university level (first and fourth year of study), gender, age, and major at university. 248 students have been randomly\n chosen to participate in the study. California Critical Thinking Skills Test was used to collect data. The study revealed that students’ general levels of critical thinking were below the acceptable educational level, and students in the fourth year had better critical thinking skills\n than students in the first year. Additionally, females showed a higher level of critical thinking than males whereas age and major did not play a major role in developing critical thinking skills. Based on the results, reforms in the education system should be initiated in terms of course\n content, instruction, and evaluation. Further research should also be conducted to determine which factors contribute to developing students’ critical thinking skills","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring First and Fourth Year University Students’ Level of Critical Thinking Skills at Arab Open University- Jordan\",\"authors\":\"Naima Al-husban, Majdi Mashaleh, Laila Damrah\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/ct/37.2.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to explore Arab Open University- Jordan (AOU) students’ critical thinking skills, and whether these skills varied according to variables like their university level (first and fourth year of study), gender, age, and major at university. 248 students have been randomly\\n chosen to participate in the study. California Critical Thinking Skills Test was used to collect data. The study revealed that students’ general levels of critical thinking were below the acceptable educational level, and students in the fourth year had better critical thinking skills\\n than students in the first year. Additionally, females showed a higher level of critical thinking than males whereas age and major did not play a major role in developing critical thinking skills. Based on the results, reforms in the education system should be initiated in terms of course\\n content, instruction, and evaluation. Further research should also be conducted to determine which factors contribute to developing students’ critical thinking skills\",\"PeriodicalId\":35186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.2.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨约旦阿拉伯开放大学(AOU)学生的批判性思维技能,以及这些技能是否因大学水平(学习第一年和第四年)、性别、年龄和大学专业等变量而异。248名学生被随机选择参加这项研究。加州批判性思维技能测试用于收集数据。研究表明,学生的批判性思维总体水平低于可接受的教育水平,第四年的学生比第一年的学生有更好的批判性思维技能。此外,女性比男性表现出更高的批判性思维水平,而年龄和专业在发展批判性思维技能方面并不起主要作用。根据这些结果,应该在课程内容、教学和评估方面启动教育系统的改革。还应进行进一步的研究,以确定哪些因素有助于培养学生的批判性思维技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring First and Fourth Year University Students’ Level of Critical Thinking Skills at Arab Open University- Jordan
This study aims to explore Arab Open University- Jordan (AOU) students’ critical thinking skills, and whether these skills varied according to variables like their university level (first and fourth year of study), gender, age, and major at university. 248 students have been randomly chosen to participate in the study. California Critical Thinking Skills Test was used to collect data. The study revealed that students’ general levels of critical thinking were below the acceptable educational level, and students in the fourth year had better critical thinking skills than students in the first year. Additionally, females showed a higher level of critical thinking than males whereas age and major did not play a major role in developing critical thinking skills. Based on the results, reforms in the education system should be initiated in terms of course content, instruction, and evaluation. Further research should also be conducted to determine which factors contribute to developing students’ critical thinking skills
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum and Teaching
Curriculum and Teaching Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.
期刊最新文献
Combined Teaching Strategies as an Attitude Changing Tool Towards Inclusive Education Quality Education in Schools Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Assessment Instrument for Teachers in Higher Education Curriculum Management in Higher Education: An Analysis Using the Four Frames Model Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1