将弗里德里希·拉策尔的政治和生物地理学应用于意大利自然边界的辩论(1880-1920)

Q2 Social Sciences Geographica Helvetica Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.5194/gh-78-41-2023
Matteo Proto
{"title":"将弗里德里希·拉策尔的政治和生物地理学应用于意大利自然边界的辩论(1880-1920)","authors":"Matteo Proto","doi":"10.5194/gh-78-41-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This paper examines the contribution of Italian academic geography to the processes of nation-building between ca. 1880–1920. With reference to Friedrich Ratzel's works, it explores the ways in which biological and vitalist theories shaped political processes. In the decades between Italy's national unification until the first post-war period, Italian academic geographers helped to consolidate the nation-state by means of theoretical reflection, applied research, and education. The main focus of geographers was in defining the national space and its boundaries, especially by developing a scientific analysis that could establish the\nexact position of the terrestrial border along the Alpine chain. The\nscientific topic was strongly connected with the nationalist question of\nirredenta, which garnered growing consideration in the last 2 decades of\nthe 19th century. The epistemological turn in Italian geography was\nparticularly influenced by new approaches in German geography introduced by\nscholars such as Oscar Peschel and Friedrich Ratzel and aimed to formulate a general understanding of biogeography in its relationship with the earth's physical space. The reception of this theoretical model in the political debate and the way it was applied in the following decades proved highly significant.\n","PeriodicalId":35649,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Friedrich Ratzel's political and biogeography to the debate on natural borders in the Italian context (1880–1920)\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Proto\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gh-78-41-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This paper examines the contribution of Italian academic geography to the processes of nation-building between ca. 1880–1920. With reference to Friedrich Ratzel's works, it explores the ways in which biological and vitalist theories shaped political processes. In the decades between Italy's national unification until the first post-war period, Italian academic geographers helped to consolidate the nation-state by means of theoretical reflection, applied research, and education. The main focus of geographers was in defining the national space and its boundaries, especially by developing a scientific analysis that could establish the\\nexact position of the terrestrial border along the Alpine chain. The\\nscientific topic was strongly connected with the nationalist question of\\nirredenta, which garnered growing consideration in the last 2 decades of\\nthe 19th century. The epistemological turn in Italian geography was\\nparticularly influenced by new approaches in German geography introduced by\\nscholars such as Oscar Peschel and Friedrich Ratzel and aimed to formulate a general understanding of biogeography in its relationship with the earth's physical space. The reception of this theoretical model in the political debate and the way it was applied in the following decades proved highly significant.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-41-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-41-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了约1880-1920年间意大利学术地理学对国家建设进程的贡献。参考弗里德里希·拉策尔的作品,探讨了生物学和生命主义理论塑造政治进程的方式。从意大利国家统一到战后第一个时期的几十年里,意大利学术地理学家通过理论反思、应用研究和教育帮助巩固了民族国家。地理学家的主要关注点是定义国家空间及其边界,特别是通过发展科学分析,可以确定阿尔卑斯山脉陆地边界的准确位置。这一科学话题与宗教的民族主义问题密切相关,在19世纪的最后20年里,宗教问题得到了越来越多的考虑。意大利地理学的认识论转向特别受到奥斯卡·佩舍尔和弗里德里希·拉策尔等学者在德国地理学中引入的新方法的影响,这些方法旨在对生物地理学与地球物理空间的关系形成一种普遍的理解。这一理论模式在政治辩论中的接受以及在随后的几十年中的应用方式被证明是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying Friedrich Ratzel's political and biogeography to the debate on natural borders in the Italian context (1880–1920)
Abstract. This paper examines the contribution of Italian academic geography to the processes of nation-building between ca. 1880–1920. With reference to Friedrich Ratzel's works, it explores the ways in which biological and vitalist theories shaped political processes. In the decades between Italy's national unification until the first post-war period, Italian academic geographers helped to consolidate the nation-state by means of theoretical reflection, applied research, and education. The main focus of geographers was in defining the national space and its boundaries, especially by developing a scientific analysis that could establish the exact position of the terrestrial border along the Alpine chain. The scientific topic was strongly connected with the nationalist question of irredenta, which garnered growing consideration in the last 2 decades of the 19th century. The epistemological turn in Italian geography was particularly influenced by new approaches in German geography introduced by scholars such as Oscar Peschel and Friedrich Ratzel and aimed to formulate a general understanding of biogeography in its relationship with the earth's physical space. The reception of this theoretical model in the political debate and the way it was applied in the following decades proved highly significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographica Helvetica
Geographica Helvetica Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Geographica Helvetica, the Swiss journal of geography, publishes contributions in all fields of geography as well as in related neighbouring disciplines. It is a multi-lingual journal, accepting articles in the three main Swiss languages, German, French, and Italian, as well as in English. It invites theoretical as well as empirical contributions. The journal welcomes contributions that specifically deal with empirical questions relating to Switzerland. The agenda of Geographica Helvetica is related to the specificity of Swiss geography as a meeting ground for different geographical traditions and languages (German, French, Italian and, more recently, a type of transnational, mainly English-speaking geography). The journal aims to become an ideal platform for the development of an informed, creative, and truly cosmopolitan geography. The journal will therefore provide space for cross-border theoretical debates around major thinkers – past and present – and the circulation of geographical ideas and concepts across Europe and beyond. The journal seeks to be a platform of debate also through innovative publication formats in its section "Interfaces", which publishes shorter interventions: reflection pieces on major thinkers as well as position papers (see manuscript types). Geographica Helvetica is promoted and supported by the following institutions: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Geographic and Ethnological Society of Zurich/Geographisch-Ethnographische Gesellschaft Zürich (GEGZ), and Swiss Association of Geography/Association Suisse de Géographie (ASG).
期刊最新文献
Die another day: explanations based on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) for the survival and non-survival of isolated ski lifts in Switzerland Von Stadt, Land, Fluss zur Nachhaltigkeitskunde: (Irr-)Wege der Ausgestaltung des Fachwissens in den Berliner Geographielehrplänen der letzten drei Jahrzehnte Intime Infrastrukturen: Feministisch-geographische Perspektiven auf Energie Book review: Mehr-als-menschliche Geographien – Schlüsselwerke, Beziehungen und Methodiken Shifting values at the cemetery – the artistic interventions of DeathLab
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1