关于创造就业的综合法案:国家控制?

Siska Ambarwati
{"title":"关于创造就业的综合法案:国家控制?","authors":"Siska Ambarwati","doi":"10.18196/JMH.V28I1.10654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to analyze whether there is a state capture in making the Job Creation Law. Since the Job Creation Law was raised, many parties have criticized the existence of the Law because in the making of the Job Creation Law it is believed that it is more beneficial to employers, giving rise to an indication of state capture in its making. The research method used is a form of normative research with a statutory approach. The result shows that there is a state capture carried out by the authorities and employers in the making of the Job Creation Law. About 262 or 45.5 percent of the 575 House of Representatives members are affiliated with the company and therefore the regulations to be made more favorable for employers or investors while the welfare of workers is at stake. The rushed legislative process causes the values and aspirations of the people to be unable to be proportionally aggregated and accommodated, and this is certainly contrary to the principle of participation and the principle of openness as stipulated in the provisions of laws and regulations.","PeriodicalId":53118,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Media Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omnibus Law on Job Creation: State Capture?\",\"authors\":\"Siska Ambarwati\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/JMH.V28I1.10654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to analyze whether there is a state capture in making the Job Creation Law. Since the Job Creation Law was raised, many parties have criticized the existence of the Law because in the making of the Job Creation Law it is believed that it is more beneficial to employers, giving rise to an indication of state capture in its making. The research method used is a form of normative research with a statutory approach. The result shows that there is a state capture carried out by the authorities and employers in the making of the Job Creation Law. About 262 or 45.5 percent of the 575 House of Representatives members are affiliated with the company and therefore the regulations to be made more favorable for employers or investors while the welfare of workers is at stake. The rushed legislative process causes the values and aspirations of the people to be unable to be proportionally aggregated and accommodated, and this is certainly contrary to the principle of participation and the principle of openness as stipulated in the provisions of laws and regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Media Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V28I1.10654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Media Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V28I1.10654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在分析在制定《创造就业法》时是否存在国家俘获。自从《创造就业法》提出以来,许多党派都批评该法的存在,因为在制定《创造就业法案》时,人们认为它对雇主更有利,这表明它的制定过程中有国家俘获的迹象。所使用的研究方法是一种具有法定方法的规范性研究形式。结果表明,在《创造就业法》的制定过程中,当局和雇主进行了国家捕获。575名众议院议员中,约262人(45.5%)隶属于该公司,因此,在事关工人福利的情况下,这些规定将对雇主或投资者更加有利。仓促的立法程序导致人民的价值观和愿望无法按比例聚合和容纳,这当然违背了法律法规规定的参与原则和公开原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Omnibus Law on Job Creation: State Capture?
The study aims to analyze whether there is a state capture in making the Job Creation Law. Since the Job Creation Law was raised, many parties have criticized the existence of the Law because in the making of the Job Creation Law it is believed that it is more beneficial to employers, giving rise to an indication of state capture in its making. The research method used is a form of normative research with a statutory approach. The result shows that there is a state capture carried out by the authorities and employers in the making of the Job Creation Law. About 262 or 45.5 percent of the 575 House of Representatives members are affiliated with the company and therefore the regulations to be made more favorable for employers or investors while the welfare of workers is at stake. The rushed legislative process causes the values and aspirations of the people to be unable to be proportionally aggregated and accommodated, and this is certainly contrary to the principle of participation and the principle of openness as stipulated in the provisions of laws and regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Reintegration after the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Code Kerangka Penyusunan Produk Hukum Daerah Berbasis Pada Kekhususan Dan Keberagaman Daerah Kedudukan Wakil Kepala Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang No.23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Revitalisasi Hukum Islam Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia Peran Mahasiswa Dalam Mencegah Politik Uang Dan Kecurangan Pemilu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1