二元实践复制投资和交易期权

Rohmi Lestari, Z. Arifin
{"title":"二元实践复制投资和交易期权","authors":"Rohmi Lestari, Z. Arifin","doi":"10.26623/jic.v7i1.4875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji keberadaan praktik operator binary option yang dianggap ilegal di Indonesia. Melakukan investigasi faktor yang melatarbelakangi keberadaan praktik tidak etis yang dilakukan oleh operator binary option yang menimbulkan kerugian pemegang opsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa binary option bukan merupakan instrument investasi atau trading. Terdapat kelemahan regulasi dalam mengatur mengenai binary option. Belum ada sanksi hukum yang tegas bagi penyelenggara binary option. Yang dianggap bertindak tidak etis adalah para afiliator dan atau influencer, sehingga afiliator yang memperoleh sanksi hukum. Masih rendahnya tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia menyebabkan masyarakat sering tergoda iming-iming return tinggi. Mereka belum bisa membedakan antara investasi, trading dan binary option. Penelitian ini juga mengemukakan bahwa metode affiliate marketing digunakan untuk mengambil hati para pemegang opsi. Strategi framing dan flexing berhasil menggoda mereka dalam kondisi tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia masih rendah.Kebaruan dari penelitian ini berupa penjelasan tentang praktik operator binary option sebagai permainan zero-sum, bukan merupakan investasi maupun trading. This study aims to examine the existence of binary options operator practices considered illegal in Indonesia. Conduct an investigation of the factors behind the existence of unethical practices by binary options operators that cause losses to option holders. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that binary options are not investment or trading instruments. There are regulatory weaknesses in regulating binary options. There are no strict legal sanctions for binary options operators. Those who are considered to be acting unethically are affiliates and or influencers, so affiliates will receive legal sanctions. The low level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia causes people to be tempted by the lure of high returns. They have not been able to distinguish between investing, trading, and binary options. This study also suggests that affiliate marketing methods are used to win the hearts of option holders. The framing and flexing strategies succeeded in tempting them because the level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia is still low. The novelty of this research is an explanation of the practice of binary options operators as a zero-sum game, not an investment or trading.    ","PeriodicalId":31921,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Godaan Praktik Binary Option Berkedok Investasi Dan Trading\",\"authors\":\"Rohmi Lestari, Z. Arifin\",\"doi\":\"10.26623/jic.v7i1.4875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji keberadaan praktik operator binary option yang dianggap ilegal di Indonesia. Melakukan investigasi faktor yang melatarbelakangi keberadaan praktik tidak etis yang dilakukan oleh operator binary option yang menimbulkan kerugian pemegang opsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa binary option bukan merupakan instrument investasi atau trading. Terdapat kelemahan regulasi dalam mengatur mengenai binary option. Belum ada sanksi hukum yang tegas bagi penyelenggara binary option. Yang dianggap bertindak tidak etis adalah para afiliator dan atau influencer, sehingga afiliator yang memperoleh sanksi hukum. Masih rendahnya tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia menyebabkan masyarakat sering tergoda iming-iming return tinggi. Mereka belum bisa membedakan antara investasi, trading dan binary option. Penelitian ini juga mengemukakan bahwa metode affiliate marketing digunakan untuk mengambil hati para pemegang opsi. Strategi framing dan flexing berhasil menggoda mereka dalam kondisi tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia masih rendah.Kebaruan dari penelitian ini berupa penjelasan tentang praktik operator binary option sebagai permainan zero-sum, bukan merupakan investasi maupun trading. This study aims to examine the existence of binary options operator practices considered illegal in Indonesia. Conduct an investigation of the factors behind the existence of unethical practices by binary options operators that cause losses to option holders. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that binary options are not investment or trading instruments. There are regulatory weaknesses in regulating binary options. There are no strict legal sanctions for binary options operators. Those who are considered to be acting unethically are affiliates and or influencers, so affiliates will receive legal sanctions. The low level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia causes people to be tempted by the lure of high returns. They have not been able to distinguish between investing, trading, and binary options. This study also suggests that affiliate marketing methods are used to win the hearts of option holders. The framing and flexing strategies succeeded in tempting them because the level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia is still low. The novelty of this research is an explanation of the practice of binary options operators as a zero-sum game, not an investment or trading.    \",\"PeriodicalId\":31921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ius Constituendum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ius Constituendum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究旨在审查在印尼被认为是非法的二进制操作程序的存在。调查导致选项持有者损失的二元选择操作员所做的不道德行为背后的因素。本研究采用规范核法进行研究。这项研究的结果表明,二进制选项不是投资或贸易的工具。二进制选项的监管缺陷。针对二进制选项的组织者还没有得到明确的法律制裁。被认为是不道德行为的煽动者或煽动者,使受法律制裁的煽动者。印尼数字金融素数仍然较低,这导致人们经常受到高额回报的诱惑。他们还不能区分投资、交易和二元选择。这项研究还指出,非营利营销方法是用来吸引期权持有人的心。在印尼,框架和flexing成功地在数字金融素权水平下引诱了他们。这项研究的新奇之处在于,将二进制选项的操作解释为零和游戏,而不是投资或交易。这项研究表明,在印尼,二元选择操作的存在是非法的。后果调查由二元操作选择造成损失的非营利措施背后的因素。这项研究表明有一个合理的判断。这项研究的结果表明,这些二元选择不是投资或交易工具。在监管二进制选项中有调节的磨损。对二进制操作没有法律限制。那些被认为行为不礼貌的人是有影响力的,或者有影响力的人,所以这些人会得到法律援助。印尼数字金融素来的低水平的知识导致人们被上层社会的激情所鼓舞。它们不能在投资、交易和二元选择之间相互竞争。这项研究还建议,积极的市场营销方法将赢得选民的心。框架和灵活性策略在印尼之所以成功,是因为印尼数字金融扫盲的水平仍然很低。这项研究的小说是对二进制操作的研究,而不是投资或交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Godaan Praktik Binary Option Berkedok Investasi Dan Trading
 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji keberadaan praktik operator binary option yang dianggap ilegal di Indonesia. Melakukan investigasi faktor yang melatarbelakangi keberadaan praktik tidak etis yang dilakukan oleh operator binary option yang menimbulkan kerugian pemegang opsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa binary option bukan merupakan instrument investasi atau trading. Terdapat kelemahan regulasi dalam mengatur mengenai binary option. Belum ada sanksi hukum yang tegas bagi penyelenggara binary option. Yang dianggap bertindak tidak etis adalah para afiliator dan atau influencer, sehingga afiliator yang memperoleh sanksi hukum. Masih rendahnya tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia menyebabkan masyarakat sering tergoda iming-iming return tinggi. Mereka belum bisa membedakan antara investasi, trading dan binary option. Penelitian ini juga mengemukakan bahwa metode affiliate marketing digunakan untuk mengambil hati para pemegang opsi. Strategi framing dan flexing berhasil menggoda mereka dalam kondisi tingkat literasi keuangan digital di Indonesia masih rendah.Kebaruan dari penelitian ini berupa penjelasan tentang praktik operator binary option sebagai permainan zero-sum, bukan merupakan investasi maupun trading. This study aims to examine the existence of binary options operator practices considered illegal in Indonesia. Conduct an investigation of the factors behind the existence of unethical practices by binary options operators that cause losses to option holders. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that binary options are not investment or trading instruments. There are regulatory weaknesses in regulating binary options. There are no strict legal sanctions for binary options operators. Those who are considered to be acting unethically are affiliates and or influencers, so affiliates will receive legal sanctions. The low level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia causes people to be tempted by the lure of high returns. They have not been able to distinguish between investing, trading, and binary options. This study also suggests that affiliate marketing methods are used to win the hearts of option holders. The framing and flexing strategies succeeded in tempting them because the level of digital financial literacy in Indonesia is still low. The novelty of this research is an explanation of the practice of binary options operators as a zero-sum game, not an investment or trading.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kemaslahatan dalam Perkawinan Poligami Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Establishment of Special Land Courts as an Effort to Settlement of Land Cases Analisis Pemberian Hibah Kepada Anak Di Bawah Umur Melalui Proses Handlichting Berdasarkan Hukum Perdata The Urgency of Determining the Post-Divorce Iddah Payment Period in Indonesian Religious Courts Praktik Persekongkolan Tender dalam Pengadaan Paket Pembangunan Revetment dan Pengurungan Lahan di Pelabuhan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1