“纳塔尔”橙树杂草综合防治方法

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Cientifica Pub Date : 2021-09-29 DOI:10.15361/1984-5529.2021v49n3p128-136
Leandro Vidotti Vila Real, N. Neto, Cecilia Giolo Favaro, P. Alves
{"title":"“纳塔尔”橙树杂草综合防治方法","authors":"Leandro Vidotti Vila Real, N. Neto, Cecilia Giolo Favaro, P. Alves","doi":"10.15361/1984-5529.2021v49n3p128-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main critical points in the production process of orange trees is the negative interference imposed by weeds. Considering the relevance of this factor, this study aims to evaluate integrated methods for weed control on the yield of orange ( Citrus sinensis L.), cv. ‘Natal’. A field experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with the following nine treatments: manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with herbicide; herbicide application in the total area; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean ( Canavalia ensiformis L.) between the rows; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of the legume in the total area; herbicide application between the rows only in the free space between canopies; herbicide application in the row; herbicide application in the canopy projection; herbicide application in the total area except for the canopy projection; besides a control treatment, without weeding. The herbicide used was glyphosate, always applied at a dose of 1,080 g ha -1 . Among the studied managements, it can be concluded that the manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with glyphosate (1,080 g ha -1 ); glyphosate application in the total area; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean between the rows; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack beans in the total area; and glyphosate application in the canopy projection resulted in the same yield as the traditional management adopted by the farmer, which consists of glyphosate application in the row. On the other hand, glyphosate application in the total area except for the canopy projection and glyphosate application between the rows only in the free space between canopies were not good weed control methods, resulting in lower yield, whose value was similar to that of the control without weeding (in the bush).","PeriodicalId":35044,"journal":{"name":"Cientifica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated methods for weed control in the 'Natal' orange tree\",\"authors\":\"Leandro Vidotti Vila Real, N. Neto, Cecilia Giolo Favaro, P. Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.15361/1984-5529.2021v49n3p128-136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main critical points in the production process of orange trees is the negative interference imposed by weeds. Considering the relevance of this factor, this study aims to evaluate integrated methods for weed control on the yield of orange ( Citrus sinensis L.), cv. ‘Natal’. A field experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with the following nine treatments: manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with herbicide; herbicide application in the total area; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean ( Canavalia ensiformis L.) between the rows; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of the legume in the total area; herbicide application between the rows only in the free space between canopies; herbicide application in the row; herbicide application in the canopy projection; herbicide application in the total area except for the canopy projection; besides a control treatment, without weeding. The herbicide used was glyphosate, always applied at a dose of 1,080 g ha -1 . Among the studied managements, it can be concluded that the manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with glyphosate (1,080 g ha -1 ); glyphosate application in the total area; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean between the rows; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack beans in the total area; and glyphosate application in the canopy projection resulted in the same yield as the traditional management adopted by the farmer, which consists of glyphosate application in the row. On the other hand, glyphosate application in the total area except for the canopy projection and glyphosate application between the rows only in the free space between canopies were not good weed control methods, resulting in lower yield, whose value was similar to that of the control without weeding (in the bush).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cientifica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cientifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2021v49n3p128-136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2021v49n3p128-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桔子树生产过程中的一个主要关键点是杂草的负面干扰。考虑到这一因素的相关性,本研究旨在评估综合除草方法对‘纳塔尔’柑桔产量的影响。采用随机区组设计,采用以下九种处理方法进行了田间试验:对与除草剂维持相关的区域进行人工除草;除草剂在总面积的施用;在总面积上施用除草剂,然后在各行之间播种蚕豆(Canavalia ensiformis L.);在总面积施用除草剂,然后在总面积播种豆类;仅在树冠之间的自由空间中在行之间施用除草剂;行内施用除草剂;除草剂在冠层投影中的应用;在除树冠投影以外的总面积内施用除草剂;除对照处理外,不除草。所使用的除草剂是草甘膦,通常以1080克公顷-1的剂量施用。在所研究的管理中,可以得出结论:与草甘膦(1080 g ha-1)维护相关的区域的人工除草;草甘膦在总面积的应用;在总面积施用草甘膦,然后在各行之间播种蚕豆;在总面积施用草甘膦,然后在总面积播种蚕豆;在冠层投影中施用草甘膦与农民采用的传统管理(即在行中施用草甘膦)产生相同的产量。另一方面,除冠层投影外的总面积施用草甘膦和仅在冠层之间的自由空间在行间施用草甘膦不是很好的杂草控制方法,导致产量较低,其值与未除草的对照(灌木中)相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated methods for weed control in the 'Natal' orange tree
One of the main critical points in the production process of orange trees is the negative interference imposed by weeds. Considering the relevance of this factor, this study aims to evaluate integrated methods for weed control on the yield of orange ( Citrus sinensis L.), cv. ‘Natal’. A field experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with the following nine treatments: manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with herbicide; herbicide application in the total area; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean ( Canavalia ensiformis L.) between the rows; herbicide application in the total area followed by sowing of the legume in the total area; herbicide application between the rows only in the free space between canopies; herbicide application in the row; herbicide application in the canopy projection; herbicide application in the total area except for the canopy projection; besides a control treatment, without weeding. The herbicide used was glyphosate, always applied at a dose of 1,080 g ha -1 . Among the studied managements, it can be concluded that the manual weeding of the area associated with maintenance with glyphosate (1,080 g ha -1 ); glyphosate application in the total area; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack bean between the rows; glyphosate application in the total area followed by sowing of jack beans in the total area; and glyphosate application in the canopy projection resulted in the same yield as the traditional management adopted by the farmer, which consists of glyphosate application in the row. On the other hand, glyphosate application in the total area except for the canopy projection and glyphosate application between the rows only in the free space between canopies were not good weed control methods, resulting in lower yield, whose value was similar to that of the control without weeding (in the bush).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cientifica
Cientifica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Eucalyptus citriodora, E. phaeotricha and E. propinqua seeds subjected to classification by sieves Use of bioinsecticide and sugarcane molasses in the management of Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) and Metamasius spp. (Horn) Spray nozzles and curtain of chains in fungicide application to control Asian soybean rust Desordens nutricionais provocadas por deficiência e excesso de zinco em plantas de milho Efeito da bagana de carnaúba nos atributos microbiológicos, umidade e temperatura do solo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1