护理职业的伦理实践:规范分析

J. Mathibe-Neke
{"title":"护理职业的伦理实践:规范分析","authors":"J. Mathibe-Neke","doi":"10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I1.00690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In response to an increasing number of litigations relating to nursing care errors, negligence or acts and omissions that arise mostly due to unprofessional or unethical behaviour compounded by the growing awareness of patient’s rights, nurse practitioners as such need an intervention by the regulatory body, the South African Nursing Council (SANC). Aim and purpose The argument presented pertains to the obligatory role of SANC as a regulatory body to uphold professional and ethical practice for nurses in terms of the nursing curriculum, the scope of practice, the code of ethics and continuing professional development. Methodology The methodology was based on the analysis of relevant SANC legislation under the provision of the Nursing Act 33 of 2005 as amended. Document review, a technique used to “categorise, investigate, interpret and identify limitations of written documents” was undertaken. The study referenced some of the general literature relating to nursing ethics and professionalism. A waiver for ethical clearance was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee. Conclusion The overall impact of the analysis lies in its contribution to enhancing nursing practice, with specific focus on upholding professional and ethical practice. SANC as a custodian of the nursing profession need to address limitations and develop a balance for the regulation and monitoring of ethical practice in both nursing education and clinical practice. Keywords: ethical practice; normative analysis; nursing profession; role; South African Nursing Council","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Mathibe-Neke\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I1.00690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background In response to an increasing number of litigations relating to nursing care errors, negligence or acts and omissions that arise mostly due to unprofessional or unethical behaviour compounded by the growing awareness of patient’s rights, nurse practitioners as such need an intervention by the regulatory body, the South African Nursing Council (SANC). Aim and purpose The argument presented pertains to the obligatory role of SANC as a regulatory body to uphold professional and ethical practice for nurses in terms of the nursing curriculum, the scope of practice, the code of ethics and continuing professional development. Methodology The methodology was based on the analysis of relevant SANC legislation under the provision of the Nursing Act 33 of 2005 as amended. Document review, a technique used to “categorise, investigate, interpret and identify limitations of written documents” was undertaken. The study referenced some of the general literature relating to nursing ethics and professionalism. A waiver for ethical clearance was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee. Conclusion The overall impact of the analysis lies in its contribution to enhancing nursing practice, with specific focus on upholding professional and ethical practice. SANC as a custodian of the nursing profession need to address limitations and develop a balance for the regulation and monitoring of ethical practice in both nursing education and clinical practice. Keywords: ethical practice; normative analysis; nursing profession; role; South African Nursing Council\",\"PeriodicalId\":43498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I1.00690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2020.V13I1.00690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要背景针对越来越多的与护理失误、疏忽或作为和不作为有关的诉讼,这些诉讼主要是由于不专业或不道德的行为,再加上对患者权利的日益认识,执业护士需要监管机构南非护理委员会(SANC)的干预。目的和目的所提出的论点涉及SANC作为一个监管机构在护理课程、实践范围、道德规范和持续职业发展方面维护护士职业和道德实践的义务作用。方法该方法基于对经修订的2005年《护理法》第33条规定的相关SANC立法的分析。文件审查是一种用于“对书面文件进行分类、调查、解释和识别其局限性”的技术。该研究引用了一些与护理伦理和专业精神有关的一般文献。从人类研究伦理委员会获得了伦理许可豁免。结论该分析的总体影响在于它有助于加强护理实践,特别关注维护职业道德实践。SANC作为护理专业的守护者,需要解决护理教育和临床实践中道德实践的监管和监督的局限性,并建立平衡。关键词:伦理实践;规范分析;护理专业;角色南非护理理事会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis
ABSTRACT Background In response to an increasing number of litigations relating to nursing care errors, negligence or acts and omissions that arise mostly due to unprofessional or unethical behaviour compounded by the growing awareness of patient’s rights, nurse practitioners as such need an intervention by the regulatory body, the South African Nursing Council (SANC). Aim and purpose The argument presented pertains to the obligatory role of SANC as a regulatory body to uphold professional and ethical practice for nurses in terms of the nursing curriculum, the scope of practice, the code of ethics and continuing professional development. Methodology The methodology was based on the analysis of relevant SANC legislation under the provision of the Nursing Act 33 of 2005 as amended. Document review, a technique used to “categorise, investigate, interpret and identify limitations of written documents” was undertaken. The study referenced some of the general literature relating to nursing ethics and professionalism. A waiver for ethical clearance was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee. Conclusion The overall impact of the analysis lies in its contribution to enhancing nursing practice, with specific focus on upholding professional and ethical practice. SANC as a custodian of the nursing profession need to address limitations and develop a balance for the regulation and monitoring of ethical practice in both nursing education and clinical practice. Keywords: ethical practice; normative analysis; nursing profession; role; South African Nursing Council
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic ethical approaches to evangelising in the medical encounter The situation in Gaza – will cruelty and hatred triumph? Gaza and international law: The global obligation to protect life and health Is there a legal and ethical duty on doctors to inform patients of the likely co-payment costs should they be treated by practitioners who have contracted out of medical scheme rates? Three to one – an ethicolegal outline of mitochondrial donation in the South African context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1