左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中先发制人腹腔灌注后疼痛缓解的比较

S. Thiruselvi, Jee Tan Ann
{"title":"左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中先发制人腹腔灌注后疼痛缓解的比较","authors":"S. Thiruselvi, Jee Tan Ann","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pain in the immediate postoperative period is found to be less after laparoscopic than after conventional surgical techniques. Ropivacaine is often in favour of Bupivacaine to avoid the risks of toxicity. Levo-bupivacaine, a safer version of bupivacaine is a contender to Ropivacaine. We compare the pain relief provided by Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine instilled intra-abdominally during laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Methods and material: This is a double blinded randomized placebocontrolled study conducted on 120 patients in a public hospital over a period of 10 months. Using patient control analgesia (PCA), amount of morphine utilized to attain pain scores of 0-1, measured using visual analog score (VAS) was compared among placebo, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacanie group. Results: Data was analysed using analysis of variance with post-hoc multiple comparisons using Bonferroni test and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No significant difference was noted between the Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine groups (p = 1); utilization of morphine was similar for both drugs. However, significant difference was noted between placebo and local anaesthetics (p = 0). Conclusions: There appear to be no difference between Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine in terms of pain relief though Ropivacaine has been indicated to be less potent than Bupivacaine in some studies. Pre-emptive instillation of local anaesthetic for laparoscopic surgery is beneficial for post-operative pain relief. OriginAl ArTicle","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levo-Bupivacaine vs. Ropivacaine for Post-Operative Pain Relief after Pre-Emptive Intraperitoneal Instillation in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy\",\"authors\":\"S. Thiruselvi, Jee Tan Ann\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2377-4630/1410097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Pain in the immediate postoperative period is found to be less after laparoscopic than after conventional surgical techniques. Ropivacaine is often in favour of Bupivacaine to avoid the risks of toxicity. Levo-bupivacaine, a safer version of bupivacaine is a contender to Ropivacaine. We compare the pain relief provided by Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine instilled intra-abdominally during laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Methods and material: This is a double blinded randomized placebocontrolled study conducted on 120 patients in a public hospital over a period of 10 months. Using patient control analgesia (PCA), amount of morphine utilized to attain pain scores of 0-1, measured using visual analog score (VAS) was compared among placebo, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacanie group. Results: Data was analysed using analysis of variance with post-hoc multiple comparisons using Bonferroni test and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No significant difference was noted between the Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine groups (p = 1); utilization of morphine was similar for both drugs. However, significant difference was noted between placebo and local anaesthetics (p = 0). Conclusions: There appear to be no difference between Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine in terms of pain relief though Ropivacaine has been indicated to be less potent than Bupivacaine in some studies. Pre-emptive instillation of local anaesthetic for laparoscopic surgery is beneficial for post-operative pain relief. OriginAl ArTicle\",\"PeriodicalId\":90855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:发现腹腔镜术后疼痛比常规手术技术少。罗哌卡因通常比布比卡因更适合,以避免毒性风险。左旋布比卡因是布比卡因的一种更安全的版本,是罗哌卡因的竞争者。我们比较罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因在急性阑尾炎腹腔镜手术中腹腔内灌注的疼痛缓解效果。方法和材料:这是一项双盲随机安慰剂对照研究,在公立医院进行了为期10个月的120例患者。采用患者对照镇痛法(PCA),比较安慰剂组、罗哌卡因组和左旋布比卡因组吗啡用量达到0-1分的疼痛评分(VAS)。结果:数据采用方差分析,事后多重比较采用Bonferroni检验,p < 0.05为统计学显著性。罗哌卡因组与左旋布比卡因组间差异无统计学意义(p = 1);两种药物对吗啡的使用相似。结论:罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因在缓解疼痛方面似乎没有差异,尽管在一些研究中表明罗哌卡因的效力不如布比卡因。腹腔镜手术中预先注射局麻有利于术后疼痛的缓解。原文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Levo-Bupivacaine vs. Ropivacaine for Post-Operative Pain Relief after Pre-Emptive Intraperitoneal Instillation in Laparoscopic Appendicectomy
Introduction: Pain in the immediate postoperative period is found to be less after laparoscopic than after conventional surgical techniques. Ropivacaine is often in favour of Bupivacaine to avoid the risks of toxicity. Levo-bupivacaine, a safer version of bupivacaine is a contender to Ropivacaine. We compare the pain relief provided by Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine instilled intra-abdominally during laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Methods and material: This is a double blinded randomized placebocontrolled study conducted on 120 patients in a public hospital over a period of 10 months. Using patient control analgesia (PCA), amount of morphine utilized to attain pain scores of 0-1, measured using visual analog score (VAS) was compared among placebo, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacanie group. Results: Data was analysed using analysis of variance with post-hoc multiple comparisons using Bonferroni test and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No significant difference was noted between the Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine groups (p = 1); utilization of morphine was similar for both drugs. However, significant difference was noted between placebo and local anaesthetics (p = 0). Conclusions: There appear to be no difference between Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine in terms of pain relief though Ropivacaine has been indicated to be less potent than Bupivacaine in some studies. Pre-emptive instillation of local anaesthetic for laparoscopic surgery is beneficial for post-operative pain relief. OriginAl ArTicle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Trapezius Plane Block: Extended Use in Perioperative Pain Management in Nerve Transfer Surgeries A Questionnaire-Based Survey of Perioperative Utilisation of Ultrasound among Anaesthesiology Residents Pseudo Hypoxic Brain Swelling - An Unanticipated Life-Threatening Complication in Neurosurgery - Report of Two Cases with Review of Literature Anesthetic Management of the Case of Removal of Tracheobronchial Foreign Body in a Whistling Child: A Case Report The Use of the Liposomal Bupivacaine in the Quadratus Lumborum Block and Early Surgery Are Key Elements in Facilitating Ambulatory Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1