监管机构和环保组织:一起好还是分开好?

IF 2.2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Environment and Development Economics Pub Date : 2021-03-09 DOI:10.1017/S1355770X21000024
Ana Espínola‐Arredondo, E. Stathopoulou, Félix Muñoz-García
{"title":"监管机构和环保组织:一起好还是分开好?","authors":"Ana Espínola‐Arredondo, E. Stathopoulou, Félix Muñoz-García","doi":"10.1017/S1355770X21000024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines green alliances between environmental groups (EGs) and polluting firms, which have become more common in the last decades, and analyzes how they affect policy design. We first show that the activities of regulators and EGs are strategic substitutes, giving rise to free-riding incentives on both agents. Nonetheless, the presence of the EG yields smaller welfare benefits when firms are subject to regulation than when they are not. In addition, the introduction of environmental policy yields large welfare gains when the EG is absent but small benefits when the EG is already present.","PeriodicalId":47751,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Development Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"40 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1355770X21000024","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulators and environmental groups: better together or apart?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Espínola‐Arredondo, E. Stathopoulou, Félix Muñoz-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355770X21000024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper examines green alliances between environmental groups (EGs) and polluting firms, which have become more common in the last decades, and analyzes how they affect policy design. We first show that the activities of regulators and EGs are strategic substitutes, giving rise to free-riding incentives on both agents. Nonetheless, the presence of the EG yields smaller welfare benefits when firms are subject to regulation than when they are not. In addition, the introduction of environmental policy yields large welfare gains when the EG is absent but small benefits when the EG is already present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Development Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1355770X21000024\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Development Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X21000024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X21000024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文考察了近几十年来日益普遍的环境组织与污染企业之间的绿色联盟,并分析了它们对政策设计的影响。我们首先表明,监管机构和金融服务机构的活动是战略替代,对双方都产生了搭便车的激励。尽管如此,当企业受监管时,EG的存在所产生的福利要小于不受监管时。此外,环境政策的引入在环境目标不存在的情况下产生了巨大的福利收益,而在环境目标已经存在的情况下则产生了很小的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulators and environmental groups: better together or apart?
Abstract This paper examines green alliances between environmental groups (EGs) and polluting firms, which have become more common in the last decades, and analyzes how they affect policy design. We first show that the activities of regulators and EGs are strategic substitutes, giving rise to free-riding incentives on both agents. Nonetheless, the presence of the EG yields smaller welfare benefits when firms are subject to regulation than when they are not. In addition, the introduction of environmental policy yields large welfare gains when the EG is absent but small benefits when the EG is already present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Environment and Development Economics is positioned at the intersection of environmental, resource and development economics. The Editor and Associate Editors, supported by a distinguished panel of advisors from around the world, aim to encourage submissions from researchers in the field in both developed and developing countries. The Journal is divided into two main sections, Theory and Applications, which includes regular academic papers and Policy Options, which includes papers that may be of interest to the wider policy community. Environment and Development Economics also publishes occasional Policy Fora (discussions based on a focal paper). From time to time the journal publishes special issues based on a particular theme.
期刊最新文献
A New Approach to Modeling the Cure Rate in the Presence of Interval Censored Data. Trade liberalization and the choice of pollution abatement Institutions' quality and environmental pollution in Africa With or without the European Union: the convention for the protection of the Black Sea against pollution Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1