火花等离子烧结(SPS)制备生物玻璃和生物陶瓷复合材料:生物评价与SBF试验

Q1 Materials Science Biomedical Glasses Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI:10.1515/bglass-2018-0003
D. Bellucci, R. Salvatori, M. Cannio, M. Luginina, R. Orrú, Selena Montinaro, A. Anesi, L. Chiarini, G. Cao, V. Cannillo
{"title":"火花等离子烧结(SPS)制备生物玻璃和生物陶瓷复合材料:生物评价与SBF试验","authors":"D. Bellucci, R. Salvatori, M. Cannio, M. Luginina, R. Orrú, Selena Montinaro, A. Anesi, L. Chiarini, G. Cao, V. Cannillo","doi":"10.1515/bglass-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite (HA), a lab-made bioglass (BGCaMIX) with high crystallization temperature and different HA/BGCaMIX composites, produced by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS), was tested with respect to murine osteocytes both by direct and indirect tests, in order to also investigate possible cytotoxic effects of the samples’ extracts. Previous investigations demonstrated that the samples’ bioactivity, evaluated in a simulated body fluid solution (SBF), increased with the increasing amount of BGCaMIX in the sample itself. Although none of the samples were cytotoxic, the findings of the biological evaluation did not confirm those arising from the SBF assay. In particular, the results of direct tests did not show an enhanced “biological performance” of materials with higher glass content. This finding may be due to the high release of ions and particulate from the glass phase. On the contrary, the performance of the BGCaMIX alone is better for the indirect tests, based on filtered samples’ extracts. This work further demonstrates that, when considering bioglasses and HA/bioglass composites, the results of the SBF assays should be interpreted with great care, making sure that the results arising from direct contact tests are integrated with those arising fromthe indirect ones.","PeriodicalId":37354,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Glasses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/bglass-2018-0003","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioglass and bioceramic composites processed by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): biological evaluation Versus SBF test\",\"authors\":\"D. Bellucci, R. Salvatori, M. Cannio, M. Luginina, R. Orrú, Selena Montinaro, A. Anesi, L. Chiarini, G. Cao, V. Cannillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bglass-2018-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite (HA), a lab-made bioglass (BGCaMIX) with high crystallization temperature and different HA/BGCaMIX composites, produced by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS), was tested with respect to murine osteocytes both by direct and indirect tests, in order to also investigate possible cytotoxic effects of the samples’ extracts. Previous investigations demonstrated that the samples’ bioactivity, evaluated in a simulated body fluid solution (SBF), increased with the increasing amount of BGCaMIX in the sample itself. Although none of the samples were cytotoxic, the findings of the biological evaluation did not confirm those arising from the SBF assay. In particular, the results of direct tests did not show an enhanced “biological performance” of materials with higher glass content. This finding may be due to the high release of ions and particulate from the glass phase. On the contrary, the performance of the BGCaMIX alone is better for the indirect tests, based on filtered samples’ extracts. This work further demonstrates that, when considering bioglasses and HA/bioglass composites, the results of the SBF assays should be interpreted with great care, making sure that the results arising from direct contact tests are integrated with those arising fromthe indirect ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Glasses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/bglass-2018-0003\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Glasses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2018-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Glasses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要:采用火花等离子烧结(SPS)法制备的高结晶温度生物玻璃羟基磷灰石(HA)和不同的HA/BGCaMIX复合材料,通过直接和间接两种方法对羟基磷灰石(HA)与小鼠骨细胞的生物相容性进行了测试,并探讨了样品提取物可能的细胞毒性作用。先前的研究表明,在模拟体液溶液(SBF)中评估的样品的生物活性随着样品本身中BGCaMIX含量的增加而增加。虽然没有样品具有细胞毒性,但生物学评价的结果并没有证实SBF试验产生的结果。特别是,直接测试的结果并未显示玻璃含量较高的材料的"生物性能"得到增强。这一发现可能是由于离子和颗粒从玻璃相大量释放。相反,单独使用BGCaMIX进行基于过滤样品提取物的间接测试的性能更好。这项工作进一步表明,在考虑生物玻璃和透明质酸/生物玻璃复合材料时,应非常小心地解释SBF测定的结果,确保直接接触试验的结果与间接接触试验的结果相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bioglass and bioceramic composites processed by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): biological evaluation Versus SBF test
Abstract The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite (HA), a lab-made bioglass (BGCaMIX) with high crystallization temperature and different HA/BGCaMIX composites, produced by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS), was tested with respect to murine osteocytes both by direct and indirect tests, in order to also investigate possible cytotoxic effects of the samples’ extracts. Previous investigations demonstrated that the samples’ bioactivity, evaluated in a simulated body fluid solution (SBF), increased with the increasing amount of BGCaMIX in the sample itself. Although none of the samples were cytotoxic, the findings of the biological evaluation did not confirm those arising from the SBF assay. In particular, the results of direct tests did not show an enhanced “biological performance” of materials with higher glass content. This finding may be due to the high release of ions and particulate from the glass phase. On the contrary, the performance of the BGCaMIX alone is better for the indirect tests, based on filtered samples’ extracts. This work further demonstrates that, when considering bioglasses and HA/bioglass composites, the results of the SBF assays should be interpreted with great care, making sure that the results arising from direct contact tests are integrated with those arising fromthe indirect ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Glasses
Biomedical Glasses Materials Science-Surfaces, Coatings and Films
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Glasses is an international Open Access-only journal covering the field of glasses for biomedical applications. The scope of the journal covers the science and technology of glasses and glass-based materials intended for applications in medicine and dentistry. It includes: Chemistry, physics, structure, design and characterization of biomedical glasses Surface science and interactions of biomedical glasses with aqueous and biological media Modeling structure and reactivity of biomedical glasses and their interfaces Biocompatibility of biomedical glasses Processing of biomedical glasses to achieve specific forms and functionality Biomedical glass coatings and composites In vitro and in vivo evaluation of biomedical glasses Glasses and glass-ceramics in engineered regeneration of tissues and organs Glass-based devices for medical and dental applications Application of glasses and glass-ceramics in healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/multicomponent bioactive glass scaffolds for potential application in bone tissue engineering Novel borosilicate bioactive scaffolds with persistent luminescence Modelling the elastic mechanical properties of bioactive glass-derived scaffolds Tantalum doped SiO2-CaO-P2O5 based bioactive glasses: Investigation of in vitro bioactivity and antibacterial activities Yttrium doped phosphate-based glasses: structural and degradation analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1