使健康数据能够用于研究:为南非的研究制定持久性有机污染物信息倡议行为守则

C. Staunton, R. Adams, M. Botes, J. D. Vries, M. Labuschaigne, G. Loots, S. Mahomed, N. N. Loideáin, A. Olckers, M. Pepper, A. Pope, Michéle Ramsay
{"title":"使健康数据能够用于研究:为南非的研究制定持久性有机污染物信息倡议行为守则","authors":"C. Staunton, R. Adams, M. Botes, J. D. Vries, M. Labuschaigne, G. Loots, S. Mahomed, N. N. Loideáin, A. Olckers, M. Pepper, A. Pope, Michéle Ramsay","doi":"10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I1.00740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, there has been a move toward ‘open science’ that includes the sharing of health data for research. The importance of data sharing for research is generally acknowledged, but this must only be done with legal and ethical procedures and protections in place. The use and sharing of health data for research in South Africa has changed with the coming into force of the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). POPIA should ensure greater transparency and accountability in the use of personal information. POPIA, however, adopts a principle-based approach to the regulation of personal information, and there is a lack of clarity and uncertainty in the application of some of these principles to the use of health data for research. POPIA provides for sector-specific responses through the development of codes of conduct. In this article, we discuss the need for a code of conduct for health research, and an approach that could be adopted in its development.","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling the use of health data for research: Developing a POPIA code of conduct for research in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"C. Staunton, R. Adams, M. Botes, J. D. Vries, M. Labuschaigne, G. Loots, S. Mahomed, N. N. Loideáin, A. Olckers, M. Pepper, A. Pope, Michéle Ramsay\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I1.00740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Globally, there has been a move toward ‘open science’ that includes the sharing of health data for research. The importance of data sharing for research is generally acknowledged, but this must only be done with legal and ethical procedures and protections in place. The use and sharing of health data for research in South Africa has changed with the coming into force of the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). POPIA should ensure greater transparency and accountability in the use of personal information. POPIA, however, adopts a principle-based approach to the regulation of personal information, and there is a lack of clarity and uncertainty in the application of some of these principles to the use of health data for research. POPIA provides for sector-specific responses through the development of codes of conduct. In this article, we discuss the need for a code of conduct for health research, and an approach that could be adopted in its development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I1.00740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I1.00740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在全球范围内,已经出现了一种“开放科学”的趋势,其中包括共享用于研究的卫生数据。数据共享对研究的重要性得到普遍承认,但这必须在法律和道德程序和保护措施到位的情况下完成。随着《个人信息保护法》(POPIA)的生效,南非为研究使用和共享健康数据的情况发生了变化。POPIA应确保在使用个人信息方面提高透明度和问责制。然而,《人口信息法》对个人信息的管理采取了一种基于原则的办法,在将其中一些原则应用于使用健康数据进行研究方面缺乏明确性和不确定性。POPIA通过制定行为守则规定了针对特定部门的对策。在本文中,我们讨论了制定卫生研究行为准则的必要性,以及在制定过程中可以采用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enabling the use of health data for research: Developing a POPIA code of conduct for research in South Africa
Globally, there has been a move toward ‘open science’ that includes the sharing of health data for research. The importance of data sharing for research is generally acknowledged, but this must only be done with legal and ethical procedures and protections in place. The use and sharing of health data for research in South Africa has changed with the coming into force of the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA). POPIA should ensure greater transparency and accountability in the use of personal information. POPIA, however, adopts a principle-based approach to the regulation of personal information, and there is a lack of clarity and uncertainty in the application of some of these principles to the use of health data for research. POPIA provides for sector-specific responses through the development of codes of conduct. In this article, we discuss the need for a code of conduct for health research, and an approach that could be adopted in its development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Stellenbosch University Senate ought to remain neutral on the Israel-Palestine war in Gaza - A response to Mahomed and Hendricks A response to 'The Stellenbosch University Senate ought to remain neutral on the Israel-Palestine war in Gaza - A response to Mahomed and Hendricks' International humanitarian law: Dunant would be devastated again Organ donation after circulatory death – legal in South Africa and in alignment with Chapter 8 of the National Health Act and Regulations relating to organ and tissue donation The noble cause of medicine – fact or fallacy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1