音乐技术和AirPods:将Theodor Adorno视为媒体生态学家

Q2 Social Sciences Explorations in Media Ecology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1386/eme_00132_1
S. Church, Audrey Halversen, Brent Yergensen
{"title":"音乐技术和AirPods:将Theodor Adorno视为媒体生态学家","authors":"S. Church, Audrey Halversen, Brent Yergensen","doi":"10.1386/eme_00132_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When new technologies emerge, they inevitably bring to mind many of the same questions that media scholars have been asking for decades. In this study, we will analyse Apple AirPods through a theoretical framework based in the writings of media ecologists like Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman, as well as media theorist Theodor W. Adorno. Adorno is included here because very few articles in media ecology scholarship discuss his contributions to media research. The exclusion of Adorno from media ecology appears to relate to his different ontological assumptions about media. While Innis, McLuhan and Postman contribute to the ‘structures and patterns narrative’ of medium theory, Adorno clearly fits into the ‘power and resistance narrative’ of critical/cultural studies. However, there are more significant connections between Adorno and the field of media ecology than have been previously acknowledged. In particular, there is a confluence between Adorno’s writings and others by media ecology scholars like Postman and Lewis Mumford, particularly in Adorno’s arguments about technology and music. In this article, we consider the question: can Adorno’s writings on technology be considered appropriate for inclusion in the media ecology canon? In this article, we will explore representative essays from Adorno’s extensive body of work on music reproduction technologies and discuss the parallels between his arguments and those made by others in media ecology.","PeriodicalId":36155,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Media Ecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music technologies and AirPods: Considering Theodor Adorno as media ecologist\",\"authors\":\"S. Church, Audrey Halversen, Brent Yergensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/eme_00132_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When new technologies emerge, they inevitably bring to mind many of the same questions that media scholars have been asking for decades. In this study, we will analyse Apple AirPods through a theoretical framework based in the writings of media ecologists like Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman, as well as media theorist Theodor W. Adorno. Adorno is included here because very few articles in media ecology scholarship discuss his contributions to media research. The exclusion of Adorno from media ecology appears to relate to his different ontological assumptions about media. While Innis, McLuhan and Postman contribute to the ‘structures and patterns narrative’ of medium theory, Adorno clearly fits into the ‘power and resistance narrative’ of critical/cultural studies. However, there are more significant connections between Adorno and the field of media ecology than have been previously acknowledged. In particular, there is a confluence between Adorno’s writings and others by media ecology scholars like Postman and Lewis Mumford, particularly in Adorno’s arguments about technology and music. In this article, we consider the question: can Adorno’s writings on technology be considered appropriate for inclusion in the media ecology canon? In this article, we will explore representative essays from Adorno’s extensive body of work on music reproduction technologies and discuss the parallels between his arguments and those made by others in media ecology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explorations in Media Ecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explorations in Media Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00132_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Media Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00132_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当新技术出现时,它们不可避免地会让人想起许多媒体学者几十年来一直在问的问题。在本研究中,我们将通过基于媒体生态学家如Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan和Neil Postman以及媒体理论家Theodor W. Adorno的著作的理论框架来分析Apple AirPods。这里包括阿多诺,因为在媒体生态学研究中很少有文章讨论他对媒体研究的贡献。将阿多诺排除在媒介生态学之外,似乎与他对媒介的不同本体论假设有关。英尼斯、麦克卢汉和波兹曼为媒介理论的“结构和模式叙事”做出了贡献,而阿多诺显然符合批判/文化研究的“权力和抵抗叙事”。然而,阿多诺与媒介生态领域之间的联系比之前所承认的更为重要。特别是,阿多诺的著作与波兹曼(Postman)和刘易斯·芒福德(Lewis Mumford)等媒体生态学学者的著作有一处相通之处,尤其是阿多诺关于技术和音乐的观点。在这篇文章中,我们思考这样一个问题:阿多诺关于技术的著作是否适合被纳入媒介生态学经典?在这篇文章中,我们将探索阿多诺关于音乐复制技术的大量作品中的代表性文章,并讨论他的论点与媒体生态学中其他人的论点之间的相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Music technologies and AirPods: Considering Theodor Adorno as media ecologist
When new technologies emerge, they inevitably bring to mind many of the same questions that media scholars have been asking for decades. In this study, we will analyse Apple AirPods through a theoretical framework based in the writings of media ecologists like Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman, as well as media theorist Theodor W. Adorno. Adorno is included here because very few articles in media ecology scholarship discuss his contributions to media research. The exclusion of Adorno from media ecology appears to relate to his different ontological assumptions about media. While Innis, McLuhan and Postman contribute to the ‘structures and patterns narrative’ of medium theory, Adorno clearly fits into the ‘power and resistance narrative’ of critical/cultural studies. However, there are more significant connections between Adorno and the field of media ecology than have been previously acknowledged. In particular, there is a confluence between Adorno’s writings and others by media ecology scholars like Postman and Lewis Mumford, particularly in Adorno’s arguments about technology and music. In this article, we consider the question: can Adorno’s writings on technology be considered appropriate for inclusion in the media ecology canon? In this article, we will explore representative essays from Adorno’s extensive body of work on music reproduction technologies and discuss the parallels between his arguments and those made by others in media ecology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Explorations in Media Ecology
Explorations in Media Ecology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Strike and tangle: Crowd control in the digital media environment Enactive approach to social interactions in religious media ecologies From ‘Copy Left’ Story and Structure: A Complete Guide, Leon Conrad (2022) ‘I am big. It’s the pictures that got small’: A look at Sunset Boulevard through Marshall McLuhan’s theory of hot and cool media and personalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1