破裂和未破裂颅内动脉瘤预后的比较:来自印度尼西亚队列研究的结果

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bali Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3725
Julius July, Patrick P. Lukito, V. Angelica, J. H. Wijaya, Audrey Hamdoyo, Nyoman Aditya Sindunata, Rusli Muljadi
{"title":"破裂和未破裂颅内动脉瘤预后的比较:来自印度尼西亚队列研究的结果","authors":"Julius July, Patrick P. Lukito, V. Angelica, J. H. Wijaya, Audrey Hamdoyo, Nyoman Aditya Sindunata, Rusli Muljadi","doi":"10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A ruptured intracranial aneurysm has a high mortality rate. Moreover, many of its surviving patients have to live with severe disabilities. Therefore, surgical or endovascular treatment is recommended in some patients with a known aneurysm and a high risk of rupture. However, many patients are reluctant to undergo treatment, fearing its complications. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety in patients with a ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm.\nMethods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms in our hospital between 2017 to 2021. Our primary outcome was discharge functional outcome. We also evaluated cerebral infarction, stay duration, and mortality. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis.\nResults: 85 patients were included in this study. 69 (77.5%) patients were treated after rupture. Most patients were treated with clipping (78.8%). Patients with a ruptured aneurysm significantly had a higher risk of poor discharge functional outcome (OR 5.708 [1.061 – 30.712]; p 0.042). Six patients with a ruptured aneurysm died. Patients with a ruptured aneurysm also spent more time at the hospital. There was no mortality or complication in patients with an unruptured aneurysm.\nConclusion: Patients treated before their aneurysms ruptured had better outcomes with no complications. Therefore, treatment should be considered for high-risk patients.","PeriodicalId":44369,"journal":{"name":"Bali Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes between a ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm: results from an Indonesian cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Julius July, Patrick P. Lukito, V. Angelica, J. H. Wijaya, Audrey Hamdoyo, Nyoman Aditya Sindunata, Rusli Muljadi\",\"doi\":\"10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: A ruptured intracranial aneurysm has a high mortality rate. Moreover, many of its surviving patients have to live with severe disabilities. Therefore, surgical or endovascular treatment is recommended in some patients with a known aneurysm and a high risk of rupture. However, many patients are reluctant to undergo treatment, fearing its complications. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety in patients with a ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm.\\nMethods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms in our hospital between 2017 to 2021. Our primary outcome was discharge functional outcome. We also evaluated cerebral infarction, stay duration, and mortality. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis.\\nResults: 85 patients were included in this study. 69 (77.5%) patients were treated after rupture. Most patients were treated with clipping (78.8%). Patients with a ruptured aneurysm significantly had a higher risk of poor discharge functional outcome (OR 5.708 [1.061 – 30.712]; p 0.042). Six patients with a ruptured aneurysm died. Patients with a ruptured aneurysm also spent more time at the hospital. There was no mortality or complication in patients with an unruptured aneurysm.\\nConclusion: Patients treated before their aneurysms ruptured had better outcomes with no complications. Therefore, treatment should be considered for high-risk patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颅内动脉瘤破裂死亡率高。此外,许多幸存的患者不得不生活在严重的残疾中。因此,建议对一些已知动脉瘤和高破裂风险的患者进行手术或血管内治疗。然而,许多患者由于担心并发症而不愿接受治疗。本研究旨在评估颅内动脉瘤破裂和未破裂患者的治疗效果和安全性。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2017年至2021年我院治疗颅内动脉瘤的患者记录。我们的主要结果是出院功能结果。我们还评估了脑梗死、住院时间和死亡率。我们使用了双变量和多变量分析。结果:本研究共纳入85例患者。破裂后治疗69例(77.5%)。大多数患者接受了夹闭治疗(78.8%)。动脉瘤破裂的患者出院功能不良的风险明显更高(OR 5.708[1.061-30.712];p 0.042)。6名动脉瘤破裂患者死亡。动脉瘤破裂的患者在医院的时间也更长。未破裂动脉瘤患者没有死亡或并发症。结论:动脉瘤破裂前接受治疗的患者疗效较好,无并发症。因此,应考虑对高危患者进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of outcomes between a ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm: results from an Indonesian cohort study
Purpose: A ruptured intracranial aneurysm has a high mortality rate. Moreover, many of its surviving patients have to live with severe disabilities. Therefore, surgical or endovascular treatment is recommended in some patients with a known aneurysm and a high risk of rupture. However, many patients are reluctant to undergo treatment, fearing its complications. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety in patients with a ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms in our hospital between 2017 to 2021. Our primary outcome was discharge functional outcome. We also evaluated cerebral infarction, stay duration, and mortality. We used bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: 85 patients were included in this study. 69 (77.5%) patients were treated after rupture. Most patients were treated with clipping (78.8%). Patients with a ruptured aneurysm significantly had a higher risk of poor discharge functional outcome (OR 5.708 [1.061 – 30.712]; p 0.042). Six patients with a ruptured aneurysm died. Patients with a ruptured aneurysm also spent more time at the hospital. There was no mortality or complication in patients with an unruptured aneurysm. Conclusion: Patients treated before their aneurysms ruptured had better outcomes with no complications. Therefore, treatment should be considered for high-risk patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Medical Journal
Bali Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of fractionated ethanol red ginger (Zingiber officinale var. rubrum) extract on the pH level of Streptococcus gordonii metabolism (In-vitro Laboratory Experimental Research) Efficacy of combination therapy 5% permethrin cream and precipitated sulfur (ointment 2-4) compared with single therapy of 5% permethrin cream in children Hemangioma activity score evaluation in infantile hemangioma patients: a retrospective study Effect of Paraquat toxicity on lung and kidney organs on histopathological image assessment Mortality comparison between axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SND) among breast cancer pantient: A meta-analysis and systematic review study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1