前言:莎士比亚与米尔顿

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY Milton Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0001
Stephen B. Dobranski, N. McDowell, L. Magnusson, Tianhu Hao, J. Rumrich, Benjamin Card, D. Kastan, M. Kilgour, P. Stevens
{"title":"前言:莎士比亚与米尔顿","authors":"Stephen B. Dobranski, N. McDowell, L. Magnusson, Tianhu Hao, J. Rumrich, Benjamin Card, D. Kastan, M. Kilgour, P. Stevens","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:How are we to connect the way that Milton uses Charles I’s love of Shakespeare against him in Eikonoklastes (1649) with the evidence of Milton’s own close appreciation of Shakespeare in his copy of the First Folio, recently identified in the Free Library of Philadelphia? Is there any relationship between the linguistic and textual fascination with Shakespeare on display in the Philadelphia Folio and the polemical quotation of Shakespeare in the prose, or should we focus on the difference between them? This article makes the case that there is a relationship between Milton’s use of the First Folio and the political prose, but one that has less to do with content or with Milton’s attitudes toward Shakespeare per se than with critical methods of reading. This relationship exemplifies the effect of polemicization on literary and textual criticism, as on every aspect of British culture, during the Civil Wars of the 1640s.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"65 1","pages":"1 - 100 - 121 - 122 - 152 - 153 - 180 - 30 - 31 - 46 - 47 - 6 - 7 - 70 - 71 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preface: Shakespeare and Milton\",\"authors\":\"Stephen B. Dobranski, N. McDowell, L. Magnusson, Tianhu Hao, J. Rumrich, Benjamin Card, D. Kastan, M. Kilgour, P. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:How are we to connect the way that Milton uses Charles I’s love of Shakespeare against him in Eikonoklastes (1649) with the evidence of Milton’s own close appreciation of Shakespeare in his copy of the First Folio, recently identified in the Free Library of Philadelphia? Is there any relationship between the linguistic and textual fascination with Shakespeare on display in the Philadelphia Folio and the polemical quotation of Shakespeare in the prose, or should we focus on the difference between them? This article makes the case that there is a relationship between Milton’s use of the First Folio and the political prose, but one that has less to do with content or with Milton’s attitudes toward Shakespeare per se than with critical methods of reading. This relationship exemplifies the effect of polemicization on literary and textual criticism, as on every aspect of British culture, during the Civil Wars of the 1640s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 100 - 121 - 122 - 152 - 153 - 180 - 30 - 31 - 46 - 47 - 6 - 7 - 70 - 71 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:我们如何将米尔顿在1649年的《艾科诺克拉斯特集》中利用查理一世对莎士比亚的爱来反对他的方式与米尔顿自己在最近在费城自由图书馆发现的《第一对开本》中对莎士比亚的密切欣赏的证据联系起来?《费城对开本》中展现的对莎士比亚的语言和文本迷恋与散文中对莎士比亚的争论性引用之间有什么关系吗?还是我们应该关注它们之间的区别?这篇文章表明,米尔顿对《第一对开本》的使用与政治散文之间存在关系,但与内容或米尔顿对莎士比亚本身的态度无关,而与批判性阅读方法无关。这种关系体现了1640年代内战期间,论战对文学和文本批评的影响,以及对英国文化各个方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preface: Shakespeare and Milton
abstract:How are we to connect the way that Milton uses Charles I’s love of Shakespeare against him in Eikonoklastes (1649) with the evidence of Milton’s own close appreciation of Shakespeare in his copy of the First Folio, recently identified in the Free Library of Philadelphia? Is there any relationship between the linguistic and textual fascination with Shakespeare on display in the Philadelphia Folio and the polemical quotation of Shakespeare in the prose, or should we focus on the difference between them? This article makes the case that there is a relationship between Milton’s use of the First Folio and the political prose, but one that has less to do with content or with Milton’s attitudes toward Shakespeare per se than with critical methods of reading. This relationship exemplifies the effect of polemicization on literary and textual criticism, as on every aspect of British culture, during the Civil Wars of the 1640s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
期刊最新文献
"To All Baptized": The Watery Dissent of Paradise Regained Milton's Second Marriage, the Burials of a Wife and Daughter, and Records from Two Parish Chests Milton and the Uses of Stupidity Milton after Auschwitz “Through a Glass, Darkly”: Paradise Lost and Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1