Ya Li, Lingling Jiao, Naishi Li, Zhenjie Wang, Hong Jiang, K. Yu
{"title":"健康检查反馈方式(HCFS)对75岁及以上2型糖尿病患者血糖和体重的影响:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Ya Li, Lingling Jiao, Naishi Li, Zhenjie Wang, Hong Jiang, K. Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the effect of health check-up feedback style (HCFS) on the blood glucose level and weight of type 2 diabetes patients aged 75 years and older. \n \n \nMethods \n120 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes and aged 75 and older who were taking annual health check-up and receiving paper-based medical examination reports at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled into this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (control group and study group). All patients received annual health check-up between November 2014 and October 2015 (baseline health check-up). Patients in control group were given paper-based feedback as usual, while those in study group received feedback via face-to-face or telephone conversations. All patients received their second annual health check-up between November 2015 and October 2016. The patients' blood glucose and weight at the second health check-up were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nIn baseline health check-up, the levels of HbA1c and BMI showed no difference between the two groups. In the second health check-up, HbA1c and BMI of study group were lower than control group[(7.17±0.58)% vs. (7.44±0.72)%, P=0.027; (24.3±3.8)kg/m2vs. (25.0±4.2)kg/m2,P=0.049]. Fast blood glucose and waist circumference showed no difference between the two groups. \n \n \nConclusions \nCombination of paper-based reports and face-to-face or telephone conversations to feedback on health check-up results led to better blood glucose and BMI control in old aged type 2 diabetes patients. HCFS is of vital importance. \n \n \nKey words: \nDiabetes mellitus, type 2; Blood glucose; Body weight; Health check-up","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"74-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of health check-up feedback style (HCFS) on blood glucose and weight in type 2 diabetes patients aged 75 years and older: a randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Ya Li, Lingling Jiao, Naishi Li, Zhenjie Wang, Hong Jiang, K. Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo analyze the effect of health check-up feedback style (HCFS) on the blood glucose level and weight of type 2 diabetes patients aged 75 years and older. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\n120 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes and aged 75 and older who were taking annual health check-up and receiving paper-based medical examination reports at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled into this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (control group and study group). All patients received annual health check-up between November 2014 and October 2015 (baseline health check-up). Patients in control group were given paper-based feedback as usual, while those in study group received feedback via face-to-face or telephone conversations. All patients received their second annual health check-up between November 2015 and October 2016. The patients' blood glucose and weight at the second health check-up were compared between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nIn baseline health check-up, the levels of HbA1c and BMI showed no difference between the two groups. In the second health check-up, HbA1c and BMI of study group were lower than control group[(7.17±0.58)% vs. (7.44±0.72)%, P=0.027; (24.3±3.8)kg/m2vs. (25.0±4.2)kg/m2,P=0.049]. Fast blood glucose and waist circumference showed no difference between the two groups. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nCombination of paper-based reports and face-to-face or telephone conversations to feedback on health check-up results led to better blood glucose and BMI control in old aged type 2 diabetes patients. HCFS is of vital importance. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDiabetes mellitus, type 2; Blood glucose; Body weight; Health check-up\",\"PeriodicalId\":9877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"74-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of health check-up feedback style (HCFS) on blood glucose and weight in type 2 diabetes patients aged 75 years and older: a randomized controlled study
Objective
To analyze the effect of health check-up feedback style (HCFS) on the blood glucose level and weight of type 2 diabetes patients aged 75 years and older.
Methods
120 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes and aged 75 and older who were taking annual health check-up and receiving paper-based medical examination reports at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled into this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (control group and study group). All patients received annual health check-up between November 2014 and October 2015 (baseline health check-up). Patients in control group were given paper-based feedback as usual, while those in study group received feedback via face-to-face or telephone conversations. All patients received their second annual health check-up between November 2015 and October 2016. The patients' blood glucose and weight at the second health check-up were compared between the two groups.
Results
In baseline health check-up, the levels of HbA1c and BMI showed no difference between the two groups. In the second health check-up, HbA1c and BMI of study group were lower than control group[(7.17±0.58)% vs. (7.44±0.72)%, P=0.027; (24.3±3.8)kg/m2vs. (25.0±4.2)kg/m2,P=0.049]. Fast blood glucose and waist circumference showed no difference between the two groups.
Conclusions
Combination of paper-based reports and face-to-face or telephone conversations to feedback on health check-up results led to better blood glucose and BMI control in old aged type 2 diabetes patients. HCFS is of vital importance.
Key words:
Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Blood glucose; Body weight; Health check-up
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch.
The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.