反对民粹主义的安全网?政治效能和民主能力对民粹主义态度的互动效应研究

IF 1.8 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Research Exchange Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385
M. Bene, Zsolt Boda
{"title":"反对民粹主义的安全网?政治效能和民主能力对民粹主义态度的互动效应研究","authors":"M. Bene, Zsolt Boda","doi":"10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.","PeriodicalId":20269,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Exchange","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A safety net against populism? An investigation of the interaction effect of political efficacy and democratic capacities on populist attitudes\",\"authors\":\"M. Bene, Zsolt Boda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Research Exchange\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Research Exchange\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2023.2220385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该论文将民粹主义解释为民主政体运作方式与公民如何构想自己相对于政体的愿望、需求和身份之间不匹配的症状。然而,民主需要公民的某些态度和技能:政治参与、反思态度、对权力持有者的审查,以及在基于信任的合作与对政治当局的批评反应之间取得平衡。与此相一致,我们调查了在具有和不具有某些民主能力的人的情况下,外部和内部政治效率如何与民粹主义态度相关联。我们根据一项覆盖15个欧洲国家的原始调查得出的结论表明,在民主能力不完整的人的情况下,更高的内部政治效率与更民粹主义的态度有关,但完全的民主能力产生了对抗这种影响的“安全网”。然而,外部政治能力和民粹主义态度之间的负面关系并不取决于这些能力:对政治精英反应能力的强烈不满会导致更多的民粹主义态度,而不考虑人们的民主背景。尽管如此,我们的研究结果表明,在政治社会化或公民教育中更加强调某些民主实践和价值观,可能会阻止更强的政治自信转变为民粹主义的政治观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A safety net against populism? An investigation of the interaction effect of political efficacy and democratic capacities on populist attitudes
The paper interprets populism as a symptom of a mismatch between how the democratic polity operates and how citizens conceive their own aspirations, needs and identities vis-à-vis the polity. However, democracy requests certain attitudes and skills from citizens: political engagement, a re fl ective attitude, scrutiny of the power holders and balancing trust-based cooperation with critical reactions towards political authorities. In line with this, we investigate how external and internal political e ffi cacy are associated with populist attitudes in the case of people who have and who do not have certain democratic capacities. Our fi ndings drawing upon an original survey covering 15 European countries show that higher internal political e ffi cacy is associated with more populist attitudes in the case of people with incomplete democratic capacities, but complete democratic capacities yield a ‘ safety net ’ against this e ff ect. However, the negative relationship between external political e ffi cacy and populist attitudes does not depend on these capacities: stronger dissatisfaction with the responsiveness of political elites leads to more populist attitudes irrespective of people ’ s democratic background. Nonetheless, our fi ndings imply that a stronger emphasis on certain democratic practices and values in political socialization or civic education could prevent stronger political con fi dence would turn into populist views about politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Research Exchange
Political Research Exchange POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online repression and transnational social movements: Thailand and the #MilkTeaAlliance Did Russia’s invasion of Ukraine unite Europe? Cohesion and divisions of the European Parliament on Twitter Quantifying the ideational context: political frames, meaning trajectories and punctuated equilibria in Spanish mainstream press during the Catalan nationalist challenge Breakdown by disengagement: Tunisia’s transition from representative democracy Merging the Great Patriotic War and Russian warfare in Ukraine. A case-study of Russian military patriotic clubs in 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1