绿色转型综合评价与区域差异——基于“政府-企业-居民”三维参与者视角的分析

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106843
Ruyin Long , Siyu Bao , Meifen Wu , Hong Chen
{"title":"绿色转型综合评价与区域差异——基于“政府-企业-居民”三维参与者视角的分析","authors":"Ruyin Long ,&nbsp;Siyu Bao ,&nbsp;Meifen Wu ,&nbsp;Hong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Green transformation has become an inevitable choice to realize carbon peaks and carbon neutrality<span> targets, while promoting green transformation index (GTI) requires the joint efforts of the whole society. Therefore, based on China's provincial data from 2006 to 2019, a GTI evaluation indicator system with the framework of three-dimensional participants perspective was constructed. The GTI was measured by using the comprehensive evaluation method of vertical-and-horizontal scatter degree method and global entropy weight -TOPSIS- grey relational analysis method. In addition, the Dagum </span></span>Gini coefficient<span> and its decomposition, Kernel density estimation and Moran's I methods were used to further analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics<span> of regional differences in GTI. The results showed that: (1) In 2006–2019, China's overall and four regions' GTIs showed an overall growth trend, but the growth rate gradually slowed down after 2013. Governments' environmental governance and enterprises' green production dimensions contributed to GTI, while residents' green consumption dimension constrained it. (2) The regional differences in China's GTI were mainly caused by the inter-regional differences, and the contribution rate of inter-regional differences was increasing. The intra-regional differences and inter-regional differences of GTIs in the four regions were all on a decreasing trend. (3) The absolute differences in China's overall and four regions' GTIs were gradually decreasing, gradually forming a stable polarization status of H-H aggregation and L-L aggregation. Among them, the eastern and central regions were H-H aggregation, while the western and northeast regions were L-L aggregation. Finally, recommendations were put forward according to results.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 106843"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overall evaluation and regional differences of green transformation: Analysis based on “government-enterprise-resident” three-dimensional participants perspective\",\"authors\":\"Ruyin Long ,&nbsp;Siyu Bao ,&nbsp;Meifen Wu ,&nbsp;Hong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Green transformation has become an inevitable choice to realize carbon peaks and carbon neutrality<span> targets, while promoting green transformation index (GTI) requires the joint efforts of the whole society. Therefore, based on China's provincial data from 2006 to 2019, a GTI evaluation indicator system with the framework of three-dimensional participants perspective was constructed. The GTI was measured by using the comprehensive evaluation method of vertical-and-horizontal scatter degree method and global entropy weight -TOPSIS- grey relational analysis method. In addition, the Dagum </span></span>Gini coefficient<span> and its decomposition, Kernel density estimation and Moran's I methods were used to further analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics<span> of regional differences in GTI. The results showed that: (1) In 2006–2019, China's overall and four regions' GTIs showed an overall growth trend, but the growth rate gradually slowed down after 2013. Governments' environmental governance and enterprises' green production dimensions contributed to GTI, while residents' green consumption dimension constrained it. (2) The regional differences in China's GTI were mainly caused by the inter-regional differences, and the contribution rate of inter-regional differences was increasing. The intra-regional differences and inter-regional differences of GTIs in the four regions were all on a decreasing trend. (3) The absolute differences in China's overall and four regions' GTIs were gradually decreasing, gradually forming a stable polarization status of H-H aggregation and L-L aggregation. Among them, the eastern and central regions were H-H aggregation, while the western and northeast regions were L-L aggregation. Finally, recommendations were put forward according to results.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925522001093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925522001093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

绿色转型已成为实现碳峰值和碳中和目标的必然选择,而提升绿色转型指数(GTI)需要全社会的共同努力。因此,基于2006 - 2019年中国省级数据,构建了三维参与者视角框架下的GTI评价指标体系。采用纵横分散度综合评价法和全局熵权- topsis -灰色关联分析法对GTI进行测度。此外,采用Dagum基尼系数及其分解、核密度估计和Moran’s I方法进一步分析了GTI区域差异的时空特征。结果表明:(1)2006-2019年,中国整体和四地区gti总体呈增长趋势,但2013年后增速逐渐放缓;政府环境治理和企业绿色生产维度对GTI有促进作用,居民绿色消费维度对GTI有制约作用。(2)中国GTI的区域差异主要由区域间差异引起,且区域间差异的贡献率呈上升趋势。4个地区gti的区域内差异和区域间差异均呈减小趋势。③中国总体和四区gti的绝对差异逐渐减小,逐渐形成H-H聚集和L-L聚集的稳定极化状态。其中,东部和中部地区为H-H聚集型,西部和东北部地区为L-L聚集型。最后,根据研究结果提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overall evaluation and regional differences of green transformation: Analysis based on “government-enterprise-resident” three-dimensional participants perspective

Green transformation has become an inevitable choice to realize carbon peaks and carbon neutrality targets, while promoting green transformation index (GTI) requires the joint efforts of the whole society. Therefore, based on China's provincial data from 2006 to 2019, a GTI evaluation indicator system with the framework of three-dimensional participants perspective was constructed. The GTI was measured by using the comprehensive evaluation method of vertical-and-horizontal scatter degree method and global entropy weight -TOPSIS- grey relational analysis method. In addition, the Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition, Kernel density estimation and Moran's I methods were used to further analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of regional differences in GTI. The results showed that: (1) In 2006–2019, China's overall and four regions' GTIs showed an overall growth trend, but the growth rate gradually slowed down after 2013. Governments' environmental governance and enterprises' green production dimensions contributed to GTI, while residents' green consumption dimension constrained it. (2) The regional differences in China's GTI were mainly caused by the inter-regional differences, and the contribution rate of inter-regional differences was increasing. The intra-regional differences and inter-regional differences of GTIs in the four regions were all on a decreasing trend. (3) The absolute differences in China's overall and four regions' GTIs were gradually decreasing, gradually forming a stable polarization status of H-H aggregation and L-L aggregation. Among them, the eastern and central regions were H-H aggregation, while the western and northeast regions were L-L aggregation. Finally, recommendations were put forward according to results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1