政治幻影:亚里士多德关于想象与集体行动

IF 5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Journal of Political Science Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1111/ajps.12744
Avshalom M. Schwartz
{"title":"政治幻影:亚里士多德关于想象与集体行动","authors":"Avshalom M. Schwartz","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article provides a new account of the role of <i>phantasia</i>, imagination, in Aristotle's political thought. <i>Phantasia</i> plays a key role in Aristotle's psychology and is crucial for explaining any kind of movement and action. I argue that this insight holds for collective actions as well. By offering a reconsideration of the famous “Wisdom of the Multitude” passage, this article shows that the capacity of a multitude to act together is tied to its ability to share a collective <i>phantasma</i>: a mental representation of the practical end or goal of their collective effort as good and thus worthy of pursuit. However, I argue that given the subjective nature of <i>phantasia</i>, acting together can be hard. I conclude that since one's <i>phantasia</i> is shaped by one's moral character, a community can achieve a shared <i>phantasma—</i>and thus secure collective action—by means of persuasion, habituation, and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":48447,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Political Science","volume":"68 3","pages":"861-873"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Phantasies: Aristotle on Imagination and Collective Action\",\"authors\":\"Avshalom M. Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajps.12744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article provides a new account of the role of <i>phantasia</i>, imagination, in Aristotle's political thought. <i>Phantasia</i> plays a key role in Aristotle's psychology and is crucial for explaining any kind of movement and action. I argue that this insight holds for collective actions as well. By offering a reconsideration of the famous “Wisdom of the Multitude” passage, this article shows that the capacity of a multitude to act together is tied to its ability to share a collective <i>phantasma</i>: a mental representation of the practical end or goal of their collective effort as good and thus worthy of pursuit. However, I argue that given the subjective nature of <i>phantasia</i>, acting together can be hard. I conclude that since one's <i>phantasia</i> is shaped by one's moral character, a community can achieve a shared <i>phantasma—</i>and thus secure collective action—by means of persuasion, habituation, and education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"861-873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对幻觉(想象力)在亚里士多德政治思想中的作用进行了新的阐述。幻觉在亚里士多德的心理学中起着关键作用,对于解释任何运动和行动都至关重要。我认为,这一观点同样适用于集体行动。通过对著名的 "众人的智慧 "这段话的重新思考,本文表明,众人共同行动的能力与他们共享集体幻象的能力息息相关:他们对集体努力的实际目的或目标的心理表征是好的,因而值得追求。然而,我认为,鉴于幻象的主观性,共同行动可能很难。我的结论是,由于一个人的幻觉是由其道德品质决定的,因此一个群体可以通过说服、习惯化和教育等手段实现共同的幻觉,从而确保集体行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Phantasies: Aristotle on Imagination and Collective Action

This article provides a new account of the role of phantasia, imagination, in Aristotle's political thought. Phantasia plays a key role in Aristotle's psychology and is crucial for explaining any kind of movement and action. I argue that this insight holds for collective actions as well. By offering a reconsideration of the famous “Wisdom of the Multitude” passage, this article shows that the capacity of a multitude to act together is tied to its ability to share a collective phantasma: a mental representation of the practical end or goal of their collective effort as good and thus worthy of pursuit. However, I argue that given the subjective nature of phantasia, acting together can be hard. I conclude that since one's phantasia is shaped by one's moral character, a community can achieve a shared phantasma—and thus secure collective action—by means of persuasion, habituation, and education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) publishes research in all major areas of political science including American politics, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political methodology, and political theory. Founded in 1956, the AJPS publishes articles that make outstanding contributions to scholarly knowledge about notable theoretical concerns, puzzles or controversies in any subfield of political science.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to Skill specificity and attitudes toward immigration Issue Information Issue Information - Table of Contents Unsubscribed and undemanding: Partisanship and the minimal effects of a field experiment encouraging local news consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1