{"title":"一致性解释","authors":"Leone Niglia","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is still assumed in scholarship that ‘contra legem’ characterizes the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on conforming interpretation. This article argues, through a new reading of the relevant CJEU jurisprudence, that the case law on conforming interpretation has been taking a new direction away from ‘contra legem’. A critique of the new jurisprudence is then proposed through pointing to two unrenounceable virtues of the ‘contra legem’ requirement – towards making scholarship aware of the urgent need to take seriously, and critically face, the new jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conforming Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Leone Niglia\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/erpl2022031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is still assumed in scholarship that ‘contra legem’ characterizes the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on conforming interpretation. This article argues, through a new reading of the relevant CJEU jurisprudence, that the case law on conforming interpretation has been taking a new direction away from ‘contra legem’. A critique of the new jurisprudence is then proposed through pointing to two unrenounceable virtues of the ‘contra legem’ requirement – towards making scholarship aware of the urgent need to take seriously, and critically face, the new jurisprudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is still assumed in scholarship that ‘contra legem’ characterizes the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on conforming interpretation. This article argues, through a new reading of the relevant CJEU jurisprudence, that the case law on conforming interpretation has been taking a new direction away from ‘contra legem’. A critique of the new jurisprudence is then proposed through pointing to two unrenounceable virtues of the ‘contra legem’ requirement – towards making scholarship aware of the urgent need to take seriously, and critically face, the new jurisprudence.