{"title":"反对民粹主义的安全网?政治效能和民主能力对民粹主义态度的互动效应研究","authors":"M. Bene, Zsolt Boda","doi":"10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.","PeriodicalId":20269,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Exchange","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A safety net against populism? An investigation of the interaction effect of political efficacy and democratic capacities on populist attitudes\",\"authors\":\"M. Bene, Zsolt Boda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Research Exchange\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Research Exchange\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A safety net against populism? An investigation of the interaction effect of political efficacy and democratic capacities on populist attitudes
The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.