阿根廷医学教育工作者关于通用能力的观念:对建立共识的贡献

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Tuning Journal for Higher Education Pub Date : 2018-05-31 DOI:10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp99-132
R. Ladenheim, C. Hernández
{"title":"阿根廷医学教育工作者关于通用能力的观念:对建立共识的贡献","authors":"R. Ladenheim, C. Hernández","doi":"10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp99-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Healthcare professionals’ education is evolving to meet people’s needs towards a more comprehensive, collaborative and interdisciplinary training. In medical education in Argentina, in the context of international discussions around competence-based education (CBE), competence frameworks are being developed for undergraduate and postgraduate education, constituting agreed criteria that lead to the design of training programs and work as key tools to ensure educational quality. The Tuning Project and other international frameworks account for this process towards a common definition of standards beyond geographic and disciplinary boundaries. Generic competences (GCs) have acquired increased relevance in CBE discussions, whereas in medical education they involve key skills for patient safety – yet clarity in their implementation still has to be accomplished. In competence-based medical education (CBME), some changes are being hindered by the absence of a common language as well as diverging ideologies and theories. The purpose of this work was to explore conceptions and the terms used when referring to GCs by people in charge of educational planning and design of Human Resources (HR) training policies in Argentina. A qualitative informants from different levels and fields in medical education. Interviews were conducted by one interviewer and analysed by two independent researchers. Results showed that medical educational planners have different conceptions regarding GCs and fail to share a common language to enunciate them. They acknowledge their relevance for patient safety and agree with the notion that, at this time of educational transformation, it would be useful to enunciate them separately from specific competences, although they realise that this involves potential risks in curricular design. From all terms used in this regard, “generic competence” was identified as a contradiction in itself. Consensus on denomination, meaning and visibility in curricula is mandatory.Received: 26 April 2018Accepted: 18 May 2018Published online: 31 May 2018","PeriodicalId":53788,"journal":{"name":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Educators’ conceptions about Generic Competences in Argentina: Contributions for consensus building\",\"authors\":\"R. Ladenheim, C. Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp99-132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Healthcare professionals’ education is evolving to meet people’s needs towards a more comprehensive, collaborative and interdisciplinary training. In medical education in Argentina, in the context of international discussions around competence-based education (CBE), competence frameworks are being developed for undergraduate and postgraduate education, constituting agreed criteria that lead to the design of training programs and work as key tools to ensure educational quality. The Tuning Project and other international frameworks account for this process towards a common definition of standards beyond geographic and disciplinary boundaries. Generic competences (GCs) have acquired increased relevance in CBE discussions, whereas in medical education they involve key skills for patient safety – yet clarity in their implementation still has to be accomplished. In competence-based medical education (CBME), some changes are being hindered by the absence of a common language as well as diverging ideologies and theories. The purpose of this work was to explore conceptions and the terms used when referring to GCs by people in charge of educational planning and design of Human Resources (HR) training policies in Argentina. A qualitative informants from different levels and fields in medical education. Interviews were conducted by one interviewer and analysed by two independent researchers. Results showed that medical educational planners have different conceptions regarding GCs and fail to share a common language to enunciate them. They acknowledge their relevance for patient safety and agree with the notion that, at this time of educational transformation, it would be useful to enunciate them separately from specific competences, although they realise that this involves potential risks in curricular design. From all terms used in this regard, “generic competence” was identified as a contradiction in itself. Consensus on denomination, meaning and visibility in curricula is mandatory.Received: 26 April 2018Accepted: 18 May 2018Published online: 31 May 2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":53788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp99-132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp99-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

医疗保健专业人员的教育正在不断发展,以满足人们对更全面、协作和跨学科培训的需求。在阿根廷的医学教育方面,在国际上围绕能力教育进行讨论的背景下,正在为本科和研究生教育制定能力框架,构成商定的标准,指导培训方案的设计,并作为确保教育质量的关键工具。调优项目和其他国际框架解释了这一过程,以实现超越地理和学科界限的标准的共同定义。通用能力(GCs)在CBE讨论中获得了越来越多的相关性,而在医学教育中,它们涉及患者安全的关键技能——但它们的实施仍然需要明确。在以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)中,由于缺乏共同语言以及意识形态和理论的分歧,一些变化受到阻碍。这项工作的目的是探讨概念和术语时,由负责教育规划和设计人力资源(HR)培训政策在阿根廷的GCs使用。从医学教育的不同层次和领域进行定性信息源研究。访谈由一位采访者进行,并由两位独立研究人员进行分析。结果表明,医学教育规划人员对GCs有不同的概念,没有共同的语言来表达它们。他们承认他们与患者安全的相关性,并同意这样的观点,即在教育转型的这个时候,将他们与具体的能力分开阐述是有用的,尽管他们意识到这涉及到课程设计的潜在风险。从这方面使用的所有术语来看,“一般胜任能力”本身就是一个矛盾。在课程的名称、意义和可见度上达成共识是强制性的。收稿日期:2018年4月26日接收日期:2018年5月18日发布日期:2018年5月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Educators’ conceptions about Generic Competences in Argentina: Contributions for consensus building
Healthcare professionals’ education is evolving to meet people’s needs towards a more comprehensive, collaborative and interdisciplinary training. In medical education in Argentina, in the context of international discussions around competence-based education (CBE), competence frameworks are being developed for undergraduate and postgraduate education, constituting agreed criteria that lead to the design of training programs and work as key tools to ensure educational quality. The Tuning Project and other international frameworks account for this process towards a common definition of standards beyond geographic and disciplinary boundaries. Generic competences (GCs) have acquired increased relevance in CBE discussions, whereas in medical education they involve key skills for patient safety – yet clarity in their implementation still has to be accomplished. In competence-based medical education (CBME), some changes are being hindered by the absence of a common language as well as diverging ideologies and theories. The purpose of this work was to explore conceptions and the terms used when referring to GCs by people in charge of educational planning and design of Human Resources (HR) training policies in Argentina. A qualitative informants from different levels and fields in medical education. Interviews were conducted by one interviewer and analysed by two independent researchers. Results showed that medical educational planners have different conceptions regarding GCs and fail to share a common language to enunciate them. They acknowledge their relevance for patient safety and agree with the notion that, at this time of educational transformation, it would be useful to enunciate them separately from specific competences, although they realise that this involves potential risks in curricular design. From all terms used in this regard, “generic competence” was identified as a contradiction in itself. Consensus on denomination, meaning and visibility in curricula is mandatory.Received: 26 April 2018Accepted: 18 May 2018Published online: 31 May 2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Tuning Journal for Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Emerging strategies and challenges faced by professors during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) at a Colombian university The effects of online learning self-efficacy and attitude toward online learning in predicting academic performance: The case of online prospective mathematics teachers Teaching in a COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of university faculty in Spain The early years The impact of an active-learning designed faculty development program: A students’ perspective of an Italian university
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1