两种不同的教育学模式:基督教宗教教育中教师教育学能力的再思考

Zummy Anselmus Dami, Marlon Butarbutar, Sri Wahyuni Kusradi
{"title":"两种不同的教育学模式:基督教宗教教育中教师教育学能力的再思考","authors":"Zummy Anselmus Dami, Marlon Butarbutar, Sri Wahyuni Kusradi","doi":"10.1177/20569971221118075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to analyze the differences between two models of pedagogy. The research method used is content analysis. Results showed a significant difference between neoliberal pedagogy and the pedagogy of shalom. The aspects of difference were the purpose of Christian religious education (CRE), the content of CRE, the target of CRE, the method of CRE, the role of CRE teachers, and students’ dispositions and competencies.","PeriodicalId":13840,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two different models of pedagogy: Rethinking teachers’ pedagogy competency in Christian religious education\",\"authors\":\"Zummy Anselmus Dami, Marlon Butarbutar, Sri Wahyuni Kusradi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20569971221118075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to analyze the differences between two models of pedagogy. The research method used is content analysis. Results showed a significant difference between neoliberal pedagogy and the pedagogy of shalom. The aspects of difference were the purpose of Christian religious education (CRE), the content of CRE, the target of CRE, the method of CRE, the role of CRE teachers, and students’ dispositions and competencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Christianity & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Christianity & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971221118075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971221118075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在分析两种教育学模式之间的差异。所使用的研究方法是内容分析。结果表明,新自由主义教育学与沙洛姆教育学之间存在显著差异。差异的方面是基督教宗教教育的目的、内容、目标、方法、教师的角色以及学生的性格和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two different models of pedagogy: Rethinking teachers’ pedagogy competency in Christian religious education
This research aimed to analyze the differences between two models of pedagogy. The research method used is content analysis. Results showed a significant difference between neoliberal pedagogy and the pedagogy of shalom. The aspects of difference were the purpose of Christian religious education (CRE), the content of CRE, the target of CRE, the method of CRE, the role of CRE teachers, and students’ dispositions and competencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Emerging Voices: Helping College Students Reclaim Christian Proclamation Christian higher education in fractured societies: Societal challenges and agapeic wisdom Cultivating Mentors: Sharing Wisdom in Christian Higher Education Fractal imagination and Christian formation The child and God: Some reflections from disability theology on divine-child encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1