坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆面部撕裂伤的病因、模式和治疗结果

K. Sohal, J. Moshy
{"title":"坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆面部撕裂伤的病因、模式和治疗结果","authors":"K. Sohal, J. Moshy","doi":"10.4314/THRB.V21I2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Facial laceration is amongst the commonly encountered soft tissue injury in the care of the traumatized patients, and its optimal treatment is important for minimizing subsequent complications. This study aimed at determining the etiology, pattern, and outcome of management of facial lacerations among patients attended at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. \nMethods: This was a four months’ prospective study of all consecutive patients with facial lacerations who were attended in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of the Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). The variables examined included socio-demographic characteristics, etiology of a facial laceration, prior management before referral to MNH, and the outcome of treatment. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS statistics for windows version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) software. \nResults: Seventy-six patients with facial lacerations were included in the study. The male to female ratio was 8:1. The age of the patients ranged from 16 to 57 years, with a mean age of 31.63 ± 10.02 years. Motor traffic crashes (51, 67.1%), violence (18, 23.7%) and falls (7, 9.2%) were the etiological factors. The commonest affected facial esthetic zones were forehead (25, 32.9%), and the upper lip (24, 31.6%). The majority (60%) of wounds that were sutured/repaired in other health facilities prior to referral to MNH had a poor approximation of wound edges. Scarring was the commonest complication. \nConclusion: Facial laceration affected males eight times more than females. Road traffic crash was the most common etiological factor. The forehead was the most frequently affected facial esthetic zone. The majority of patients treated in other health facilities prior to referral to a tertiary hospital had poorly approximated wound edges. Scarring was the most common complication of facial lacerations.","PeriodicalId":39815,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Etiology, pattern and outcome of management of facial lacerations in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"K. Sohal, J. Moshy\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/THRB.V21I2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Facial laceration is amongst the commonly encountered soft tissue injury in the care of the traumatized patients, and its optimal treatment is important for minimizing subsequent complications. This study aimed at determining the etiology, pattern, and outcome of management of facial lacerations among patients attended at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. \\nMethods: This was a four months’ prospective study of all consecutive patients with facial lacerations who were attended in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of the Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). The variables examined included socio-demographic characteristics, etiology of a facial laceration, prior management before referral to MNH, and the outcome of treatment. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS statistics for windows version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) software. \\nResults: Seventy-six patients with facial lacerations were included in the study. The male to female ratio was 8:1. The age of the patients ranged from 16 to 57 years, with a mean age of 31.63 ± 10.02 years. Motor traffic crashes (51, 67.1%), violence (18, 23.7%) and falls (7, 9.2%) were the etiological factors. The commonest affected facial esthetic zones were forehead (25, 32.9%), and the upper lip (24, 31.6%). The majority (60%) of wounds that were sutured/repaired in other health facilities prior to referral to MNH had a poor approximation of wound edges. Scarring was the commonest complication. \\nConclusion: Facial laceration affected males eight times more than females. Road traffic crash was the most common etiological factor. The forehead was the most frequently affected facial esthetic zone. The majority of patients treated in other health facilities prior to referral to a tertiary hospital had poorly approximated wound edges. Scarring was the most common complication of facial lacerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzania Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzania Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/THRB.V21I2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/THRB.V21I2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:面部撕裂伤是创伤患者护理中常见的软组织损伤之一,其最佳治疗对于减少后续并发症至关重要。本研究旨在确定在坦桑尼亚Muhimbili国立医院就诊的患者面部撕裂伤的病因、模式和治疗结果。方法:这是一项为期四个月的前瞻性研究,研究对象是在Muhimbili国立医院(MNH)口腔颌面外科就诊的所有连续面部撕裂患者。检查的变量包括社会人口学特征、面部撕裂的病因、转诊到MNH之前的治疗情况以及治疗结果。使用IBM SPSS统计软件对windows version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp .)进行数据分析。结果:76例面部撕裂伤患者纳入研究。男女比例为8:1。患者年龄16 ~ 57岁,平均年龄31.63±10.02岁。机动车碰撞(51例,67.1%)、暴力(18例,23.7%)和跌倒(7例,9.2%)是导致死亡的原因。最常见的面部美容区为前额(25.32.9%)和上唇(24.31.6%)。大多数(60%)在转诊到MNH之前在其他卫生机构缝合/修复的伤口与伤口边缘的近似程度很差。结疤是最常见的并发症。结论:男性面部撕裂伤发生率是女性的8倍。道路交通事故是最常见的病因。前额是最常受影响的面部审美区域。在转诊到三级医院之前,在其他卫生设施接受治疗的大多数患者伤口边缘不太接近。疤痕是面部撕裂伤最常见的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Etiology, pattern and outcome of management of facial lacerations in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Background: Facial laceration is amongst the commonly encountered soft tissue injury in the care of the traumatized patients, and its optimal treatment is important for minimizing subsequent complications. This study aimed at determining the etiology, pattern, and outcome of management of facial lacerations among patients attended at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania. Methods: This was a four months’ prospective study of all consecutive patients with facial lacerations who were attended in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of the Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). The variables examined included socio-demographic characteristics, etiology of a facial laceration, prior management before referral to MNH, and the outcome of treatment. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS statistics for windows version 22 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) software. Results: Seventy-six patients with facial lacerations were included in the study. The male to female ratio was 8:1. The age of the patients ranged from 16 to 57 years, with a mean age of 31.63 ± 10.02 years. Motor traffic crashes (51, 67.1%), violence (18, 23.7%) and falls (7, 9.2%) were the etiological factors. The commonest affected facial esthetic zones were forehead (25, 32.9%), and the upper lip (24, 31.6%). The majority (60%) of wounds that were sutured/repaired in other health facilities prior to referral to MNH had a poor approximation of wound edges. Scarring was the commonest complication. Conclusion: Facial laceration affected males eight times more than females. Road traffic crash was the most common etiological factor. The forehead was the most frequently affected facial esthetic zone. The majority of patients treated in other health facilities prior to referral to a tertiary hospital had poorly approximated wound edges. Scarring was the most common complication of facial lacerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Tanzania Journal of Health Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Knowledge on the Risk Factors for Diabetic Foot Syndrome and Self-Foot Care Practices among Diabetic Patients at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Antimicrobial Resistance among neonates with neonatal Sepsis Morogoro Tanzania Risk factors of delayed developmental milestones among infants attending RCH clinics in Dodoma region. A cross-sectional studydoma region Nutritional Status Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Tanzania Factors Associated with Anthropometric Status of Primary School Children in Dodoma, Tanzaniaania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1