加拿大脆弱性优先事项设定伙伴关系:针对老年人的脆弱性研究优先事项

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.5770/CGJ.22.336
Jennifer Bethell, M. Puts, S. Sattar, M. Andrew, Andrew S. Choate, Barry Clarke, K. Cowan, C. DeAngelis, J. Elliott, M. Fitch, Chris Frank, Kathryn Hominick, M. Keatings, J. Mcelhaney, S. McKay, E. Pitters, J. Ploeg, S. Sidani, K. McGilton
{"title":"加拿大脆弱性优先事项设定伙伴关系:针对老年人的脆弱性研究优先事项","authors":"Jennifer Bethell, M. Puts, S. Sattar, M. Andrew, Andrew S. Choate, Barry Clarke, K. Cowan, C. DeAngelis, J. Elliott, M. Fitch, Chris Frank, Kathryn Hominick, M. Keatings, J. Mcelhaney, S. McKay, E. Pitters, J. Ploeg, S. Sidani, K. McGilton","doi":"10.5770/CGJ.22.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Patient engagement in research priority-setting is intended to democratize research and increase impact. The objectives of the Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) were to engage people with lived or clinical experience of frailty, and produce a list of research priorities related to care, support, and treatment of older adults living with frailty. Methods The Canadian Frailty PSP was supported by the Canadian Frailty Network, coordinated by researchers in Toronto, Ontario and followed the methods of the James Lind Alliance, which included establishing a Steering Group, inviting partner organizations, gathering questions related to care, support and treatment of older adults living with frailty, processing the data and prioritizing the questions. Results In the initial survey, 799 submissions were provided by 389 individuals and groups. The 647 questions that were within scope were categorized, merged, and summarized, then checked against research evidence, creating a list of 41 unanswered questions. Prioritization took place in two stages: first, 146 individuals and groups participated in survey and their responses short-listed 22 questions; and second, an in-person workshop was held on September 26, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario where these 22 questions were discussed and ranked. Conclusion Researchers and research funders can use these results to inform their agendas for research on frailty. Strategies are needed for involving those with lived experience of frailty in research.","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"23 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership: Research Priorities for Older Adults Living with Frailty\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Bethell, M. Puts, S. Sattar, M. Andrew, Andrew S. Choate, Barry Clarke, K. Cowan, C. DeAngelis, J. Elliott, M. Fitch, Chris Frank, Kathryn Hominick, M. Keatings, J. Mcelhaney, S. McKay, E. Pitters, J. Ploeg, S. Sidani, K. McGilton\",\"doi\":\"10.5770/CGJ.22.336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Patient engagement in research priority-setting is intended to democratize research and increase impact. The objectives of the Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) were to engage people with lived or clinical experience of frailty, and produce a list of research priorities related to care, support, and treatment of older adults living with frailty. Methods The Canadian Frailty PSP was supported by the Canadian Frailty Network, coordinated by researchers in Toronto, Ontario and followed the methods of the James Lind Alliance, which included establishing a Steering Group, inviting partner organizations, gathering questions related to care, support and treatment of older adults living with frailty, processing the data and prioritizing the questions. Results In the initial survey, 799 submissions were provided by 389 individuals and groups. The 647 questions that were within scope were categorized, merged, and summarized, then checked against research evidence, creating a list of 41 unanswered questions. Prioritization took place in two stages: first, 146 individuals and groups participated in survey and their responses short-listed 22 questions; and second, an in-person workshop was held on September 26, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario where these 22 questions were discussed and ranked. Conclusion Researchers and research funders can use these results to inform their agendas for research on frailty. Strategies are needed for involving those with lived experience of frailty in research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5770/CGJ.22.336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/CGJ.22.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景患者参与研究优先级设置旨在使研究民主化并增加影响力。加拿大虚弱优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP)的目标是让有虚弱生活或临床经验的人参与进来,并制定一份与照顾、支持和治疗患有虚弱的老年人有关的研究优先事项清单。方法加拿大虚弱PSP得到加拿大虚弱网络的支持,由安大略省多伦多市的研究人员协调,并遵循詹姆斯·林德联盟的方法,包括成立指导小组,邀请合作组织,收集与照顾、支持和治疗老年体弱者有关的问题,处理数据并确定问题的优先级。结果在初步调查中,389个个人和团体提交了799份意见书。对范围内的647个问题进行分类、合并和总结,然后与研究证据进行核对,形成了一个包含41个未回答问题的列表。优先排序分为两个阶段:首先,146名个人和团体参加了调查,他们的回答列出了22个问题;其次,2017年9月26日在安大略省多伦多市举行了一次面对面研讨会,对这22个问题进行了讨论和排名。结论研究人员和研究资助者可以利用这些结果为他们的虚弱研究议程提供信息。需要采取策略,让那些有虚弱生活经历的人参与研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership: Research Priorities for Older Adults Living with Frailty
Background Patient engagement in research priority-setting is intended to democratize research and increase impact. The objectives of the Canadian Frailty Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) were to engage people with lived or clinical experience of frailty, and produce a list of research priorities related to care, support, and treatment of older adults living with frailty. Methods The Canadian Frailty PSP was supported by the Canadian Frailty Network, coordinated by researchers in Toronto, Ontario and followed the methods of the James Lind Alliance, which included establishing a Steering Group, inviting partner organizations, gathering questions related to care, support and treatment of older adults living with frailty, processing the data and prioritizing the questions. Results In the initial survey, 799 submissions were provided by 389 individuals and groups. The 647 questions that were within scope were categorized, merged, and summarized, then checked against research evidence, creating a list of 41 unanswered questions. Prioritization took place in two stages: first, 146 individuals and groups participated in survey and their responses short-listed 22 questions; and second, an in-person workshop was held on September 26, 2017 in Toronto, Ontario where these 22 questions were discussed and ranked. Conclusion Researchers and research funders can use these results to inform their agendas for research on frailty. Strategies are needed for involving those with lived experience of frailty in research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
期刊最新文献
"How Can We Help You?" Older Adults' and Care Partners' Perspectives on Improving Care in Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Balancing Patients' Eating Habits with Planetary Health-Pilot Study to Decrease Food Waste with Vegetarian Lunches using a Quality Improvement Approach. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults. Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1