梦想*希望进入未来

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093975
S. Arndt, Omid Soltani
{"title":"梦想*希望进入未来","authors":"S. Arndt, Omid Soltani","doi":"10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Harlem Renaissance espoused the modernist belief in radical new beginnings and the celebration of (aesthetic) interventions into old certainties, while resisting the “monologism” (Bakhtin) of white Western modernity and modernism. As a result, the Harlem Renaissance strived towards new futureS, nourished by dreams and hopes. The same endeavour was echoed but handled differently by the (post)modernist aesthetic strategy of Afrofuturism. Both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism’s conceptions of dreams and hopes, in given intersections (hence dream*hopes, the asterisk marking the fluid entanglement of the two concepts) and as agents of future-making, are at the fore of this article. Framed by critical race theory and underpinned by “future” as a critical category of analysis, it starts off with an examination of dream*hoping agencies of future-making in view of both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism. In doing so, Georgia Douglas Johnson and Zora Neale Hurston as well as Wanuri Kahiu’s negotiations of the agencies of dreams are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45929,"journal":{"name":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DREAM*HOPING INTO FUTURES\",\"authors\":\"S. Arndt, Omid Soltani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Harlem Renaissance espoused the modernist belief in radical new beginnings and the celebration of (aesthetic) interventions into old certainties, while resisting the “monologism” (Bakhtin) of white Western modernity and modernism. As a result, the Harlem Renaissance strived towards new futureS, nourished by dreams and hopes. The same endeavour was echoed but handled differently by the (post)modernist aesthetic strategy of Afrofuturism. Both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism’s conceptions of dreams and hopes, in given intersections (hence dream*hopes, the asterisk marking the fluid entanglement of the two concepts) and as agents of future-making, are at the fore of this article. Framed by critical race theory and underpinned by “future” as a critical category of analysis, it starts off with an examination of dream*hoping agencies of future-making in view of both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism. In doing so, Georgia Douglas Johnson and Zora Neale Hurston as well as Wanuri Kahiu’s negotiations of the agencies of dreams are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哈莱姆文艺复兴支持现代主义对激进的新开端的信仰和对旧确定性的(美学)干预的庆祝,同时抵制西方白人现代性和现代主义的“一元论”(巴赫金)。因此,哈莱姆文艺复兴运动在梦想和希望的滋养下,努力走向新的未来。非洲未来主义的(后)现代主义美学策略回应了同样的努力,但处理方式不同。哈莱姆文艺复兴和非洲未来主义的梦想和希望的概念,在给定的交叉点(因此梦想*希望,星号标志着这两个概念的流动纠缠)和作为未来创造的代理人,都是本文的重点。本书以批判种族理论为框架,以“未来”为分析的批判范畴为基础,从哈莱姆文艺复兴和非洲未来主义的角度出发,对未来创造的梦想希望机构进行了考察。在此过程中,我们讨论了乔治亚·道格拉斯·约翰逊和佐拉·尼尔·赫斯顿以及瓦努里·卡休关于梦想代理的谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DREAM*HOPING INTO FUTURES
Abstract The Harlem Renaissance espoused the modernist belief in radical new beginnings and the celebration of (aesthetic) interventions into old certainties, while resisting the “monologism” (Bakhtin) of white Western modernity and modernism. As a result, the Harlem Renaissance strived towards new futureS, nourished by dreams and hopes. The same endeavour was echoed but handled differently by the (post)modernist aesthetic strategy of Afrofuturism. Both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism’s conceptions of dreams and hopes, in given intersections (hence dream*hopes, the asterisk marking the fluid entanglement of the two concepts) and as agents of future-making, are at the fore of this article. Framed by critical race theory and underpinned by “future” as a critical category of analysis, it starts off with an examination of dream*hoping agencies of future-making in view of both the Harlem Renaissance and Afrofuturism. In doing so, Georgia Douglas Johnson and Zora Neale Hurston as well as Wanuri Kahiu’s negotiations of the agencies of dreams are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities was established in September 1993 to provide an international forum for vanguard work in the theoretical humanities. In itself a contentious category, "theoretical humanities" represents the productive nexus of work in the disciplinary fields of literary criticism and theory, philosophy, and cultural studies. The journal is dedicated to the refreshing of intellectual coordinates, and to the challenging and vivifying process of re-thinking. Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities encourages a critical engagement with theory in terms of disciplinary development and intellectual and political usefulness, the inquiry into and articulation of culture.
期刊最新文献
General Issue I 2023 “I Just Care so Much About the Koalas” Notes on the contributors Enjoyment With(Out) Exception Resisting Academic Neoliberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1